Treefrogs as animal models for research on auditory scene analysis and the cocktail party problem.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Ryan,et al. The behavioral neuroscience of anuran social signal processing , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[2] E. C. Cmm,et al. on the Recognition of Speech, with , 2008 .
[3] A. Simmons. Selectivity for harmonic structure in complex sounds by the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[4] Josh H. McDermott. The cocktail party problem , 2009, Current Biology.
[5] K. K. Jensen,et al. Comodulation detection differences in the hooded crow (Corvus corone cornix), with direct comparison to human subjects. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] Dukhwan Lim,et al. Measurement of temporal regularity of spike train responses in auditory nerve fibers of the green treefrog , 1994, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[7] Joel Dudley,et al. TimeTree: a public knowledge-base of divergence times among organisms , 2006, Bioinform..
[8] Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham,et al. Bottom-up and top-down influences on spatial unmasking , 2005 .
[9] Alisha K Holloway,et al. Polyploids with Different Origins and Ancestors Form a Single Sexual Polyploid Species , 2006, The American Naturalist.
[10] Mark A. Bee,et al. Dip listening and the cocktail party problem in grey treefrogs: signal recognition in temporally fluctuating noise , 2011, Animal Behaviour.
[11] Sebastiaan W. F. Meenderink,et al. Anatomy, Physiology, and Function of Auditory End-Organs in the Frog Inner Ear , 2007 .
[12] C. J. Darwin,et al. Chapter 11 – Auditory Grouping , 1995 .
[13] Eric R. Thompson,et al. Spatial release from masking as a function of the spectral overlap of competing talkers. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] Mark A. Bee,et al. Auditory brainstem responses in Cope’s gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size , 2014, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[15] P. Narins,et al. Hair cells, hearing and hopping: a field guide to hair cell physiology in the frog. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.
[16] Melissa K. Gregg,et al. Attention, Awareness, and the Perception of Auditory Scenes , 2011, Front. Psychology.
[17] H. C. Gerhardt,et al. Call matching in the quacking frog (Crinia georgiana) , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[18] I. V. Stokkum. Modelling the response of auditory midbrain neurons in the grassfrog to temporally structured monaural stimuli , 1990, Hearing Research.
[19] D. Grantham,et al. Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] J. Wiens,et al. A PHYLOGENETIC PERSPECTIVE ON ELEVATIONAL SPECIES RICHNESS PATTERNS IN MIDDLE AMERICAN TREEFROGS: WHY SO FEW SPECIES IN LOWLAND TROPICAL RAINFORESTS? , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[21] W. Melssen,et al. Measuring and modelling the response of auditory midbrain neurons in the grassfrog to temporally structured binaural stimuli. , 1991, Hearing research.
[22] J. Schwartz,et al. TESTS FOR CALL RESTORATION IN THE GRAY TREEFROG HYLA VERSICOLOR , 2011 .
[23] Ryan C. Taylor,et al. Faux frogs: multimodal signalling and the value of robotics in animal behaviour , 2008, Animal Behaviour.
[24] H S Colburn,et al. Speech intelligibility and localization in a multi-source environment. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] R. D. Semlitsch,et al. Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. , 1998, Science.
[26] J. Eggermont. Peripheral auditory adaptation and fatigue: A model oriented review , 1985, Hearing Research.
[27] Israel Nelken,et al. Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds , 1999, Nature.
[28] J. Schwartz. THE FUNCTION OF CALL ALTERNATION IN ANURAN AMPHIBIANS: A TEST OF THREE HYPOTHESES , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[29] L. Mangiamele,et al. Acoustic modulation of immediate early gene expression in the auditory midbrain of female túngara frogs , 2008, Brain Research.
[30] Mark A. Bee,et al. Recognition and Localization of Acoustic Signals , 2007 .
[31] M. Ryan,et al. Functional Mapping of the Auditory Midbrain during Mate Call Reception , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[32] Mark A Bee,et al. Sound level discrimination by gray treefrogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] J. Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al. Directional hearing of awake, unrestrained treefrogs , 1986, Naturwissenschaften.
