Automatic optimum order selection of parametric modelling for the evaluation of abnormal intra-QRS signals in signal-averaged electrocardiograms

Abnormal intra-QRS potentials (AIQPs) in signal-averaged electrocardiograms have been proposed as a risk evaluation index for ventricular arrhythmias. The purpose of the paper was to develop an automatic algorithm for selecting the optimum parametric model order in the analysis of AIQPs to make the modelling approach clinically more feasible. A total of 130 normal Taiwanese subjects and 87 patients with ventricular premature contractions and 23 with sustained ventricular tachycardia were recruited. The unpredictable AIQP signal was estimated from the modelling residual. The cross-correlation coefficient between the original signal and the QRS estimate was employed to evaluate the accuracy of the estimate. A pre-selected threshold cross-correlation coefficient of 0.9999 was used to determine the optimum order. The mean AIQP in lead Y for ventricular tachycardia patients was 3.9 μV, which was significantly smaller than 4.9 μV for ventricular premature contraction patients (p<0.01) and 6.3 μV for normal subjects (p<0.001). The linear combination of AIQP in lead Y and the time-domain parameter RMS40 provided the best global performance (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 89.1%). A higher risk of ventricular arrhythmias was associated with lower AIQP in lead Y, and the automatic modelling algorithm improved the clinical feasibility of AIQP analysis.

[1]  R. Califf,et al.  Comparison of time domain and frequency domain variables from the signal-averaged electrocardiogram: a multivariable analysis. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Analysis of abnormal signals within the QRS complex of the high-resolution electrocardiogram , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  V Hombach,et al.  Standards for analysis of ventricular late potentials using high-resolution or signal-averaged electrocardiography: a statement by a task force committee of the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  J. Rissanen,et al.  Modeling By Shortest Data Description* , 1978, Autom..

[5]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[6]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  P Lander,et al.  Spectrotemporal analysis of ventricular late potentials. , 1990, Journal of electrocardiology.

[8]  P Lander,et al.  Analysis of abnormal intra-QRS potentials. Improved predictive value for arrhythmic events with the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. , 1997, Circulation.

[9]  W. Pae,et al.  Cardiac surgery: a glimpse into the future. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  B E Sobel,et al.  Fast-Fourier transform analysis of signal-averaged electrocardiograms for identification of patients prone to sustained ventricular tachycardia. , 1984, Circulation.

[11]  Masatoshi Nakamura,et al.  Parametric modeling of somatosensory evoked potentials using discrete cosine transform , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  H. Akaike Fitting autoregressive models for prediction , 1969 .

[13]  A. Camm,et al.  Frequency Versus Time Domain Analysis of the Signal‐Averaged Electrocardiogram: Reproducibility of the Spectral Turbulence Analysis , 1993, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[14]  R Haberl,et al.  Comparison of frequency and time domain analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram in patients with ventricular tachycardia and coronary artery disease: methodologic validation and clinical relevance. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  P. Greenland,et al.  Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Principles and applications. , 1981, Annals of internal medicine.

[16]  A comparative study of frequency domain and time domain analysis of signal-averaged electrocardiograms in patients with ventricular tachycardia. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Michael E. Cain,et al.  Signal-averaged electrocardiography , 1996 .

[18]  E. Caref,et al.  Spectral turbulence analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram and its predictive accuracy for inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  L. Mcbride,et al.  A technique for the identification of linear systems , 1965 .

[20]  J. A. Guerrero,et al.  Reproducibility of time-domain and three different frequency-domain techniques for the analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. , 2000, Journal of electrocardiology.

[21]  I.S.N. Murthy,et al.  Analysis of ECG from pole-zero models , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  N. Ahmed,et al.  Discrete Cosine Transform , 1996 .

[23]  R Haberl,et al.  Spectral mapping of the electrocardiogram with Fourier transform for identification of patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia and coronary artery disease. , 1989, European heart journal.

[24]  M. Simson Use of Signals in the Terminal QRS Complex to Identify Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction , 1981, Circulation.

[25]  J. Windle,et al.  Fast Fourier transformation of the entire low amplitude late QRS potential to predict ventricular tachycardia. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.