Can face-to-face patient education be replaced by computer-based patient education? A randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: Computer-based patient education is an effective (therapeutic) tool. More and more studies prove that it can be an effective additive for face-to-face education, but it is still unclear if it is possible to educate patients by only using a computer. Our objective was to compare knowledge levels and satisfaction scores after computer-based patient education versus doctor-based patient education. METHODS: We started a randomised and stratified trial in a large plastic surgery clinic in the Netherlands. One hundred thirteen patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), scheduled for operation were included. One group received CTS education by a doctor using a checklist (group A). The other group received the same CTS education by specially designed interactive computer program (group B). After 2 weeks, knowledge levels and satisfaction scores were tested by using a questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen patients were included, 96 patients finished the questionnaire. With respect to knowledge levels the doctor group (A) scored 20.2 points (max 40 points), and the computer group (B) scored 23.5 points. After correction the difference was 2.8 points (p=0.001). The total satisfaction score in group A was 7.6 and in group B 7.5; a difference of -0.16 (p=0.585). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that educating patients can result in a higher knowledge levels by using a computer than by using a doctor. Satisfaction seems equal after both methods of education. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Knowing that you can educate patients without seeing a doctor or nurse seems promising. Patient can be educated by computer-based education programs leaving more time in a consultation for asking questions and discussing treatment options. The discussion will be at a more equal level of knowledge. Possibly it can save time and money resulting in a more efficient patient care, without dissatisfying our patients.

[1]  D. Torgerson,et al.  Randomisation methods in controlled trials , 1998, BMJ.

[2]  Suzanne M. Miller,et al.  Patient perception of involvement in medical care , 1989, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[3]  J. S. Briggs,et al.  Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction: by Ben Schneiderman. Published by Addison-Wesley. 463pp. £17.95 , 1987 .

[4]  John W. Evans,et al.  Alienation and learning in a hospital setting. , 1962 .

[5]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Processes of communication, information seeking and control associated with cancer: A selective review of the literature. , 1974, Social science & medicine.

[6]  B. Breemhaar,et al.  Effects of education and support for surgical patients: The role of perceived control , 1991 .

[7]  J Sobal,et al.  Health promotion: physicians' beliefs, attitudes, and practices. , 1986, American journal of preventive medicine.

[8]  B. Cassileth,et al.  Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. , 1980, Annals of internal medicine.

[9]  T. Beebe,et al.  A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Interactive, Multimedia Software for Patient Colonoscopy Education , 2001, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[10]  Peter Tugwell,et al.  A randomized trial of a computerized versus an audio-booklet decision aid for women considering post-menopausal hormone replacement therapy. , 2002, Patient education and counseling.

[11]  T. Sheehan,et al.  Evaluation of a computer based education lesson for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1985, The Journal of rheumatology.

[12]  E. A. Pristach,et al.  Computerized medication instruction for psychiatric inpatients admitted for acute care. , 1996, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[13]  H. Wechsler,et al.  The physician's role in health promotion--a survey of primary-care practitioners. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Sechrest Rc,et al.  Computer-based patient education: observations on effective communication in the clinical setting. , 1996, The Journal of biocommunication.

[15]  R. Street,et al.  Increasing patient involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer , 1995, Cancer.

[16]  J M Atkinson,et al.  Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for patients with schizophrenia , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  D. Brody,et al.  The patient's role in clinical decision-making. , 1980, Annals of internal medicine.

[18]  G Kahn,et al.  Computer-based patient education: a progress report. , 1993, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[19]  C. Sykes,et al.  A systematic review of computer-based softwares for educating patients with coronary heart disease. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[20]  M Ben Said,et al.  Benefits of a computer-assisted education program for hypertensive patients compared with standard education tools. , 1995, Patient education and counseling.

[21]  J Pearson,et al.  Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients , 1999, BMJ.

[22]  A. Ash,et al.  Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[23]  W Loren,et al.  Effect of a self-care education program on medical visits. , 1983, JAMA.

[24]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[25]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[26]  B. Keulers,et al.  Can face-to-face patient education be replaced by computer-based patient education? , 2003, European Journal of Plastic Surgery.

[27]  L. George,et al.  Health promotion in primary care: a survey of U.S. family practitioners. , 1985, Preventive medicine.

[28]  Zoe Strickler,et al.  An interactive technology approach to educate older adults about drug interactions arising from over-the-counter self-medication practices. , 2002, Public health nursing.

[29]  David Handelsman,et al.  Development of the Diabetes Knowledge (DKN) Scales: Forms DKNA, DKNB, and DKNC , 1984, Diabetes Care.

[30]  P M Bossuyt,et al.  Decision support for patients with early-stage breast cancer: effects of an interactive breast cancer CDROM on treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  Michael J Green,et al.  Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[32]  B. Keulers,et al.  Evidence-based development of interactive patient education programs: a guide for achieving optimal computer-based patient education , 2006, European Journal of Plastic Surgery.

[33]  Edward D. Smith,et al.  The multimedia computer for office-based patient education: a systematic review. , 2005, Patient education and counseling.

[34]  J. Donovan,et al.  A randomized trial comparing the effectiveness and preference of a touch‐screen computer system with a leaflet for providing women with information on urinary symptoms suggestive of detrusor instability , 2001, BJU international.

[35]  Anna Strömberg,et al.  Computer-based education for patients with chronic heart failure. A randomised, controlled, multicentre trial of the effects on knowledge, compliance and quality of life. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[36]  Jacob Nielsen,et al.  Guidelines for multimedia on the Web , 1997, World Wide Web J..

[37]  H. Waitzkin,et al.  Doctor-patient communication. Clinical implications of social scientific research. , 1984, JAMA.