Treefrogs as animal models for research on auditory scene analysis and the cocktail party problem.

The perceptual analysis of acoustic scenes involves binding together sounds from the same source and separating them from other sounds in the environment. In large social groups, listeners experience increased difficulty performing these tasks due to high noise levels and interference from the concurrent signals of multiple individuals. While a substantial body of literature on these issues pertains to human hearing and speech communication, few studies have investigated how nonhuman animals may be evolutionarily adapted to solve biologically analogous communication problems. Here, I review recent and ongoing work aimed at testing hypotheses about perceptual mechanisms that enable treefrogs in the genus Hyla to communicate vocally in noisy, multi-source social environments. After briefly introducing the genus and the methods used to study hearing in frogs, I outline several functional constraints on communication posed by the acoustic environment of breeding "choruses". Then, I review studies of sound source perception aimed at uncovering how treefrog listeners may be adapted to cope with these constraints. Specifically, this review covers research on the acoustic cues used in sequential and simultaneous auditory grouping, spatial release from masking, and dip listening. Throughout the paper, I attempt to illustrate how broad-scale, comparative studies of carefully considered animal models may ultimately reveal an evolutionary diversity of underlying mechanisms for solving cocktail-party-like problems in communication.

[1]  M. Ryan,et al.  The behavioral neuroscience of anuran social signal processing , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  E. C. Cmm,et al.  on the Recognition of Speech, with , 2008 .

[3]  A. Simmons Selectivity for harmonic structure in complex sounds by the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  Josh H. McDermott The cocktail party problem , 2009, Current Biology.

[5]  K. K. Jensen,et al.  Comodulation detection differences in the hooded crow (Corvus corone cornix), with direct comparison to human subjects. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Dukhwan Lim,et al.  Measurement of temporal regularity of spike train responses in auditory nerve fibers of the green treefrog , 1994, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  Joel Dudley,et al.  TimeTree: a public knowledge-base of divergence times among organisms , 2006, Bioinform..

[8]  Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Bottom-up and top-down influences on spatial unmasking , 2005 .

[9]  Alisha K Holloway,et al.  Polyploids with Different Origins and Ancestors Form a Single Sexual Polyploid Species , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[10]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Dip listening and the cocktail party problem in grey treefrogs: signal recognition in temporally fluctuating noise , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Sebastiaan W. F. Meenderink,et al.  Anatomy, Physiology, and Function of Auditory End-Organs in the Frog Inner Ear , 2007 .

[12]  C. J. Darwin,et al.  Chapter 11 – Auditory Grouping , 1995 .

[13]  Eric R. Thompson,et al.  Spatial release from masking as a function of the spectral overlap of competing talkers. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope’s gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size , 2014, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[15]  P. Narins,et al.  Hair cells, hearing and hopping: a field guide to hair cell physiology in the frog. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  Melissa K. Gregg,et al.  Attention, Awareness, and the Perception of Auditory Scenes , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[17]  H. C. Gerhardt,et al.  Call matching in the quacking frog (Crinia georgiana) , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  I. V. Stokkum Modelling the response of auditory midbrain neurons in the grassfrog to temporally structured monaural stimuli , 1990, Hearing Research.

[19]  D. Grantham,et al.  Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  J. Wiens,et al.  A PHYLOGENETIC PERSPECTIVE ON ELEVATIONAL SPECIES RICHNESS PATTERNS IN MIDDLE AMERICAN TREEFROGS: WHY SO FEW SPECIES IN LOWLAND TROPICAL RAINFORESTS? , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  W. Melssen,et al.  Measuring and modelling the response of auditory midbrain neurons in the grassfrog to temporally structured binaural stimuli. , 1991, Hearing research.

[22]  J. Schwartz,et al.  TESTS FOR CALL RESTORATION IN THE GRAY TREEFROG HYLA VERSICOLOR , 2011 .

[23]  Ryan C. Taylor,et al.  Faux frogs: multimodal signalling and the value of robotics in animal behaviour , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  H S Colburn,et al.  Speech intelligibility and localization in a multi-source environment. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. , 1998, Science.