[34] R. Gamelli,et al. Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[35] R N Miles,et al. The Development of a Biologically-Inspired Directional Microphone for Hearing Aids , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.
[36] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. SPECIATION BY POLYPLOIDY IN TREEFROGS: MULTIPLE ORIGINS OF THE TETRAPLOID, HYLA VERSICOLOR , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[37] Mark A. Bee,et al. Spatial release from masking improves sound pattern discrimination along a biologically relevant pulse-rate continuum in gray treefrogs , 2013, Hearing Research.
[38] John J. Wiens,et al. Global Patterns of Diversification and Species Richness in Amphibians , 2007, The American Naturalist.
[39] Albert S. Bregman,et al. The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .
[40] C. C. A. M. Gielen,et al. A model for the peripheral auditory nervous system of the grassfrog , 1989, Hearing Research.
[41] P. Narins,et al. Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[42] A S Feng,et al. Detection of auditory signals by frog inferior collicular neurons in the presence of spatially separated noise. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.
[43] A R Palmer,et al. Mechanical properties of the frog ear: vibration measurements under free- and closed-field acoustic conditions , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[44] Günter Ehret,et al. Auditory masking and effects of noise on responses of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) to synthetic mating calls , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.
[45] Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al. Vertebrate pressure-gradient receivers , 2011, Hearing Research.
[46] Mark A Bee,et al. Spectral preferences and the role of spatial coherence in simultaneous integration in gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis). , 2010, Journal of comparative psychology.
[47] D. Bodnar. The separate and combined effects of harmonic structure, phase, and FM on female preferences in the barking treefrog (Hyla gratiosa) , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[48] A. Simmons,et al. Encoding of a spectrally-complex communication sound in the bullfrog's auditory nerve , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[49] Mark A. Bee,et al. Auditory masking of anuran advertisement calls by road traffic noise , 2007, Animal Behaviour.
[50] Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al. Evolution of a sensory novelty: Tympanic ears and the associated neural processing , 2008, Brain Research Bulletin.
[51] Matthew J. Mason,et al. Pathways for Sound Transmission to the Inner Ear in Amphibians , 2007 .
[52] R. R. Capranica,et al. The auditory system of anuran amphibians , 1984, Progress in Neurobiology.
[53] B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al. Note on informational masking (L) , 2003 .
[54] H. Gustafsson,et al. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise , 1991 .
[55] H. C. Gerhardt,et al. Selective phonotaxis to advertisement calls in the gray treefrog Hyla versicolor: behavioral experiments and neurophysiological correlates , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[56] Jim C. Hall. Central Processing of Communication Sounds in the Anuran Auditory System , 1994 .
[57] M. Konishi. Coding of auditory space. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.
[58] A. M. Mimpen,et al. Effect of the orientation of the speaker's head and azimuth of a noise source on the speech reception threshold for sentences , 1980 .
[59] Andrea Megela Simmons,et al. The Sense of Hearing in Fishes and Amphibians , 1999 .
[60] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Spatially mediated release from auditory masking in an anuran amphibian , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[61] Charles S. Watson,et al. Some comments on informational masking , 2005 .
[62] Gary J. Rose,et al. Long-term temporal integration in the anuran auditory system , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.
[63] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.
[64] Peter M. Narins,et al. Effects of masking noise on evoked calling in the Puerto Rican coqui (Anura: Leptodactylidae) , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.
[65] B J Kwon,et al. Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference? , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[66] Robert P. Carlyon,et al. Effects of Harmonicity and Regularity on the Perception of Sound Sources , 2008 .
[67] D. Kelley,et al. Vocal communication in frogs , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[68] R. Carlyon. How the brain separates sounds , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[69] Mark A. Bee,et al. Does common spatial origin promote the auditory grouping of temporally separated signal elements in grey treefrogs? , 2008, Animal Behaviour.
[70] H. Gerhardt,et al. Neighbour–stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): II. Perceptual basis , 2001, Animal Behaviour.
[71] Mark A Bee,et al. Signal recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) and Cope's gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis) in naturally fluctuating noise. , 2013, Journal of comparative psychology.
