The role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in radiation therapy planning for patients with lung cancer.

Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has rapidly assumed a critical role in the management of patients with locoregionally advanced lung cancers who are candidates for definitive radiation therapy (RT). Definitive RT is given with curative intent, but can only be successful in patients without distant metastasis and if all gross tumor is contained within the treated volume. An increasing body of evidence supports the use of PET-based imaging for selection of patients for both surgery and definitive RT. Similarly, the use of PET/CT images for accurate target volume definition in lung cancer is a dynamic area of research. Most available evidence on PET staging of lung cancer relates to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In general clinical use, (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is the primary radiopharmaceutical useful in NSCLC. Other tracers, including proliferation markers and hypoxia tracers, may have significant roles in future. Much of the FDG-PET literature describing the impact of PET on actual patient management has concerned candidates for surgical resection. In the few prospective studies where PET was used for staging and patient selection in NSCLC candidates for definitive RT, 25%-30% of patients were denied definitive RT, generally because PET detected unsuspected advanced locoregional or distant metastatic disease. PET/CT and CT findings are often discordant in NSCLC but studies with clinical-pathological correlation always show that PET-assisted staging is more accurate than conventional assessment. In all studies in which "PET-defined" and "non-PET-defined" RT target volumes were compared, there were major differences between PET and non-PET volumes. Therefore, in cases where PET-assisted and non-PET staging are different and biopsy confirmation is unavailable, it is rational to use the most accurate modality (namely PET/CT) to define the target volume. The use of PET/CT in patient selection and target volume definition is likely to lead to improvements in outcome for patients with NSCLC.

[1]  J. Matthews,et al.  Early mortality after radical radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: comparison of PET-staged and conventionally staged cohorts treated at a large tertiary referral center. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  V Grégoire,et al.  State of the art on dose prescription, reporting and recording in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (ICRU report No. 83). , 2011, Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique.

[3]  Curtis B Caldwell,et al.  The impact of (18)FDG-PET on target and critical organs in CT-based treatment planning of patients with poorly defined non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a prospective study. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  18F-FDG PET definition of gross tumor volume for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: is a single standardized uptake value threshold approach appropriate? , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  B. Murray,et al.  Thresholding in PET images of static and moving targets , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Rodney J Hicks,et al.  Reproducibility of "intelligent" contouring of gross tumor volume in non-small-cell lung cancer on PET/CT images using a standardized visual method. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  A. Maier,et al.  Resection in stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer. , 2010, Frontiers of radiation therapy and oncology.

[8]  M. M. Mac Manus,et al.  How can we tell if PET imaging for cancer is cost effective? , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  K Schnabel,et al.  18F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the planning of radiotherapy in lung cancer: high impact in patients with atelectasis. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  C. Rübe,et al.  Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  PET-CT-based auto-contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Anil Sethi,et al.  Correlation of PET standard uptake value and CT window-level thresholds for target delineation in CT-based radiation treatment planning. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Robert Jeraj,et al.  PET scans in radiotherapy planning of lung cancer. , 2012, Lung cancer.

[14]  Michalis Aristophanous,et al.  Clinical utility of 4D FDG-PET/CT scans in radiation treatment planning. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  P. Lambin,et al.  Identification of residual metabolic-active areas within individual NSCLC tumours using a pre-radiotherapy (18)Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-CT scan. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  Ursula Nestle,et al.  Target volume definition for 18F-FDG PET-positive lymph nodes in radiotherapy of patients with non-small cell lung cancer , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  C B Caldwell,et al.  Observer variation in contouring gross tumor volume in patients with poorly defined non-small-cell lung tumors on CT: the impact of 18FDG-hybrid PET fusion. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Impact of FDG-PET on radiation therapy volume delineation in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Y. Ung,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography in Staging Early Lung Cancer , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[20]  M. Boers,et al.  Toward less futile surgery in non-small cell lung cancer? A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of positron emission tomography. , 2001, Controlled clinical trials.

[21]  Tomas Kron,et al.  Imaging cellular proliferation during chemo-radiotherapy: a pilot study of serial 18F-FLT positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Douglas C McCrory,et al.  Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a review of the current evidence. , 2003, Chest.

[23]  Hak Choy,et al.  A phase II comparative study of gross tumor volume definition with or without PET/CT fusion in dosimetric planning for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): primary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0515. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Sung-Cheng Huang,et al.  Anatomy of SUV , 2000 .

[25]  D. Owens,et al.  Test Performance of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography for Mediastinal Staging in Patients with NonSmall-Cell Lung Cancer , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  V Kalff,et al.  F‐18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography staging in radical radiotherapy candidates with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma , 2001, Cancer.

[27]  D. Mankoff,et al.  18F-Fluorothymidine radiation dosimetry in human PET imaging studies. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  T G Turkington,et al.  Multimodality nuclear medicine imaging in three-dimensional radiation treatment planning for lung cancer: challenges and prospects. , 1999, Lung cancer.