[26]  J. Eggermont Peripheral auditory adaptation and fatigue: A model oriented review , 1985, Hearing Research.

[27]  Israel Nelken,et al.  Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds , 1999, Nature.

[28]  J. Schwartz THE FUNCTION OF CALL ALTERNATION IN ANURAN AMPHIBIANS: A TEST OF THREE HYPOTHESES , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  L. Mangiamele,et al.  Acoustic modulation of immediate early gene expression in the auditory midbrain of female túngara frogs , 2008, Brain Research.

[30]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Recognition and Localization of Acoustic Signals , 2007 .

[31]  M. Ryan,et al.  Functional Mapping of the Auditory Midbrain during Mate Call Reception , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Mark A Bee,et al.  Sound level discrimination by gray treefrogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  J. Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Directional hearing of awake, unrestrained treefrogs , 1986, Naturwissenschaften.

[34]  R. Gamelli,et al.  Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  R N Miles,et al.  The Development of a Biologically-Inspired Directional Microphone for Hearing Aids , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[36]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  SPECIATION BY POLYPLOIDY IN TREEFROGS: MULTIPLE ORIGINS OF THE TETRAPLOID, HYLA VERSICOLOR , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Spatial release from masking improves sound pattern discrimination along a biologically relevant pulse-rate continuum in gray treefrogs , 2013, Hearing Research.

[38]  John J. Wiens,et al.  Global Patterns of Diversification and Species Richness in Amphibians , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[39]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[40]  C. C. A. M. Gielen,et al.  A model for the peripheral auditory nervous system of the grassfrog , 1989, Hearing Research.

[41]  P. Narins,et al.  Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  A S Feng,et al.  Detection of auditory signals by frog inferior collicular neurons in the presence of spatially separated noise. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  A R Palmer,et al.  Mechanical properties of the frog ear: vibration measurements under free- and closed-field acoustic conditions , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[44]  Günter Ehret,et al.  Auditory masking and effects of noise on responses of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) to synthetic mating calls , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[45]  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Vertebrate pressure-gradient receivers , 2011, Hearing Research.

[46]  Mark A Bee,et al.  Spectral preferences and the role of spatial coherence in simultaneous integration in gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis). , 2010, Journal of comparative psychology.

[47]  D. Bodnar The separate and combined effects of harmonic structure, phase, and FM on female preferences in the barking treefrog (Hyla gratiosa) , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[48]  A. Simmons,et al.  Encoding of a spectrally-complex communication sound in the bullfrog's auditory nerve , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[49]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Auditory masking of anuran advertisement calls by road traffic noise , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Evolution of a sensory novelty: Tympanic ears and the associated neural processing , 2008, Brain Research Bulletin.

[51]  Matthew J. Mason,et al.  Pathways for Sound Transmission to the Inner Ear in Amphibians , 2007 .

[52]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  The auditory system of anuran amphibians , 1984, Progress in Neurobiology.

[53]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Note on informational masking (L) , 2003 .

[54]  H. Gustafsson,et al.  Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise , 1991 .

[55]  H. C. Gerhardt,et al.  Selective phonotaxis to advertisement calls in the gray treefrog Hyla versicolor: behavioral experiments and neurophysiological correlates , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[56]  Jim C. Hall Central Processing of Communication Sounds in the Anuran Auditory System , 1994 .

[57]  M. Konishi Coding of auditory space. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[58]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Effect of the orientation of the speaker's head and azimuth of a noise source on the speech reception threshold for sentences , 1980 .

[59]  Andrea Megela Simmons,et al.  The Sense of Hearing in Fishes and Amphibians , 1999 .

[60]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Spatially mediated release from auditory masking in an anuran amphibian , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[61]  Charles S. Watson,et al.  Some comments on informational masking , 2005 .

[62]  Gary J. Rose,et al.  Long-term temporal integration in the anuran auditory system , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[63]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.