[72] M. A. Bee,et al. The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it? , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.
[73] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. Speech processing for the hearing-impaired: successes, failures, and implications for speech mechanisms , 2003, Speech Commun..
[74] Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al. Spatial hearing in Cope’s gray treefrog: II. Frequency-dependent directionality in the amplitude and phase of tympanum vibrations , 2014, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[75] M. Ryan,et al. Relative comparisons of call parameters enable auditory grouping in frogs. , 2011, Nature communications.
[76] N. C. Singh,et al. Modulation spectra of natural sounds and ethological theories of auditory processing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[77] Heiner Römer,et al. Masking by Noise in Acoustic Insects: Problems and Solutions , 2013 .
[78] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Female green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) do not selectively respond to signals with a harmonic structure in noise , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[79] T. Houtgast,et al. A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria , 1985 .
[80] D. Blumstein. Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans : Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .
[81] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Evolutionary and neurobiological implications of selective phonotaxis in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea , 1987, Animal Behaviour.
[82] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Directional hearing in the gray tree frog Hyla versicolor: Eardrum vibrations and phonotaxis , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[83] Anthony Arak,et al. Sexual selection by male–male competition in natterjack toad choruses , 1983, Nature.
[84] Mark A. Bee,et al. Multitasking males and multiplicative females: dynamic signalling and receiver preferences in Cope's grey treefrog , 2013, Animal Behaviour.
[85] Eliot A. Brenowitz,et al. Species specificity and temperature dependency of temporal processing by the auditory midbrain of two species of treefrogs , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[86] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[87] G. Kidd,et al. The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[88] G. Manley,et al. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the tree frog Hyla cinerea , 2001, Hearing Research.
[89] Makio Kashino,et al. Phonemic restoration : The brain creates missing speech sounds , 2006 .
[90] R. R. Capranica,et al. Two-tone suppression in auditory nerve fibers of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[91] A. Simmons,et al. Perception of mistuned harmonics in complex sounds by the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). , 2000, Journal of comparative psychology.
[92] Jason A. Miranda,et al. Female reproductive state influences the auditory midbrain response , 2009, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[93] G. Rose,et al. Auditory midbrain neurons that count , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[94] B Kollmeier,et al. Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[95] C. Stosiek,et al. In vivo two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[96] Mark A. Bee,et al. Finding Your Mate at a Cocktail Party: Frequency Separation Promotes Auditory Stream Segregation of Concurrent Voices in Multi-Species Frog Choruses , 2011, PloS one.
[97] R. Fay. Signal-to-noise ratio for source determination and for a comodulated masker in goldfish, Carassius auratus. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[98] P. Stephens,et al. REPLICATE PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS, HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY, AND PHYLOGENY IN HOLARCTIC TREEFROGS , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[99] M. A. Bee,et al. Dip listening or modulation masking? Call recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) in temporally fluctuating noise , 2012, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[100] P. I. M. Johannesma,et al. Directional hearing in the grassfrog (Rana temporaria L.). II. Acoustics and modelling of the auditory periphery , 1986, Hearing Research.
[101] Richard R. Fay,et al. The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing , 1992, Springer New York.
[102] Roger M. Carpenter,et al. Auditory Perception: A New Analysis and Synthesis , 1999 .
[103] Michael J. Ryan,et al. The effects of time, space and spectrum on auditory grouping in túngara frogs , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[104] M. Ryan,et al. Interactions of Multisensory Components Perceptually Rescue Túngara Frog Mating Signals , 2013, Science.
[105] Cynthia F. Moss,et al. Frequency selectivity of hearing in the green treefrog,Hyla cinerea , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[106] Morten Buhl Jørgensen,et al. Comparative studies of the biophysics of directional hearing in anurans , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[107] J. Eggermont. Wiener and Volterra analyses applied to the auditory system , 1993, Hearing Research.
[108] S. Bacon,et al. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[109] Jason A. Miranda,et al. Sex differences and androgen influences on midbrain auditory thresholds in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea , 2009, Hearing Research.
