Wing chamber control architectures based on SMA: numerical investigations

Benefits in terms of aerodynamic efficiency, aeroelastic behaviour, stability and manoeuvrability performance coming from the adaptive variation of wing geometric (e.g. thickness and chamber) and mechanical (e.g. rigidity) parameters were widely proved. In this scenario, more and more efficient architectures based on innovative materials like shape memory alloys, piezoelectrics, magneto-rheologic fluids were ideated and related morphing ability was tested. Due to the large transmitted forces and deformations, for static applications, SMA based-on architectures were implemented. The essential idea of all these architectures is to integrate a SMA actuator, lacking of remarkable structural value, within a classical wing structure or within a suitably designed one. The main disadvantage of such architectures derives by the necessity of deforming a classical structure, not designed for reaching large displacements. In order to avoid these problems, in this work, the idea of integrating compliant structures by SMA elements, was considered. Some deformation strategies, focused on the wing aft part morphing, were ideated; related performance in terms of vertical displacement and rotation of the trailing edge was estimated by a FE approach. Each architecture is characterised by SMA rod elements able to guarantee large deformations and shape control under aerodynamic loads.

[1]  Fernando Martini Catalano,et al.  Drag optimization for a transport aircraft mission adaptive wing , 2000 .

[2]  Craig A. Rogers,et al.  One-Dimensional Thermomechanical Constitutive Relations for Shape Memory Materials , 1990 .

[3]  Jamey Jacob,et al.  ACTIVE CONTROL OF SEPARATION ON A WING WITH CONFORMAL CAMBER , 2001 .

[4]  E Stanewsky,et al.  Adaptive wing and flow control technology , 2001 .

[5]  Darryll J. Pines,et al.  Pneumatic Morphing Aspect Ratio Wing , 2004 .

[6]  Terrence A. Weisshaar,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Morphing Technologies on Aircraft Performance , 2002 .

[7]  Inderjit Chopra,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Shape Memory Alloy Constitutive Models with Experimental Data , 2001 .

[8]  D. Lagoudas,et al.  A thermodynamical constitutive model for shape memory materials. Part I. The monolithic shape memory alloy , 1996 .

[9]  L. C. Brinson,et al.  Deformation of Shape Memory Alloys Due to Thermo-Induced Transformation , 1996 .

[10]  Jayanth N. Kudva,et al.  Overview of the DARPA/AFRL/NASA Smart Wing Phase II program , 2001, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[11]  J. V. Gilfrich,et al.  Effect of Low‐Temperature Phase Changes on the Mechanical Properties of Alloys near Composition TiNi , 1963 .

[12]  Holger Hanselka,et al.  Design aspects of the adaptive wing — the elastic trailing edge and the local spoiler bump , 2000, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[13]  J. J. Spillman,et al.  The use of variable camber to reduce drag, weight and costs of transport aircraft , 1992, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[14]  Ernie Havens,et al.  Morphing Wing Structures for Loitering Air Vehicles , 2004 .

[15]  Inderjit Chopra,et al.  Review of State of Art of Smart Structures and Integrated Systems , 2002 .