[64]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Effects of masking noise on evoked calling in the Puerto Rican coqui (Anura: Leptodactylidae) , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[65]  B J Kwon,et al.  Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference? , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[66]  Robert P. Carlyon,et al.  Effects of Harmonicity and Regularity on the Perception of Sound Sources , 2008 .

[67]  D. Kelley,et al.  Vocal communication in frogs , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[68]  R. Carlyon How the brain separates sounds , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[69]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Does common spatial origin promote the auditory grouping of temporally separated signal elements in grey treefrogs? , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[70]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Neighbour–stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): II. Perceptual basis , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[71]  Mark A Bee,et al.  Signal recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) and Cope's gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis) in naturally fluctuating noise. , 2013, Journal of comparative psychology.

[72]  M. A. Bee,et al.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it? , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.

[73]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Speech processing for the hearing-impaired: successes, failures, and implications for speech mechanisms , 2003, Speech Commun..

[74]  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Spatial hearing in Cope’s gray treefrog: II. Frequency-dependent directionality in the amplitude and phase of tympanum vibrations , 2014, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[75]  M. Ryan,et al.  Relative comparisons of call parameters enable auditory grouping in frogs. , 2011, Nature communications.

[76]  N. C. Singh,et al.  Modulation spectra of natural sounds and ethological theories of auditory processing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[77]  Heiner Römer,et al.  Masking by Noise in Acoustic Insects: Problems and Solutions , 2013 .

[78]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Female green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) do not selectively respond to signals with a harmonic structure in noise , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[79]  T. Houtgast,et al.  A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria , 1985 .

[80]  D. Blumstein Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans : Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .

[81]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Evolutionary and neurobiological implications of selective phonotaxis in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[82]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Directional hearing in the gray tree frog Hyla versicolor: Eardrum vibrations and phonotaxis , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[83]  Anthony Arak,et al.  Sexual selection by male–male competition in natterjack toad choruses , 1983, Nature.

[84]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Multitasking males and multiplicative females: dynamic signalling and receiver preferences in Cope's grey treefrog , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[85]  Eliot A. Brenowitz,et al.  Species specificity and temperature dependency of temporal processing by the auditory midbrain of two species of treefrogs , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[86]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[87]  G. Kidd,et al.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[88]  G. Manley,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the tree frog Hyla cinerea , 2001, Hearing Research.

[89]  Makio Kashino,et al.  Phonemic restoration : The brain creates missing speech sounds , 2006 .

[90]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Two-tone suppression in auditory nerve fibers of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[91]  A. Simmons,et al.  Perception of mistuned harmonics in complex sounds by the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). , 2000, Journal of comparative psychology.

[92]  Jason A. Miranda,et al.  Female reproductive state influences the auditory midbrain response , 2009, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[93]  G. Rose,et al.  Auditory midbrain neurons that count , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[94]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[95]  C. Stosiek,et al.  In vivo two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[96]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Finding Your Mate at a Cocktail Party: Frequency Separation Promotes Auditory Stream Segregation of Concurrent Voices in Multi-Species Frog Choruses , 2011, PloS one.

[97]  R. Fay Signal-to-noise ratio for source determination and for a comodulated masker in goldfish, Carassius auratus. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[98]  P. Stephens,et al.  REPLICATE PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS, HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY, AND PHYLOGENY IN HOLARCTIC TREEFROGS , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[99]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Dip listening or modulation masking? Call recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) in temporally fluctuating noise , 2012, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[100]  P. I. M. Johannesma,et al.  Directional hearing in the grassfrog (Rana temporaria L.). II. Acoustics and modelling of the auditory periphery , 1986, Hearing Research.

[101]  Richard R. Fay,et al.  The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing , 1992, Springer New York.

[102]  Roger M. Carpenter,et al.  Auditory Perception: A New Analysis and Synthesis , 1999 .

[103]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  The effects of time, space and spectrum on auditory grouping in túngara frogs , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[104]  M. Ryan,et al.  Interactions of Multisensory Components Perceptually Rescue Túngara Frog Mating Signals , 2013, Science.