[110] J. Schul,et al. Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[111] G. Klump,et al. Detecting modulated signals in modulated noise: (I) behavioural auditory thresholds in a songbird , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.
[112] Paul F. Cranefield,et al. Claude Bernard's revised edition of his Introduction à l'étude de la médecine expérimentale , 1977, Medical History.
[113] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Phonotaxis in Female Frogs and Toads: Execution and Design of Experiments , 1995 .
[114] Mark A. Bee,et al. Spatial hearing in Cope’s gray treefrog: I. Open and closed loop experiments on sound localization in the presence and absence of noise , 2014, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[115] Joshua J. Schwartz,et al. Directionality of the Auditory System and Call Pattern Recognition During Acoustic Interference in the Gray Tree Frog , 1995 .
[116] J. Schwartz,et al. An Investigation of the Functional Significance of Responses of the Gray Treefrog (Hyla versicolor) to Chorus Noise , 2013 .
[117] Mark A. Bee,et al. Do female frogs exploit inadvertent social information to locate breeding aggregations , 2007 .
[118] H. Krebs. The August Krogh Principle: "For many problems there is an animal on which it can be most conveniently studied". , 1975, The Journal of experimental zoology.
[119] G. Klump,et al. Comodulation masking release in a songbird , 1995, Hearing Research.
[120] Thierry Aubin,et al. Cocktail–party effect in king penguin colonies , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[121] Peter M. Narins,et al. Directionality of the pressure-difference receiver ears in the northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[122] M. Ferragamo,et al. A model of anuran auditory periphery reveals frequency-dependent adaptation to be a contributing mechanism for two-tone suppression and amplitude modulation coding , 2011, Hearing Research.
[123] M. A. Bee,et al. All's well that begins Wells: celebrating 60 years of Animal Behaviour and 36 years of research on anuran social behaviour , 2013, Animal Behaviour.
[124] Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al. Temporally selective processing of communication signals by auditory midbrain neurons. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.
[125] R. R. Capranica,et al. Morphology and Physiology of the Auditory System , 1976 .
[126] B G Shinn-Cunningham,et al. Spatial unmasking of nearby speech sources in a simulated anechoic environment. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[127] L. V. Noorden. Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences , 1975 .
[128] Israel Nelken,et al. Sound‐evoked network calcium transients in mouse auditory cortex in vivo , 2012, The Journal of physiology.
[129] R. R. Capranica,et al. Correlation between auditory thalamic area evoked responses and species-specific call characteristics , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[130] Lief E. Fenno,et al. The development and application of optogenetics. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.
[131] A S Feng,et al. Sound localization in anurans. II. Binaural interaction in superior olivary nucleus of the green tree frog (Hyla cinerea). , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.
[132] D D Dirks,et al. The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[133] P. van Dijk,et al. Comparison between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and nerve fiber responses from the basilar papilla of the frog. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[134] Mark A. Bee,et al. Spatial release from masking in a free-field source identification task by gray treefrogs , 2012, Hearing Research.
[135] James J Finneran,et al. Comodulation masking release in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[136] P. Dijk,et al. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in seven frog species , 1996, Hearing Research.
[137] D. Grigor'ev,et al. Model of a neuron trained to extract periodicity , 2010 .
[138] Albert S. Feng,et al. Free-field unmasking response characteristics of frog auditory nerve fibers: comparison with the responses of midbrain auditory neurons , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[139] Mark A. Bee,et al. Chapter 6 Anuran Acoustic Signal Perception in Noisy Environments , 2013 .
[140] Brian C J Moore,et al. Properties of auditory stream formation , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[141] H. Gerhardt,et al. Preferences based on spectral differences in acoustic signals in four species of treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae) , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.
[142] R. R. Capranica,et al. The evoked vocal response of the bullfrog- A study of communication by sound , 1966 .
[143] A. Palmer,et al. The directionality of the frog ear described by a mechanical model. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.
[144] C. Moss,et al. Behavioral audiograms of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) and the green tree frog (Hyla cinerea). , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[145] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Acoustic spectral preferences in two cryptic species of grey treefrogs: implications for mate choice and sensory mechanisms , 2005, Animal Behaviour.
