Interdomain path computation: Challenges and Solutions for Label Switched Networks

For label switched networks, such as MPLS and GMPLS, most existing traffic engineering solutions work in a single routing domain. These solutions do not work when a route from the ingress node to the egress node leaves the routing area or autonomous system of the ingress node. In such cases, the path computation problem becomes complicated because of the unavailability of the complete routing information throughout the network. This is because service providers usually choose not to leak routing information beyond the routing area or AS for scalability constraints and confidentiality concerns. This article serves two purposes. First, it provides a description of the existing and ongoing work in interdomain TE within the IETF. This information is currently found in various Internet drafts and has not yet been collectively presented in a single document. To this end, a summary of both existing path computation architectures - PCE-based and per-domain - is provided. Second, it compares two per-domain path computation schemes in terms of the total number of LSPs successfully placed and average number of domains crossed, without assuming availability of complete topology information. We notice that the two per-domain path computation schemes, proposed in [1, 2], have comparable path computation complexities and setup latencies.

[1]  Jean-Philippe Vasseur,et al.  MPLS Inter-Autonomous System (AS) Traffic Engineering (TE) Requirements , 2005, RFC.

[2]  Adrian Farrel,et al.  A Path Computation Element (PCE)-Based Architecture , 2006, RFC.

[3]  Adrian Farrel,et al.  Network Working Group Label Switched Path Stitching with Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering (gmpls Te) , 2008 .

[4]  Vijay Srinivasan,et al.  RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels , 2001, RFC.

[5]  Adrian Farrel,et al.  Network Working Group Encoding of Attributes for Multiprotocol Label Switching (mpls) Label Switched Path (lsp) Establishment Using Resource Reservation Protocol-traffic Engineering (rsvp-te) , 2022 .

[6]  Atsushi Iwata,et al.  Crankback Signaling Extensions for MPLS and GMPLS RSVP-TE , 2007, RFC.

[7]  Jean-Philippe Vasseur,et al.  A Per-Domain Path Computation Method for Establishing Inter-Domain Traffic Engineering (TE) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) , 2008, RFC.

[8]  Adrian Farrel,et al.  Inter-Domain Path Computation using Improved Crankback Signaling in Label Switched Networks , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[9]  Jean-Louis Le Roux,et al.  IS-IS Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery , 2008, RFC.

[10]  Jean-Louis Le Roux,et al.  OSPF Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery , 2008, RFC.

[11]  Kireeti Kompella,et al.  Label Switched Paths (LSP) Hierarchy with Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE) , 2005, RFC.

[12]  Adrian Farrel,et al.  Network Working Group A. Farrel Request for Comments: 4726 Old Dog Consulting Category: Informational a Framework for Inter-domain Multiprotocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering , 2022 .