High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin on Presentation to Rule Out Myocardial Infarction

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays enable myocardial infarction to be ruled out earlier, but the safety and efficacy of this approach is uncertain. We investigated whether an early rule-out pathway is safe and effective for patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Methods: We performed a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial in the emergency departments of 7 acute care hospitals in Scotland. Consecutive patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome between December 2014 and December 2016 were included. Sites were randomized to implement an early rule-out pathway where myocardial infarction was excluded if high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentrations were <5 ng/L at presentation. During a previous validation phase, myocardial infarction was ruled out when troponin concentrations were <99th percentile at 6 to 12 hours after symptom onset. The coprimary outcome was length of stay (efficacy) and myocardial infarction or cardiac death after discharge at 30 days (safety). Patients were followed for 1 year to evaluate safety and other secondary outcomes. Results: We enrolled 31 492 patients (59±17 years of age [mean±SD]; 45% women) with troponin concentrations <99th percentile at presentation. Length of stay was reduced from 10.1±4.1 to 6.8±3.9 hours (adjusted geometric mean ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.73–0.83]; P<0.001) after implementation and the proportion of patients discharged increased from 50% to 71% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.45–1.75]). Noninferiority was not demonstrated for the 30-day safety outcome (upper limit of 1-sided 95% CI for adjusted risk difference, 0.70% [noninferiority margin 0.50%]; P=0.068), but the observed differences favored the early rule-out pathway (0.4% [57/14 700] versus 0.3% [56/16 792]). At 1 year, the safety outcome occurred in 2.7% (396/14 700) and 1.8% (307/16 792) of patients before and after implementation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.74–1.40]; P=0.894), and there were no differences in hospital reattendance or all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Implementation of an early rule-out pathway for myocardial infarction reduced length of stay and hospital admission. Although noninferiority for the safety outcome was not demonstrated at 30 days, there was no increase in cardiac events at 1 year. Adoption of this pathway would have major benefits for patients and health care providers. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03005158.

[1]  Correction to: A Randomized Trial of a 1-Hour Troponin T Protocol in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndromes: The Rapid Assessment of Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department With High-Sensitivity Troponin T Study (RAPID-TnT). , 2021, Circulation.

[2]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. , 2020, European heart journal.

[3]  J. Benger,et al.  Limit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trial , 2020, Heart.

[4]  N. Mills,et al.  Risk Stratification Using High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  P. Collinson,et al.  High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction , 2019, Circulation.

[6]  D. Newby,et al.  High-Sensitivity Troponin and the Application of Risk Stratification Thresholds in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome , 2019, Circulation.

[7]  R. Bingisser,et al.  Outcome of Applying the ESC 0/1-hour Algorithm in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Yaiza Beatriz Molero-Díez,et al.  Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2019, Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology.

[9]  A. Peters,et al.  Application of High-Sensitivity Troponin in Suspected Myocardial Infarction. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  B. Lindahl,et al.  A Rule‐Out Strategy Based on High‐Sensitivity Troponin and HEART Score Reduces Hospital Admissions , 2019, Annals of emergency medicine.

[11]  David E Newby,et al.  Novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome , 2018, Heart.

[12]  Kristian Thygesen,et al.  Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  C. Fischbacher,et al.  High-sensitivity troponin in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial , 2018, The Lancet.

[14]  J. Greenslade,et al.  Evaluating Rapid Rule-out of Acute Myocardial Infarction Using a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assay at Presentation. , 2018, Clinical chemistry.

[15]  J. Greenslade,et al.  Association of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Concentration With Cardiac Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome , 2017, JAMA.

[16]  D. Newby,et al.  Patient selection for high sensitivity cardiac troponin testing and diagnosis of myocardial infarction: prospective cohort study , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[17]  Ò. Miró,et al.  Direct Comparison of 4 Very Early Rule-Out Strategies for Acute Myocardial Infarction Using High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I , 2017, Circulation.

[18]  D. Newby,et al.  Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2017, Circulation.

[19]  Joanna M. Young,et al.  Rapid Rule-out of Acute Myocardial Infarction With a Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Measurement Below the Limit of Detection: A Collaborative Meta-analysis. , 2017, Annals of internal medicine.

[20]  M. Shah,et al.  Estimating the Cost of Care for Emergency Department Syncope Patients: Comparison of Three Models , 2017, The western journal of emergency medicine.

[21]  R. Body,et al.  The Use of Very Low Concentrations of High-sensitivity Troponin T to Rule Out Acute Myocardial Infarction Using a Single Blood Test. , 2016, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[22]  C. Pedroza,et al.  Performance of models for estimating absolute risk difference in multicenter trials with binary outcome , 2016, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[23]  J. Hollander,et al.  State-of-the-Art Evaluation of Emergency Department Patients Presenting With Potential Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2016, Circulation.

[24]  B. Lindahl,et al.  An algorithm for rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using a novel troponin I assay , 2016, Heart.

[25]  W Frank Peacock,et al.  Effectiveness of EDACS Versus ADAPT Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Chest Pain: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Embedded Within Practice. , 2016, Annals of emergency medicine.

[26]  J. Greenslade,et al.  Validation of NICE diagnostic guidance for rule out of myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity troponin tests , 2016, Heart.

[27]  P. Kavsak,et al.  Acceptable Analytical Variation May Exceed High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Cutoffs in Early Rule-Out and Rule-In Acute Myocardial Infarction Algorithms. , 2016, Clinical chemistry.

[28]  J. Greenslade,et al.  Validation of presentation and 3 h high-sensitivity troponin to rule-in and rule-out acute myocardial infarction , 2016, Heart.

[29]  P. Collinson,et al.  High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I at presentation in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study , 2015, The Lancet.

[30]  Scot-Heart Investigators,et al.  CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[31]  P. Collinson,et al.  High sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under-diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: prospective cohort study , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  A. Jaffe,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[33]  M. Dweck,et al.  High-sensitivity troponin I concentrations are a marker of an advanced hypertrophic response and adverse outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis , 2014, European heart journal.

[34]  S. Blankenberg,et al.  Early discharge using single cardiac troponin and copeptin testing in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS): a randomized, controlled clinical process study , 2014, European heart journal.

[35]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2013, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[36]  C. Schindler,et al.  One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. , 2012, Archives of internal medicine.

[37]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation , 2012 .

[38]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Rapid exclusion of acute myocardial infarction in patients with undetectable troponin using a high-sensitivity assay. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[39]  S Capewell,et al.  The health care burden of acute chest pain , 2005, Heart.

[40]  Baris Gencer,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation , 2011 .

[41]  A. Ibrahim,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction. , 2014, Critical care clinics.

[42]  Fred S Apple,et al.  Analytical characteristics of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. , 2012, Clinical chemistry.

[43]  Maarten L. Simoons,et al.  The third universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2013 .