The Impact of Clickers Instruction on Cognitive Loads and Listening and Speaking Skills in College English Class

Clickers might own a bright future in China if properly introduced although they have not been widely acknowledged as an effective tool to facilitate English learning and teaching in Chinese contexts. By randomly selecting participants from undergraduates in a university in China over four academic years, this study aims to identify the impact of clickers on college English listening and speaking skills, and differences in cognitive loads between clickers and traditional multimedia assisted instruction modes. It was concluded that in China's college English class, compared with multimedia assisted instruction, (1) clickers could improve college English listening skills; (2) clickers could improve college English speaking skills; and (3) clickers could reduce undergraduates' cognitive loads in College English Class. Reasons for the results and defects in this study were also explored and discussed, based on learning, teaching and cognitive load theories. Some Suggestions for future research were also raised.

[1]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[2]  Robert C. Gardner,et al.  Methods and Results in the Study of Anxiety and Language Learning: A Review of the Literature* , 1991 .

[3]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual , 1999 .

[4]  E. Horwitz,et al.  Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety , 1986 .

[5]  Jeff Cain,et al.  A primer on audience response systems: current applications and future considerations. , 2008, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[6]  Lei Bao,et al.  Testing a new voting machine question methodology , 2008 .

[7]  Daniel B. King Using Clickers To Identify the Muddiest Points in Large Chemistry Classes , 2011 .

[8]  Kirsten Crossgrove,et al.  Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[9]  J. Sweller Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[10]  William B Wood,et al.  Teaching more by lecturing less. , 2005, Cell biology education.

[11]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[12]  Ian D. Beatty,et al.  Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching , 2005, physics/0508114.

[13]  Margaret I. Brown,et al.  Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[14]  J. Sweller COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[15]  Beth Simon,et al.  Peer instruction: do students really learn from peer discussion in computing? , 2011, ICER.

[16]  Michèle Shuster,et al.  Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[17]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[18]  J. Collins,et al.  Audience response systems: technology to engage learners. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[19]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Elements of a Science of E-Learning , 2003 .

[20]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[21]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[22]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning , 2012 .

[23]  Jennifer Kadlowec,et al.  Classes That Click: Fast, Rich Feedback to Enhance Student Learning and Satisfaction , 2010 .

[24]  R. Carey,et al.  Understanding instructions. , 1992, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[25]  Linda J Collins Livening Up the Classroom , 2007, Medical reference services quarterly.

[26]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[27]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  An examination of two mental workload measurement approaches to understanding multimedia learning , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions , 2009, Science.

[29]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  The Benefits of Using Clickers in Small-Enrollment Seminar-Style Biology Courses , 2011, CBE life sciences education.

[30]  J. Merriënboer,et al.  Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning , 2005 .