[105]  Cynthia F. Moss,et al.  Frequency selectivity of hearing in the green treefrog,Hyla cinerea , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[106]  Morten Buhl Jørgensen,et al.  Comparative studies of the biophysics of directional hearing in anurans , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[107]  J. Eggermont Wiener and Volterra analyses applied to the auditory system , 1993, Hearing Research.

[108]  S. Bacon,et al.  The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[109]  Jason A. Miranda,et al.  Sex differences and androgen influences on midbrain auditory thresholds in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea , 2009, Hearing Research.

[110]  J. Schul,et al.  Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[111]  G. Klump,et al.  Detecting modulated signals in modulated noise: (I) behavioural auditory thresholds in a songbird , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[112]  Paul F. Cranefield,et al.  Claude Bernard's revised edition of his Introduction à l'étude de la médecine expérimentale , 1977, Medical History.

[113]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Phonotaxis in Female Frogs and Toads: Execution and Design of Experiments , 1995 .

[114]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Spatial hearing in Cope’s gray treefrog: I. Open and closed loop experiments on sound localization in the presence and absence of noise , 2014, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[115]  Joshua J. Schwartz,et al.  Directionality of the Auditory System and Call Pattern Recognition During Acoustic Interference in the Gray Tree Frog , 1995 .

[116]  J. Schwartz,et al.  An Investigation of the Functional Significance of Responses of the Gray Treefrog (Hyla versicolor) to Chorus Noise , 2013 .

[117]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Do female frogs exploit inadvertent social information to locate breeding aggregations , 2007 .

[118]  H. Krebs The August Krogh Principle: "For many problems there is an animal on which it can be most conveniently studied". , 1975, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[119]  G. Klump,et al.  Comodulation masking release in a songbird , 1995, Hearing Research.

[120]  Thierry Aubin,et al.  Cocktail–party effect in king penguin colonies , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[121]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Directionality of the pressure-difference receiver ears in the northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[122]  M. Ferragamo,et al.  A model of anuran auditory periphery reveals frequency-dependent adaptation to be a contributing mechanism for two-tone suppression and amplitude modulation coding , 2011, Hearing Research.

[123]  M. A. Bee,et al.  All's well that begins Wells: celebrating 60 years of Animal Behaviour and 36 years of research on anuran social behaviour , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[124]  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Temporally selective processing of communication signals by auditory midbrain neurons. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[125]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Morphology and Physiology of the Auditory System , 1976 .

[126]  B G Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Spatial unmasking of nearby speech sources in a simulated anechoic environment. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[127]  L. V. Noorden Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences , 1975 .

[128]  Israel Nelken,et al.  Sound‐evoked network calcium transients in mouse auditory cortex in vivo , 2012, The Journal of physiology.

[129]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Correlation between auditory thalamic area evoked responses and species-specific call characteristics , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[130]  Lief E. Fenno,et al.  The development and application of optogenetics. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[131]  A S Feng,et al.  Sound localization in anurans. II. Binaural interaction in superior olivary nucleus of the green tree frog (Hyla cinerea). , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[132]  D D Dirks,et al.  The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[133]  P. van Dijk,et al.  Comparison between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and nerve fiber responses from the basilar papilla of the frog. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[134]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Spatial release from masking in a free-field source identification task by gray treefrogs , 2012, Hearing Research.

[135]  James J Finneran,et al.  Comodulation masking release in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[136]  P. Dijk,et al.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in seven frog species , 1996, Hearing Research.

[137]  D. Grigor'ev,et al.  Model of a neuron trained to extract periodicity , 2010 .

[138]  Albert S. Feng,et al.  Free-field unmasking response characteristics of frog auditory nerve fibers: comparison with the responses of midbrain auditory neurons , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[139]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Chapter 6 Anuran Acoustic Signal Perception in Noisy Environments , 2013 .

