Influence of delayed timing of owners' actions on the behaviors of their dogs, Canis familiaris

Abstract This study examined the influence of delayed actions from the owner, including commands, reinforcement, and punishment, on already-learned behaviors in 10 dogs. The delay times were set to 2.0, 1.0, 0.5, 0.27, and 0.13 seconds (s). Responses to commands with a delay (Delayed) were compared with those that were not delayed (Nondelayed). The results indicated that appropriate responses to commands decreased in 2.0, 1.0, and 0.5 s delayed conditions. As delay time increased, response to commands decreased. The numbers of commands used by handlers to make their dogs obey was significantly increased with a 2.0 and 1.0 second delay compared to the nondelayed trials. The time required for dogs to obey the commands was significantly increased in 2.0, 1.0, and 0.5 s delayed conditions compared to those of the nondelayed trials. There were no significant differences between the 0.27 s, 0.13 s, and the nondelayed condition. These results suggest that timing is an important factor affecting a dog's behavior not only while learning new things, but also in the production of learned desirable behaviors that could occur during everyday interactions.

[1]  Ludwig Huber,et al.  Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.

[2]  W. J. Griffiths,et al.  Free-Operant Acquisition with Delayed Reinforcement , 1992 .

[3]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs , 1998, Animal Cognition.

[4]  K. Lattal,et al.  Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[5]  L. Coppinger,et al.  Observations on assistance dog training and use. , 1998, Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS.

[6]  József Topál,et al.  Dogs' (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. , 2002, Journal of comparative psychology.

[7]  A. Baron,et al.  Density and delay of punishment of free-operant avoidance. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  N A Neef,et al.  Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. , 1994, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  G. Ellison,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL SALIVARY CONDITIONING TO TRACES. , 1964, Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology.

[10]  D. Mills,et al.  More than just a word: non-semantic command variables affect obedience in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) , 2005 .

[11]  Satoshi Yamazaki,et al.  Application of Implicit Learning to Measurement of Psychological Effect of Transmission Delay in Audiovisual Communication , 2002 .

[12]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic Dogs (Canis familiaris) Use Human and Conspecific Social Cues to Locate Hidden Food , 1999 .

[13]  T. Critchfield,et al.  Acquisition of a spatially defined operant with delayed reinforcement. , 1993, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use a physical marker to locate hidden food , 2005, Animal Cognition.

[15]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans’ attentional focus , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[16]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[17]  N. Schneiderman Interstimulus interval function of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit under delay versus trace conditioning. , 1966 .

[18]  T Purryag,et al.  Culture clash. , 1995, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[19]  E. Depiereux,et al.  Training methods of military dog handlers and their effects on the team's performances , 2008 .

[20]  H. Schlinger,et al.  The Effects of Delayed Reinforcement and a Response-Produced Auditory Stimulus on the Acquisition of Operant Behavior in Rats , 1994 .

[21]  N. Rooney,et al.  Do dogs respond to play signals given by humans? , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  N. Braveman,et al.  The combined effects of dosage level and interstimulus interval on the formation of one-trial poison-based aversions in rats , 1975 .

[23]  R. Solomon,et al.  Some effects of delay of punishment on resistance to temptation in dogs. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. , 2003, Journal of comparative psychology.

[25]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Cues to food location that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not use , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[26]  Thomas D. Sambrook,et al.  Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus) , 2000, Animal Cognition.