New distributional modelling approaches for gap analysis

Synthetic products based on biodiversity information such as gap analysis depend critically on accurate models of species' geographic distributions that simultaneously minimize error in both overprediction and omission. We compared current gap methodologies, as exemplified by the distributional models used in the Maine Gap Analysis project, with an alternative approach, the geographic projections of ecological niche models developed using the Genetic Algorithm for Rule-Set Prediction (GARP). Point-occurrence data were used to develop GARP models based on the same environmental data layers as were used in the gap project, and independent occurrence data used to test both methods. Gap models performed better in avoiding omission error, but GARP better avoided errors of overprediction. Advantages of the point-based approach, and strategies for its incorporation into current gap efforts are discussed.

[1]  David R. B. Stockwell,et al.  Genetic Algorithms II , 1999 .

[2]  A. Peterson,et al.  Effects of global climate change on geographic distributions of Mexican Cracidae , 2001 .

[3]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Geographical distributions of spiny pocket mice in South America: insights from predictive models , 2002 .

[4]  David R. B. Stockwell,et al.  The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction , 1999, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[5]  P. Walker,et al.  HABITAT : a procedure for modelling a disjoint environmental envelope for a plant or animal species , 1991 .

[6]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Using niche-based GIS modeling to test geographic predictions of competitive exclusion and competitive release in South American pocket mice , 2002 .

[7]  J. Nichols,et al.  Inference Methods for Spatial Variation in Species Richness and Community Composition When Not All Species Are Detected , 1998 .

[8]  Mariko Yamasaki,et al.  New England wildlife: management forested habitats , 1992 .

[9]  J. Grinnell.  Field Tests of Theories Concerning Distributional Control , 1917, The American Naturalist.

[10]  A. Peterson,et al.  Predicting distributions of Mexican birds using ecological niche modelling methods , 2002 .

[11]  David R. B. Stockwell,et al.  Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: a robust and informative method of data analysis , 1992 .

[12]  A. Peterson,et al.  Prediction of bird community composition based on point‐occurrence data and inferential algorithms: a valuable tool in biodiversity assessments , 2002 .

[13]  J. Grinnell.  Geography and Evolution , 1924 .

[14]  A. Peterson,et al.  Ecologic Niche Modeling and Potential Reservoirs for Chagas Disease, Mexico. , 2002, Emerging infectious diseases.

[15]  A. Peterson,et al.  Predicting Species Invasions Using Ecological Niche Modeling: New Approaches from Bioinformatics Attack a Pressing Problem , 2001 .

[16]  David R. B. Stockwell,et al.  Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios , 2002, Nature.

[17]  A. Peterson,et al.  Sensitivity of distributional prediction algorithms to geographic data completeness , 1999 .

[18]  R. G. Wright,et al.  GAP ANALYSIS: A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PROTECTION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY , 1993 .

[19]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species , 1990 .

[20]  N. Gotelli.  Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale , 2003 .

[21]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[22]  A. Peterson,et al.  PREDICTING SPECIES' GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTIONS BASED ON ECOLOGICAL NICHE MODELING , 2001 .

[23]  V. Sánchez‐Cordero,et al.  Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time , 1999, Science.

[24]  David R. B. Stockwell,et al.  Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models , 2002 .