Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Treatment of Residual Refractive Error following Femtosecond Laser-Enabled Keratoplasty

Purpose To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in the treatment of residual myopia and astigmatism following femtosecond laser-enabled keratoplasty (FLEK). Design Retrospective case review. Methods Chart review of all patients with prior FLEK who subsequently underwent femto-LASIK surgery after full suture removal was performed at the Gavin Herbert Eye Institute at the University of California, Irvine. A total of 14 eyes in 13 patients met this criterion, and their comprehensive examinations performed at standard intervals were reviewed. Main outcome measures include uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) expressed as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), manifest refractive astigmatism, and spherical equivalent. Results From the preoperative visit to the 3 month visit, all 14 eyes significantly improved in UDVA (logMAR, 0.93 ± 0.23 to 0.44 ± 0.32, P = 0.002) with no loss of CDVA (logMAR, 0.26 ± 0.19 to 0.18 ± 0.23, P = 0.50). All 14 eyes showed significant improvement in manifest refractive astigmatism (4.71 ± 1.77 to 2.18 ± 1.45 diopters (D), P = 0.003) and spherical equivalent (−2.57 ± 2.45 to −0.48 ± 0.83 D, P = 0.0007). There were no flap or graft complications as a result of femto-LASIK. Conclusions Our findings suggest that femto-LASIK on eyes with prior FLEK is safe and effective in improving visual acuity and reducing residual astigmatism.

[1]  S. Kwitko,et al.  Topography-guided ablation for the treatment of irregular astigmatism , 2019, Journal of EuCornea.

[2]  R. Pokroy,et al.  Myopic laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment: Incidence and associations , 2016, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  J. Hernández-Camarena,et al.  3-Year follow-up after Lasik: assessing the risk factors for retreatment , 2016, International Ophthalmology.

[4]  J. Alió,et al.  Refractive surgery following corneal graft , 2015, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[5]  M. Ghoreishi,et al.  Visual outcomes of Femto-LASIK for correction of residual refractive error after corneal graft , 2013, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[6]  Sumitra S. Khandelwal,et al.  Corneal scarring from laser in situ keratomileusis after epikeratoplasty: clinical and histopathologic analysis. , 2013, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  R. Steinert,et al.  Femtosecond Laser-enabled Keratoplasty , 2013, International ophthalmology clinics.

[8]  H. Dua,et al.  Management of post-keratoplasty astigmatism. , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  Y. Rabinowitz,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty using femtosecond laser-enabled keratoplasty with zig-zag incisions versus a mechanical trephine in patients with keratoconus , 2012, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[10]  Ferda Çiftçi,et al.  Laser in situ keratomileusis to manage refractive errors after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  W. Culbertson,et al.  Protective effect of LASIK flap in penetrating keratoplasty following blunt trauma. , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  Frederick W. Fraunfelder,et al.  Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional penetrating keratoplasty. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[13]  J. Mehta,et al.  A 10-year prospective audit of LASIK outcomes for myopia in 37,932 eyes at a single institution in Asia. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[14]  R. Steinert,et al.  Comparison of penetrating keratoplasty performed with a femtosecond laser zig-zag incision versus conventional blade trephination. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[15]  I. Bahar,et al.  Femtosecond laser versus manual dissection for top hat penetrating keratoplasty , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[16]  E. Pels,et al.  Femtosecond laser-assisted inverted mushroom keratoplasty. , 2008, Cornea.

[17]  F. Price,et al.  Femtosecond laser shaped penetrating keratoplasty: one-year results utilizing a top-hat configuration. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  Matthew Kim,et al.  Results of penetrating keratoplasty performed with a femtosecond laser zigzag incision initial report. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[19]  L. Buratto,et al.  The use of the femtosecond laser in penetrating keratoplasty. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  Roger F Steinert,et al.  "Top hat"-shaped penetrating keratoplasty using the femtosecond laser. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  R. Chuck,et al.  Top Hat Wound Configuration for Penetrating Keratoplasty Using the Femtosecond Laser: A Laboratory Model , 2006, Cornea.

[22]  J. Febbraro,et al.  Laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of residual ametropia after penetrating keratoplasty , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[23]  E. Holland,et al.  Correction of Myopia and Astigmatism After Penetrating Keratoplasty With Laser In Situ Keratomileusis , 2002, Cornea.

[24]  D. Marinho,et al.  Laser in situ keratomileusis after penetrating keratoplasty , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[25]  K. M. Rashad Laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[26]  C. McGhee,et al.  Laser in situ keratomileusis for ametropia after penetrating keratoplasty. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[27]  S. Shah,et al.  Outcomes of retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[28]  E. Donnenfeld,et al.  Laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[29]  C. Francesconi,et al.  Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct refractive errors after keratoplasty. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[30]  S. Brooks,et al.  Anisometropia and binocularity. , 1996, Ophthalmology.