Multiple Objective Approach as an Alternative to Radial Projection in DEA

Radial projection is a standard technique applied in data envelopment analysis (DEA) to calculate efficiency scores for input and/or output variables. In this paper, we have studied the appropriateness of radial projection for target setting. We have created a situation where the decision making units (DMUs) are free to choose their own target values on the efficient frontier and then compared the results to those of radial projection. In practice, target values are primarily used for future goal attainment; hence, not only preferences but also, and on the whole, change in time frame, affect the choice of target values. Based on that, we conducted an empirical experiment with an aim to study how the DMUs choose their most preferred target values on the efficient frontier. The subjects, who all were students of the Helsinki School of Economics, were given the freedom to explore their personalized efficient frontiers by using a multiple objective linear programming (MOLP) approach. To study various and relevant scenarios, the personalized efficient frontiers for all students were constructed in such a way that the current position of each student in relation to the frontier made him/her inefficient, efficient, or super-efficient. The results show that the use of radial projection for target setting is too restrictive.

[1]  Andrzej P. Wierzbicki,et al.  The Use of Reference Objectives in Multiobjective Optimization , 1979 .

[2]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[3]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[4]  R. Kopp Measuring the technical efficiency of production: A comment☆ , 1981 .

[5]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[6]  O. H. Brownlee,et al.  ACTIVITY ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTION AND ALLOCATION , 1952 .

[7]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Notes on some inequalities in economics , 2000 .

[8]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Measuring the technical efficiency of production , 1978 .

[9]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  DEA and Activity Planning under Asymmetric Information , 2000 .

[10]  Jonas Månsson Essays on: Application of Cross Sectional Efficiency Analysis , 2001 .

[11]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Estimating preferred target input−output levels using data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[12]  G. Debreu The Coefficient of Resource Utilization , 1951 .

[13]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  A Visual Interactive Method for Solving the Multiple-Criteria Problem , 1986 .

[14]  William W. Cooper,et al.  SHORT COMMUNICATION: MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION MAKING UNITS , 1979 .

[15]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[16]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[17]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  Structural Comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis and Multiple Objective Linear Programming , 1998 .

[18]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[19]  Pekka Korhonen Searching the Efficient Frontier in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .

[20]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  The choice of a technical efficiency measure on the free disposal hull reference technology: A comparison using US banking data , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  A pareto race , 1988 .