Robust structural health monitoring under environmental and operational uncertainty with switching state-space autoregressive models

Existing methods for structural health monitoring are limited due to their sensitivity to changes in environmental and operational conditions, which can obscure the indications of damage by introducing nonlinearities and other types of noise into the structural response. In this article, we introduce a novel approach using state-space probability models to infer the conditions underlying each time step, allowing the definition of a damage metric robust to environmental and operational variation. We define algorithms for training and prediction, describe how the algorithm can be applied in both the presence and absence of measurements for external conditions, and demonstrate the method’s performance on data acquired from a laboratory structure that simulates the effects of damage and environmental and operational variation on bridges.

[1]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  DATA NORMALIZATION: A KEY FOR STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING , 2001 .

[2]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Influence of the Autoregressive Model Order on Damage Detection , 2011, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[3]  Shien-Ming Wu,et al.  Time series and system analysis with applications , 1983 .

[4]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  VIBRATION-BASED DAMAGE DETECTION USING STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL , 2001 .

[5]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Modeling and diagnosis of structural systems through sparse dynamic graphical models , 2016 .

[6]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability , 2011 .

[7]  E. Peter Carden,et al.  Vibration Based Condition Monitoring: A Review , 2004 .

[8]  Keith Worden,et al.  STRUCTURAL FAULT DETECTION USING A NOVELTY MEASURE , 1997 .

[9]  Keith Worden,et al.  Switching Response Surface Models for Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges , 2013 .

[10]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Switching Kalman Filters , 1998 .

[11]  Kung-Sik Chan,et al.  Time Series Analysis: With Applications in R , 2010 .

[12]  A. De Stefano,et al.  Structural identification using ARMAV models from noisy dynamic response under unknown random excitation , 1997 .

[13]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  Damage/fault diagnosis in an operating wind turbine under uncertainty via a vibration response Gaussian mixture random coefficient model based framework , 2017 .

[14]  Tim Verbelen,et al.  Data Normalization for Foundation SHM of an Offshore Wind Turbine : A Real-Life Case Study , 2014 .

[15]  Fred Spiring,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control , 2007, Technometrics.

[16]  Keith Worden,et al.  Features for damage detection with insensitivity to environmental and operational variations , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods , 1998 .

[18]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[19]  John A. Quinn,et al.  Factorial Switching Linear Dynamical Systems Applied to Physiological Condition Monitoring , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring Studies of the Alamosa Canyon and I-40 Bridges , 2000 .

[21]  Hossein Mobahi,et al.  A Bayesian State-Space Approach for Damage Detection and Classification , 2017 .

[22]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[23]  S. Alampalli,et al.  Influence of in-service environment on modal parameters , 1998 .

[24]  Jean-Claude Golinval,et al.  MODAL IDENTIFICATION AND DAMAGE DETECTION USING THE DATA-DRIVEN STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE AND ARMAV METHODS , 2003 .

[25]  Pizhong Qiao,et al.  Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study , 2011 .

[26]  Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Engineering Science , 2022 .

[27]  D. Dickey,et al.  Identifying damage locations under ambient vibrations utilizing vector autoregressive models and Mahalanobis distances , 2012 .

[28]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Dynamic characterization and damage detection in the I-40 bridge over the Rio Grande , 1994 .

[29]  Gyuhae Park,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring With Autoregressive Support Vector Machines , 2009 .