[140]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Properties of auditory stream formation , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[141]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Preferences based on spectral differences in acoustic signals in four species of treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae) , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[142]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  The evoked vocal response of the bullfrog- A study of communication by sound , 1966 .

[143]  A. Palmer,et al.  The directionality of the frog ear described by a mechanical model. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[144]  C. Moss,et al.  Behavioral audiograms of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) and the green tree frog (Hyla cinerea). , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[145]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Acoustic spectral preferences in two cryptic species of grey treefrogs: implications for mate choice and sensory mechanisms , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[146]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Hormone-induced vocal behavior and midbrain auditory sensitivity in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[147]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Anuran Acoustic Signal Production in Noisy Environments , 2013 .

[148]  Daniel Pressnitzer,et al.  The psychophysics and physiology of comodulation masking release , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[149]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor) , 2000 .

[150]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Testing an auditory illusion in frogs: perceptual restoration or sensory bias? , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[151]  A. Feng,et al.  Effects of Noise Bandwidth and Amplitude Modulation on Masking in Frog Auditory Midbrain Neurons , 2012, PloS one.

[152]  Greg Miller,et al.  Behavioral Neuroscience Uncaged , 2004, Science.

[153]  Robert R. Capranica,et al.  Masking patterns and filter characteristics of auditory nerve fibers in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[154]  Bernd Fritzsch,et al.  The Evolution of the amphibian auditory system , 1988 .

[155]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Acoustic communication in two groups of closely related treefrogs. , 2001 .

[156]  Johannes Schul,et al.  Sound Processing in Real-World Environments , 2007 .

[157]  A. Pyron,et al.  A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. , 2011, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[158]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Dynamic properties of the advertisement calls of gray tree frogs: patterns of variability and female choice , 1996 .

[159]  Mark A Bee,et al.  Behavioral measures of signal recognition thresholds in frogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[160]  Mark A Bee,et al.  Sound source perception in anuran amphibians , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[161]  R L Freyman,et al.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[162]  John R. Hershey,et al.  Monaural speech separation and recognition challenge , 2010, Comput. Speech Lang..

[163]  Jan W. H. Schnupp,et al.  On hearing with more than one ear: lessons from evolution , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[164]  Charles Darwin,et al.  Spatial Hearing and Perceiving Sources , 2008 .

[165]  H C Gerh,et al.  Localization of an Elevated Sound Source by the Green Tree Frog , 1982, Science.

[166]  S. Rumpel,et al.  Discrete Neocortical Dynamics Predict Behavioral Categorization of Sounds , 2012, Neuron.

[167]  T. Miyakawa,et al.  Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases , 2013 .

[168]  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Directional Hearing in Nonmammalian Tetrapods , 2005 .

[169]  C. M. Hillery,et al.  Seasonality of Two Midbrain Auditory Responses in the Treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis , 1984 .

[170]  R Plomp,et al.  Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[171]  H. C. Gerhardt,et al.  Sound localization in the barking treefrog , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[172]  Ira J. Hirsh,et al.  The Relation between Localization and Intelligibility , 1950 .

[173]  J. Schul,et al.  A quantitative analysis of behavioral selectivity for pulse rise-time in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[174]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Effects of heterospecific call overlap on the phonotactic behaviour of grey treefrogs , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[175]  R. H. Wiley,et al.  Reverberations and Amplitude Fluctuations in the Propagation of Sound in a Forest: Implications for Animal Communication , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[176]  T. Aubin,et al.  How to vocally identify kin in a crowd: The penguin model , 2002 .

[177]  S. Shamma,et al.  Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.

[178]  C J Darwin,et al.  Listening to speech in the presence of other sounds , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[179]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Neighbour–stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): I. Acoustic basis , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[180]  Andrew J King,et al.  Auditory Neuroscience: Filling in the Gaps , 2007, Current Biology.

