Motivation and learning physics

Being involved in science education we cannot avoid confronting the problem of students' waning interest in physics. Therefore, we want to focus on arguments developed by new theoretical work in the field of motivation. Especially, we are attracted by the theory of motivation featured by Deci and Ryan, because it is related to an assumptions of human development similar to our own approach. Beneath elements of cognitive development, motivation is seen as a basic concept to describe students' learning in a physics classroom. German students at lower and upper secondary level regard physics as very difficult to learn, very abstract and dominated by male students. As a result physics at school continuously loses importance and acceptance although a lot of work has been done to modernise and develop the related physics courses. We assume that knowing about the influence of motivation on learning physics may lead to new insights in the design of classroom settings. Referring to Deci and Ryan, we use a model of motivation to describe the influence of two different teaching strategies (teacher and discourse oriented) on learning. Electrostatics was taught in year 8. The outcomes of a questionnaire which is able to evaluate defined, motivational states are compared with the interpretation of the same student's interaction in the related situation of the physics classroom. The scales of the questionnaire and the categories of analysis of the video-recording are derived from the same model of motivation.

[1]  Inge Schreyer,et al.  Intrinsische Lernmotivation und Lernen. Ein Überblick zu Ergebnissen der Forschung. , 1994 .

[2]  Andreas Krapp,et al.  Die Psychologie der Lernmotivation. Perspektiven der Forschung und Probleme ihrer pädagogischen Rezeption , 1993 .

[3]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Inner resources for school achievement : motivational mediators of children's perceptions of their parents , 1991 .

[4]  E. Deci,et al.  Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. , 1994, Journal of personality.

[5]  Hans E. Fischer,et al.  Development of Meaning during Physics Instruction: Case Studies in View of the Paradigm of Constructivism. , 1993 .

[6]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Die Selbstbestimmungstheorie der Motivation und ihre Bedeutung für die Pädagogik , 1993 .

[7]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Validity and Reliability of the Experience‐Sampling Method , 1987, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[8]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[9]  E. V. Glasersfeld.  Wissen, Sprache und Wirklichkeit , 1987 .

[10]  Manfred Prenzel,et al.  Ein Jahr kaufmännische Erstausbildung: Veränderungen in Lernmotivation und Interesse , 1996 .

[11]  Hans E. Fischer.  Framework for conducting empirical observations of learning processes , 1993 .

[12]  S. Hidi,et al.  The Role Of Interest In Learning And Development , 1994 .

[13]  Ulrich Schiefele,et al.  Die Qualität des Erlebens und der Prozess des Lernens , 1993 .

[14]  R. Ryan,et al.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. , 1989 .

[15]  E. Glasersfeld.  Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching , 1989 .

[16]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  An Instrument to Assess Adults' Orientations toward Control versus Autonomy with Children: Reflections on Intrinsic Motivation and Perceived Competence. , 1981 .

[17]  Elternhaus und intrinsische Lernmotivation , 1995 .

[18]  James G. Greeno.  Mathematical and Scientific Thinking in Classrooms and Other Situations , 1992 .

[19]  L. Wittgenstein,et al.  Philosophische Untersuchungen = Philosophical investigations , 1953 .

[20]  Interesse und Desinteresse am naturwissenschaftlich-technischen Unterricht , 1988 .