Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study.

OBJECTIVE To determine both the negative and positive predictive values of comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) results for clinical outcome. DESIGN Data obtained from two prospective, double-blinded, nonselection studies. SETTING Academic center for reproductive medicine. PATIENT(S) One hundred forty-six couples with a mean maternal age of 34.0 ± 4.4 years and a mean paternal age of 37.3 ± 5.8 years. INTERVENTION(S) Embryo biopsy for DNA fingerprinting and aneuploidy assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Failure rate of embryos predicted aneuploid by CCS (negative predictive value) and success rate of embryos predicted euploid by CCS (positive predictive value). RESULT(S) A total of 255 IVF-derived human embryos were cultured and selected for transfer without influence from CCS analysis. Embryos were biopsied before transfer, including 113 blastomeres at the cleavage stage and 142 trophectoderm biopsies at the blastocyst stage. Comprehensive chromosome screening was highly predictive of clinical outcome, with 96% of aneuploid predicted embryos failing to sustain implantation and 41% sustained implantation from embryos predicted to be euploid. CONCLUSION(S) These nonselection data provide the first prospective, blinded, clinical study directly measuring the predictive value of aneuploidy screening for clinical outcome. The clinical error rate of an aneuploidy designation is very low (4%), whereas implantation and delivery rates of euploid embryos are increased relative to the entire cohort of transferred embryos.

[1]  N. Treff,et al.  Cleavage stage embryo biopsy significantly impairs embryonic reproductive potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a novel paired analysis of cotransferred biopsied and non-biopsied sibling embryos , 2011 .

[2]  B. Levy,et al.  SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts , 2010, Molecular human reproduction.

[3]  P. Hunt,et al.  To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[4]  D. Adamson,et al.  Multiple births from assisted reproductive technologies: a challenge that must be met. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[5]  N. Treff,et al.  Tracking embryo implantation using cell-free fetal DNA enriched from maternal circulation at 9 weeks gestation. , 2011, Molecular human reproduction.

[6]  B. Levy,et al.  A novel single-cell DNA fingerprinting method successfully distinguishes sibling human embryos. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  N. Treff,et al.  Single-cell whole-genome amplification technique impacts the accuracy of SNP microarray-based genotyping and copy number analyses , 2010, Molecular human reproduction.

[8]  B. Levy,et al.  Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[9]  N. Treff,et al.  Assessing the reproductive competence of individual embryos: a proposal for the validation of new "-omics" technologies. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[10]  Dk Gardner,et al.  In-vitro culture of human blastocysts , 1999 .