The effects of dimmable road lighting: A comparison of measured and perceived visibility

Abstract By dimming road lighting, energy can be conserved without compromising traffic safety. This paper presents a study carried out on the effect of different lighting levels from road luminaires on drivers’ visual performance on a low traffic urban road. The small uniform target was used to evaluate the visibility performance of the drivers. The results obtained from subjective graded visibility were compared with contrast and the Adrian model. Results indicated a strong correlation between subjective graded visibility and contrast ( R 2  = 0.94) and a positive correlation between subjective graded visibility and the Adrian model ( R 2  = 0.88). Target’s location in relation to road luminaires had a considerable effect on its visibility. However, visibility is not a monotonic function of road lighting level. In the absence of glare from an oncoming car, 49% (3557 lm) of road lighting intensity provided better contrast and mean visibility than 100% (7252 lm) and 71% (5179 lm) of road lighting intensities. The glare from oncoming cars reduced visibility. However, no statistically significant effect of road lighting level on visibility under glare could be found.

[1]  M. S. Janoff,et al.  The Relationship between Visibility Level and Subjective Ratings of Visibility , 1992 .

[2]  Marjukka Eloholma,et al.  The Contribution of Vehicle Headlights to Visibility of Targets in Road Lighting Environments , 2008 .

[3]  J. M. Christian Bastien,et al.  The effect of the driving activity on target detection as a function of the visibility level: Implications for road lighting , 2010 .

[4]  E. Peli.  Contrast in complex images. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  Liisa Halonen,et al.  Effects of vehicle headlights on target contrast in road lighting environments , 2008 .

[6]  P. Raynham.  An examination of the fundamentals of road lighting for pedestrians and drivers , 2004 .

[7]  Peter Raynham,et al.  Disability glare: A study in simulated road lighting conditions , 2014 .

[8]  D. Schreuder,et al.  Vision and Visual Perception: The Conscious Base of Seeing , 2014 .

[9]  N A Kaptein,et al.  DYNAMIC PUBLIC LIGHTING. PHASE 3: FIELD EVALUATION , 1998 .

[10]  A Bacelar.  The contribution of vehicle lights in urban and peripheral urban environments , 2004 .

[11]  Tariq M Aslam,et al.  Principles of disability glare measurement: an ophthalmological perspective. , 2007, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[12]  S Senadheera,et al.  EVALUATION OF ROADWAY LIGHTING SYSTEMS DESIGNED BY STV METHODS - A REVIEW OF THE DESIGN OF ROADWAY LIGHTING BY SMALL TARGET VISIBILITY (STV) METHODS , 1997 .

[13]  A. J. Fisher,et al.  Road lighting as an accident counter-measure , 1977 .

[14]  A. Bacelar,et al.  Calculational visibility model for road lighting installations , 1999 .

[15]  Per Ole Wanvik.  Effects of Road Lighting on Motorways , 2009, Traffic injury prevention.

[16]  Ismail Serkan Üncü,et al.  Analysis of visibility level in road lighting using image processing techniques , 2010 .

[17]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Meta-analysis of evaluations of public lighting as accident countermeasure , 1995 .

[18]  Peter Boyce.  Lighting for Driving: Roads, Vehicles, Signs, and Signals , 2008 .

[19]  Kohei Narisada,et al.  Light Pollution Handbook , 2004 .

[20]  M. ZalesiŃska.  Theoretical Model Of The Visibility Level And Practical Means Of Its Implementation , 2012 .

[21]  Eric Dumont,et al.  Target visibility level and detection distance on a driving simulator , 2013 .

[22]  W. Adrian,et al.  Visibility of targets: Model for calculation , 1989 .

[23]  W. Adrian.  Visibility Levels under Night-time Driving Conditions , 1987 .

[24]  Eric Dumont,et al.  Photometric measurements for visibility level computations , 2011 .

[25]  Marjukka Eloholma,et al.  Analysis of Road Lighting Quantity and Quality in Varying Weather Conditions , 2007 .