[29]  P. Lambin,et al.  High-dose radiotherapy or concurrent chemo-radiation in lung cancer patients only induces a temporary, reversible decline in QoL. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[30]  Slobodan Devic,et al.  Impact of FDG-PET/CT on radiotherapy volume delineation in non-small-cell lung cancer and correlation of imaging stage with pathologic findings. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  John J. Crowley,et al.  国际肺癌研究会分期项目——采用外科治疗的非小细胞肺癌的预后因素和病理TNM分期 , 2010, Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer.

[32]  R. Bares,et al.  FDG PET for staging of advanced non-small cell lung cancer prior to neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[33]  H. Groen,et al.  Traditional versus up-front [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: a Dutch cooperative randomized study. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  U. Nestle,et al.  FDG-PET-based radiotherapy planning in lung cancer: optimum breathing protocol and patient positioning--an intraindividual comparison. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[35]  J. Crowley,et al.  We probably have the answer: now what is the question? , 2009, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[36]  J. Verschakelen,et al.  Detection of extrapulmonary lesions with integrated PET/CT in the staging of lung cancer , 2007, European Respiratory Journal.

[37]  E. Touboul,et al.  Impact of (18)F-FDG PET on treatment strategy and 3D radiotherapy planning in non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective multicenter study. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[38]  V Kalff,et al.  Clinical impact of (18)F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective study. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  Danny Rischin,et al.  Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  M. Morelle,et al.  Assessing short-term effects and costs at an early stage of innovation: The use of positron emission tomography on radiotherapy treatment decision making , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[41]  Sadek Nehmeh,et al.  Does registration of PET and planning CT images decrease interobserver and intraobserver variation in delineating tumor volumes for non-small-cell lung cancer? , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[42]  R. Fisher,et al.  Measurement of lung tumor volumes using three-dimensional computer planning software. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[43]  Gerald J. Kutcher,et al.  The impact of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) lymph node staging on the radiation treatment volumes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer , 2000 .

[44]  T. Ackerly,et al.  Display of positron emission tomography with Cadplan , 2002, Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[45]  D K Owens,et al.  Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. , 2001, JAMA.

[46]  Ludy Lutgens,et al.  Increased therapeutic ratio by 18FDG-PET CT planning in patients with clinical CT stage N2-N3M0 non-small-cell lung cancer: a modeling study. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[47]  Arjan Bel,et al.  Definition of gross tumor volume in lung cancer: inter-observer variability. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[48]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[49]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  Additional PET/CT in week 5-6 of radiotherapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer as a means of dose escalation planning? , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[50]  Ursula Nestle,et al.  Biological imaging in radiation therapy: role of positron emission tomography , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[51]  T. Naruke,et al.  Visual and semiquantitative analyses for F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning in pulmonary nodules 1 cm to 3 cm in size. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[52]  J. Mortensen,et al.  Preoperative staging of lung cancer with PET/CT: cost-effectiveness evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[53]  L. H. Gray,et al.  Influence of oxygen tension on x-ray-induced chromosomal damage in Ehrlich ascites tumor cells irradiated in vitro and in vivo. , 1959, Radiation research.

[54]  Indrin J Chetty,et al.  A pilot study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans during and after radiation-based therapy in patients with non small-cell lung cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[55]  Tomio Inoue,et al.  Use of PET and PET/CT for radiation therapy planning: IAEA expert report 2006-2007. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[56]  M. Schneider-Kolsky,et al.  High rates of tumor growth and disease progression detected on serial pretreatment fluorodeoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans in radical radiotherapy candidates with nonsmall cell lung cancer , 2010, Cancer.

[57]  S. Nehmeh,et al.  An iterative technique to segment PET lesions using a Monte Carlo based mathematical model. , 2009, Medical physics.

[58]  V. Rusch,et al.  Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[59]  A. Hogg,et al.  High rate of detection of unsuspected distant metastases by pet in apparent stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: implications for radical radiation therapy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[60]  Hanna El Balaa,et al.  Impact of computed tomography and 18F-deoxyglucose coincidence detection emission tomography image fusion for optimization of conformal radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[61]  K. Bujko,et al.  Impact of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT staging on treatment planning in radiotherapy incorporating elective nodal irradiation for non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective study. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[62]  M. Yaffe,et al.  Developing a methodology for three-dimensional correlation of PET–CT images and whole-mount histopathology in non-small-cell lung cancer , 2008, Current oncology.

[63]  P. Marsden,et al.  Recommendations for the use of PET and PET-CT for radiotherapy planning in research projects. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[64]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Exclusion of elective nodal irradiation is associated with minimal elective nodal failure in non-small cell lung cancer , 2009, Radiation oncology.

[65]  Target Volume Definition , 2009 .

[66]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  Effects of radiotherapy planning with a dedicated combined PET-CT-simulator of patients with non-small cell lung cancer on dose limiting normal tissues and radiation dose-escalation: a planning study. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.