[146] R. R. Capranica,et al. Hormone-induced vocal behavior and midbrain auditory sensitivity in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[147] Mark A. Bee,et al. Anuran Acoustic Signal Production in Noisy Environments , 2013 .
[148] Daniel Pressnitzer,et al. The psychophysics and physiology of comodulation masking release , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.
[149] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor) , 2000 .
[150] M. A. Bee,et al. Testing an auditory illusion in frogs: perceptual restoration or sensory bias? , 2010, Animal Behaviour.
[151] A. Feng,et al. Effects of Noise Bandwidth and Amplitude Modulation on Masking in Frog Auditory Midbrain Neurons , 2012, PloS one.
[152] Greg Miller,et al. Behavioral Neuroscience Uncaged , 2004, Science.
[153] Robert R. Capranica,et al. Masking patterns and filter characteristics of auditory nerve fibers in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.
[154] Bernd Fritzsch,et al. The Evolution of the amphibian auditory system , 1988 .
[155] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Acoustic communication in two groups of closely related treefrogs. , 2001 .
[156] Johannes Schul,et al. Sound Processing in Real-World Environments , 2007 .
[157] A. Pyron,et al. A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. , 2011, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[158] H. Gerhardt,et al. Dynamic properties of the advertisement calls of gray tree frogs: patterns of variability and female choice , 1996 .
[159] Mark A Bee,et al. Behavioral measures of signal recognition thresholds in frogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[160] Mark A Bee,et al. Sound source perception in anuran amphibians , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[161] R L Freyman,et al. The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[162] John R. Hershey,et al. Monaural speech separation and recognition challenge , 2010, Comput. Speech Lang..
[163] Jan W. H. Schnupp,et al. On hearing with more than one ear: lessons from evolution , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.
[164] Charles Darwin,et al. Spatial Hearing and Perceiving Sources , 2008 .
[165] H C Gerh,et al. Localization of an Elevated Sound Source by the Green Tree Frog , 1982, Science.
[166] S. Rumpel,et al. Discrete Neocortical Dynamics Predict Behavioral Categorization of Sounds , 2012, Neuron.
[167] T. Miyakawa,et al. Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases , 2013 .
[168] Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al. Directional Hearing in Nonmammalian Tetrapods , 2005 .
[169] C. M. Hillery,et al. Seasonality of Two Midbrain Auditory Responses in the Treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis , 1984 .
[170] R Plomp,et al. Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[171] H. C. Gerhardt,et al. Sound localization in the barking treefrog , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.
[172] Ira J. Hirsh,et al. The Relation between Localization and Intelligibility , 1950 .
[173] J. Schul,et al. A quantitative analysis of behavioral selectivity for pulse rise-time in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[174] H. Gerhardt,et al. Effects of heterospecific call overlap on the phonotactic behaviour of grey treefrogs , 2006, Animal Behaviour.
[175] R. H. Wiley,et al. Reverberations and Amplitude Fluctuations in the Propagation of Sound in a Forest: Implications for Animal Communication , 1980, The American Naturalist.
[176] T. Aubin,et al. How to vocally identify kin in a crowd: The penguin model , 2002 .
[177] S. Shamma,et al. Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.
[178] C J Darwin,et al. Listening to speech in the presence of other sounds , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[179] Mark A. Bee,et al. Neighbour–stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): I. Acoustic basis , 2001, Animal Behaviour.
[180] Andrew J King,et al. Auditory Neuroscience: Filling in the Gaps , 2007, Current Biology.
[181] G. Fellers. Aggression, territoriality, and mating behaviour in North American treefrogs , 1979, Animal Behaviour.
[182] James J Finneran,et al. Auditory masking patterns in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) with natural, anthropogenic, and synthesized noise. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[183] Alejandro Vélez,et al. Signal recognition by frogs in the presence of temporally fluctuating chorus-shaped noise , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[184] R. Fay,et al. Forward masking and suppression in the midbrain of the southern grey treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.
