Spatial Climate Variability and Its Impact on Irrigated Hydrology in a Canal Command

Depth to watertable continuously increases from head to tail in most of the canal commands in Punjab, Pakistan, in spite of equitable canal water supplies. In the wake of increased groundwater use with passage of time, the tail end farming community and irrigation management institutions are to confront this emerging issue very prudently. To comprehend this dilemma, canal water availability, crop water requirement and groundwater recharge across the Lower Bari Doab Canal command were analyzed. Annual rainfall decreases towards tail (212 mm) as compared to head (472 mm), in contrary, annual gross and net crop water requirement at tail end are 10.2 and 32.5% higher, respectively, as compared to head end. As a result, groundwater mining is taking place in tail end at 0.34 m/year, whereas in head end areas, the situation is stable. Actually, in tail end areas, groundwater recharge rates are considerably low as compared to the head end. Spatial climate variability across the command is the main cause for these inequities. Reallocation of canal water and/or enhancing recharge to groundwater in these relatively more water stressed areas during wet years needs to be sought, otherwise any groundwater management activity in this regard will not have any technical and social viability. Ignoring climatic variability within the canal command is one of the serious issues in irrigation system design that prevents achieving the optimal level of conjunctive water use and as a result, the highest potential agricultural output cannot be achieved.

[1]  M. Kuper,et al.  Irrigation management in the Fordwah Branch Command Area, Southeast Punjab, Pakistan , 1992 .

[2]  Laurence Smith Assessment of the contribution of irrigation to poverty reduction and sustainable livelihoods , 2004 .

[3]  Asit K. Biswas,et al.  Integrated Water Resources Management: Is It Working? , 2008 .

[4]  M. Latif,et al.  Groundwater and soil salinity variations in a canal command area in Pakistan , 2009 .

[5]  M. Latif Spatial productivity along a canal irrigation system in Pakistan , 2007 .

[6]  Hugh Turral,et al.  Diagnosing irrigation performance and water productivity through satellite remote sensing and secondary data in a large irrigation system of Pakistan , 2009 .

[7]  Vander Velde Performance assessment in a large irrigation system in Pakistan: opportunities for improvement at the distributary level , 1990 .

[8]  Zaigham Habib,et al.  Spatial distribution of reference and potential evapotranspiration across the Indus Basin Irrigation Systems , 2001 .

[9]  Asad Sarwar Qureshi,et al.  Sustainable groundwater management in Pakistan: challenges and opportunities , 2008 .

[10]  Muhammad Latif,et al.  Proposal for equitable water allocation for rotational irrigation in Pakistan , 1994 .

[11]  M. Jurriens,et al.  Scarcity by design: Protective irrigation in India and Pakistan , 1996 .

[12]  M. G. Bos,et al.  Performance assessment, irrigation service delivery and poverty reduction: benefits of improved system management , 2007 .

[13]  Muhammad Nawaz Bhutta,et al.  Equity of water distribution along secondary canals in Punjab, Pakistan , 1992 .

[14]  A. K. Yadav,et al.  A model for equitable distribution of canal water , 2000, Irrigation Science.

[15]  A. Shah,et al.  Socio-ecology of groundwater irrigation in India. IWMI-TATA Water Policy Research Program Annual Partners' Meet, 2002 , 2003 .

[16]  Shahid Bahonar,et al.  EFFECT OF GROUNDWATER TABLE DECLINE ON GROUNDWATER QUALITY IN SIRJAN WATERSHED , 2010 .

[17]  S. Adnan Effective Rainfall for Irrigated Agriculture Plains of Pakistan , 2009 .

[18]  M. Kujawa,et al.  FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper. Pesticide Residues in Food — 1977, Evaluations 1977. 459 Seiten. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome 1978. Preis: 9,90 $ , 1980 .