[181]  G. Fellers Aggression, territoriality, and mating behaviour in North American treefrogs , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[182]  James J Finneran,et al.  Auditory masking patterns in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) with natural, anthropogenic, and synthesized noise. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[183]  Alejandro Vélez,et al.  Signal recognition by frogs in the presence of temporally fluctuating chorus-shaped noise , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[184]  R. Fay,et al.  Forward masking and suppression in the midbrain of the southern grey treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[185]  Albert S Feng,et al.  GABA Is Involved in Spatial Unmasking in the Frog Auditory Midbrain , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[186]  M. Ryan,et al.  The Effects of Spatially Separated Call Components on Phonotaxis in Túngara Frogs: Evidence for Auditory Grouping , 2002, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[187]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Pulse-number discrimination by Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) in modulated and unmodulated noise. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[188]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Sound source segregation in grey treefrogs: spatial release from masking by the sound of a chorus , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[189]  A N Popper,et al.  Evolution of the ear and hearing: issues and questions. , 1997, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[190]  A. Simmons,et al.  Perception of complex sounds by the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea: envelope and fine-structure cues , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[191]  H. C. Gerhardt,et al.  Directional hearing in the green treefrog: A variable mechanism? , 1981, Naturwissenschaften.

[192]  Cynthia F. Moss,et al.  Reflex Modification: A Tool for Assessing Basic Auditory Function in Anuran Amphibians , 1995 .

[193]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Parallel female preferences for call duration in a diploid ancestor of an allotetraploid treefrog , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[194]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians , 2010 .

[195]  A. Simmons “To Ear is Human, to Frogive is Divine”: Bob Capranica’s legacy to auditory neuroethology , 2012, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[196]  Stewart H. Hulse,et al.  Auditory scene analysis in animal communication , 2002 .

[197]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Interference risk and the function of dynamic shifts in calling in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor). , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.

[198]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Hybridization in the Diploid-Tetraploid Treefrogs Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor , 1994 .

[199]  K. Schrode,et al.  Female preferences for spectral call properties in the western genetic lineage of Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) , 2012, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[200]  P. Narins,et al.  AM representation in green treefrog auditory nerve fibers: neuroethological implications for pattern recognition and sound localization , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[201]  Frédéric Berthommier,et al.  Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise , 2006, Hearing Research.

[202]  I. Straughan,et al.  Functional aspects of anuran middle ear structures. , 1974, The Journal of experimental biology.

[203]  J. Doherty,et al.  Acoustic communication in the gray treefrog,Hyla versicolor: evolutionary and neurobiological implications , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[204]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Processing amplitude-modulated sounds by the auditory midbrain of two species of toads: matched temporal filters , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[205]  Mark S. Davis,et al.  Acoustically mediated neighbor recognition in the North American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[206]  Robert R. Capranica,et al.  Accuracy of phonotaxis by the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[207]  G. Rose,et al.  Interval-counting neurons in the anuran auditory midbrain: factors underlying diversity of interval tuning , 2010, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[208]  R. Fay,et al.  Evolution of hearing in vertebrates: the inner ears and processing , 2000, Hearing Research.

[209]  Charles Darwin,et al.  Pitch and auditory grouping , 2005 .

[210]  Sue L. Denham,et al.  Modelling the Emergence and Dynamics of Perceptual Organisation in Auditory Streaming , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[211]  Robert R. Capranica,et al.  Neurobehavioral Correlates of Sound Communication in Anurans , 1983 .

[212]  J. Wiens,et al.  A Revised Phylogeny of Holarctic Treefrogs (Genus Hyla) Based on Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA Sequences , 2009 .

[213]  Georg M. Klump,et al.  Masking of acoustic signals by the chorus background noise in the green tree frog: A limitation on mate choice , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[214]  G. Manley,et al.  Evolution of the Vertebrate Auditory System , 2004, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[215]  F. Jacob,et al.  Evolution and tinkering. , 1977, Science.

[216]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Female mate choice in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) in three experimental environments , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[217]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Finding a mate at a cocktail party: spatial release from masking improves acoustic mate recognition in grey treefrogs , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[218]  R Plomp,et al.  The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[219]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Individual voice recognition in a territorial frog (Rana catesbeiana) , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.