[185] Albert S Feng,et al. GABA Is Involved in Spatial Unmasking in the Frog Auditory Midbrain , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[186] M. Ryan,et al. The Effects of Spatially Separated Call Components on Phonotaxis in Túngara Frogs: Evidence for Auditory Grouping , 2002, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.
[187] M. A. Bee,et al. Pulse-number discrimination by Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) in modulated and unmodulated noise. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[188] M. A. Bee,et al. Sound source segregation in grey treefrogs: spatial release from masking by the sound of a chorus , 2007, Animal Behaviour.
[189] A N Popper,et al. Evolution of the ear and hearing: issues and questions. , 1997, Brain, behavior and evolution.
[190] A. Simmons,et al. Perception of complex sounds by the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea: envelope and fine-structure cues , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[191] H. C. Gerhardt,et al. Directional hearing in the green treefrog: A variable mechanism? , 1981, Naturwissenschaften.
[192] Cynthia F. Moss,et al. Reflex Modification: A Tool for Assessing Basic Auditory Function in Anuran Amphibians , 1995 .
[193] Mark A. Bee,et al. Parallel female preferences for call duration in a diploid ancestor of an allotetraploid treefrog , 2008, Animal Behaviour.
[194] Peter M. Narins,et al. Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians , 2010 .
[195] A. Simmons. “To Ear is Human, to Frogive is Divine”: Bob Capranica’s legacy to auditory neuroethology , 2012, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[196] Stewart H. Hulse,et al. Auditory scene analysis in animal communication , 2002 .
[197] J. Schwartz,et al. Interference risk and the function of dynamic shifts in calling in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor). , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.
[198] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Hybridization in the Diploid-Tetraploid Treefrogs Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor , 1994 .
[199] K. Schrode,et al. Female preferences for spectral call properties in the western genetic lineage of Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) , 2012, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[200] P. Narins,et al. AM representation in green treefrog auditory nerve fibers: neuroethological implications for pattern recognition and sound localization , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[201] Frédéric Berthommier,et al. Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise , 2006, Hearing Research.
[202] I. Straughan,et al. Functional aspects of anuran middle ear structures. , 1974, The Journal of experimental biology.
[203] J. Doherty,et al. Acoustic communication in the gray treefrog,Hyla versicolor: evolutionary and neurobiological implications , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[204] R. R. Capranica,et al. Processing amplitude-modulated sounds by the auditory midbrain of two species of toads: matched temporal filters , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[205] Mark S. Davis,et al. Acoustically mediated neighbor recognition in the North American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[206] Robert R. Capranica,et al. Accuracy of phonotaxis by the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.
[207] G. Rose,et al. Interval-counting neurons in the anuran auditory midbrain: factors underlying diversity of interval tuning , 2010, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[208] R. Fay,et al. Evolution of hearing in vertebrates: the inner ears and processing , 2000, Hearing Research.
[209] Charles Darwin,et al. Pitch and auditory grouping , 2005 .
[210] Sue L. Denham,et al. Modelling the Emergence and Dynamics of Perceptual Organisation in Auditory Streaming , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[211] Robert R. Capranica,et al. Neurobehavioral Correlates of Sound Communication in Anurans , 1983 .
[212] J. Wiens,et al. A Revised Phylogeny of Holarctic Treefrogs (Genus Hyla) Based on Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA Sequences , 2009 .
[213] Georg M. Klump,et al. Masking of acoustic signals by the chorus background noise in the green tree frog: A limitation on mate choice , 1988, Animal Behaviour.
[214] G. Manley,et al. Evolution of the Vertebrate Auditory System , 2004, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.
[215] F. Jacob,et al. Evolution and tinkering. , 1977, Science.
[216] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Female mate choice in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) in three experimental environments , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[217] Mark A. Bee,et al. Finding a mate at a cocktail party: spatial release from masking improves acoustic mate recognition in grey treefrogs , 2008, Animal Behaviour.
[218] R Plomp,et al. The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[219] H. Gerhardt,et al. Individual voice recognition in a territorial frog (Rana catesbeiana) , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.