A Constructivist Framework for Understanding Entrepreneurship Performance

This paper outlines a constructivist framework for understanding the outcomes of the entrepreneurial process. The core thesis of the paper is that, taken alone, neither the personality of the entrepreneur nor the structural characteristics of the environment determine the outcome. Rather, it is argued that the outcome of the entrepreneurial process is emergent from a complex interaction between the entrepreneur, the environment, chance events and prior performance. The framework is illustrated with evidence from biographies of six entrepreneurs involved in successful processes.

[1]  R. L. Osborne,et al.  The dark side of the entrepreneur , 1991 .

[2]  Raymond W. Smilor,et al.  Chaos and the entrepreneurial process: Patterns and policy implications for technology entrepreneurship , 1991 .

[3]  J. Hassard Multiple Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: A Case Study , 1991 .

[4]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Effects of strategy and environment on corporate venture success in industrial markets , 1991 .

[5]  R. Whittington Social Structures and Resistance to Strategic Change: British Manufacturers in the 1980s1 , 1990 .

[6]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Starting up in a turbulent environment: A process model of failure among firms with high customer dependence , 1990 .

[7]  William B. Gartner,et al.  A profile of new venture success and failure in an emerging industry , 1990 .

[8]  M.S.S. El-Namaki Small business—The myths and the reality , 1990 .

[9]  Robert H. Keeley,et al.  Predictors of success in new technology based ventures , 1990 .

[10]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Using an Ecological Perspective to Study Organizational Founding Rates , 1990 .

[11]  W. Bygrave,et al.  The Entrepreneurship Paradigm (II): Chaos and Catastrophes among Quantum Jumps? , 1990 .

[12]  F. Coninck,et al.  L'approche biographique à l'épreuve de l'interprétation. Les formes temporelles de la causalité , 1990 .

[13]  J. Passeron Biographies, flux, itinéraires, trajectoires , 1990 .

[14]  A. Ginsberg,et al.  Are Entrepreneurs a Breed Apart? A Look at the Evidence , 1989 .

[15]  William D. Bygrave,et al.  The Entrepreneur ship Paradigm (I): A Philosophical Look at Its Research Methodologies , 1989 .

[16]  Robert Drazin,et al.  On the Language of Organization Theory , 1989 .

[17]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Environments and Strategies of Organization Start-Up: Effects on Early Survival , 1989 .

[18]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  VISIONARY LEADERSHIP AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1989 .

[19]  M. DeVries Prisoners of leadership , 1989 .

[20]  A. Giddens Social theory of modern societies: A reply to my critics , 1989 .

[21]  Murray B. Low,et al.  Entrepreneurship: Past Research and Future Challenges , 1988 .

[22]  W. Gartner “Who Is an Entrepreneur?” Is the Wrong Question , 1988 .

[23]  Michael Ivor Reed,et al.  The Problem of Human Agency in Organizational Analysis , 1988 .

[24]  James W. Fairfield-Sonn,et al.  The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in ICI. , 1987 .

[25]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process , 1987 .

[26]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[27]  A. Ibrahim,et al.  Perceived Causes of Success in Small Business , 1986 .

[28]  William B. Gartner,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation , 1985 .

[29]  K. D. Vries,et al.  The Dark Side of Entrepreneurship , 1985 .

[30]  E. Shils The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[31]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[32]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Ambiguity of Leadership , 1977 .

[33]  G. Poggi Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology , 1969 .

[34]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[35]  Robert C. Davis,et al.  The Achieving Society , 1962 .

[36]  Raimar Richers The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[37]  E. Durkheim,et al.  Rules of Sociological Method , 1964 .