Variation in the intonation of extra-sentential elements

Extra-sentential elements usually form independent intonational domains. Due to this property, they have been used in the phonological literature to define the intonational phrase. This study, using English and Catalan empirical data collected in three experiments, shows significant variation in the phrasing and accentuation of these constructions. We argue that their role is primarily semantic: they are supplementary, semantically non-restrictive, and anaphorically linked to their referent. Prosody signals their grammatical function by means of independent phrasing, by reductions in pitch span leading to total deaccentuation, and/or by tonal reduplication. We argue that both tonal and junctural cues are used in combination to mark extra-sentential elements as external to the phrase.

[1]  M. Zubizarreta.  Prosody, Focus, and Word Order , 1998 .

[2]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  Phonological phrases : their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence , 1995 .

[3]  Nigel Fabb,et al.  The difference between English restrictive and nonrestrictive relative clauses , 1990, Journal of Linguistics.

[4]  D. Bolinger.  Intonation: selected readings; , 1972 .

[5]  H. Dillon,et al.  An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .

[6]  Marta Payà.  Prosody and Pragmatics in Parenthetical Insertions in Catalan , 2003 .

[7]  Knud Lambrecht,et al.  Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-Standard French , 1981 .

[8]  Zsuzsanna Fagyal.  Tonal Template for Background Information: the Scaling of Pitch in Utterance-Medial Parentheticals in French , 2002 .

[9]  Zsuzsanna Fagyal,et al.  Prosodic boundaries in the vicinity of utterance-medial parentheticals in French , 2002 .

[10]  Jean-Claude Junqua,et al.  The influence of acoustics on speech production: A noise-induced stress phenomenon known as the Lombard reflex , 1996, Speech Commun..

[11]  Janet Mueller Bing,et al.  Aspects of English prosody , 1979 .

[12]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[13]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Some Basic Considerations in the Analysis of Intonation , 1960 .

[14]  Jean-Claude Junqua,et al.  The Lombard effect: a reflex to better communicate with others in noise , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[15]  William E. Cooper,et al.  Syntax and Speech , 1980 .

[16]  Pilar Prieto,et al.  THE USE AND REALISATION OF ACCENTUAL FOCUS IN CENTRAL CATALAN WITH A COMPARISON TO ENGLISH , 2006 .

[17]  Janet Mueller Bing.  A Discourse Domain Identified by Intonation , 1984 .

[18]  Martine Grice,et al.  The Intonation of Interrogation in Palermo Italian: Implications for Intonation Theory , 1995 .

[19]  Daniel Recasens.  Fonètica i fonologia , 1993 .

[20]  Peter Wunderli.  L'intonation des séquences extraposées en français , 1987 .

[21]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Dynamic syntax - the flow of language understanding , 2000 .

[22]  Mark Liberman,et al.  The intonational system of English , 1979 .

[23]  H. Hughes.  The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , 2003 .

[24]  Francisco Casacuberta,et al.  An analysis of general acoustic-phonetic features for Spanish speech produced with the Lombard effect , 1996, Speech Commun..

[25]  Philippe Martin,et al.  Prosodic and rhythmic structures in French , 1987 .

[26]  Mariapaola D’Imperio.  Italian intonation: An overview and some questions , 2002 .

[27]  Ronald Geluykens.  The Pragmatics of Discourse Anaphora in English: Evidence from Conversational Repair , 1994 .

[28]  J. Goldsmith,et al.  The Structure of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from English , 1982 .

[29]  K. Safir.  Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels , 1986 .

[30]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[31]  D. Gibbon,et al.  Intonation, accent, and rhythm : studies in discourse phonology , 1984 .

[32]  Lluïsa Astruc.  Right-dislocations: Influence of information structure on prosodic phrasing and intonation , 2004 .

[33]  A. Cruttenden,et al.  English sentence adverbials: Their syntax and their intonation in British English , 1974 .

[34]  Joseph E. Emonds,et al.  A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure-Preserving, and Local Transformations , 1978 .

[35]  I. Sag.  English relative clause constructions , 1997, Journal of Linguistics.

[36]  Russell P. Getz.  Accent , 1983, What Noise Against the Cane.

[37]  Ronald Geluykens. From discourse process to grammatical construction: On left-dislocation in English , 1996 .

[38]  Marta Payà Canals.  Incidental Clauses in Spoken Catalan: Prosodic Characteristics and Pragmatic Function , 2002 .

[39]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  On the Relation between Syntactic Phrases and Phonological Phrases , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[40]  A. Hughes.  Oxford English Dictionary. , 2008, Isis; an international review devoted to the history of science and its cultural influences.

[41]  A. Cruttenden,et al.  Syntactic, illocutionary, thematic and attitudinal factors in the intonation of adverbials , 1978 .

[42]  H. Lane,et al.  The Lombard Sign and the Role of Hearing in Speech , 1971 .

[43]  C. Gussenhoven.  The phonology of tone and intonation , 2004 .

[44]  Dwight L. Bolinger.  English Prosodic Stress and Spanish Sentence Order , 1954 .

[45]  Enric Vallduví,et al.  Detachment in Catalan and information packaging , 1994 .

[46]  A. Botinis,et al.  Intonation , 2001, Speech Commun..