Highway Investment and Regional Economic Development: Decision Methods and Empirical Foundations

Federal and state highway programmes have been established to stimulate economic development in lagging US regions. In many instances, highway route location was influenced by regional development theory. Regional development theory argues that regional policy effectiveness depends upon the existence of certain socio-economic, spatial, resource and institutional 'triggering forces'. This paper reviews criteria used in US development highway corridor selection and variables identified by various regional development theories. A synthesis of highway empirical research suggests that geographical region, urbanisation, development and public infrastructure may be important 'triggering forces' in the US. However, further rigorous empirical research is needed in order to assess the various regional development theories and highway planning practice.

[1]  J. Dodgson,et al.  EXTERNAL EFFECTS AND SECONDARY BENEFITS IN ROAD INVESTMENT APPRAISAL , 1973 .

[2]  N. H. Lithwick.  Regional Economic Policy: The Canadian Experience , 1979 .

[3]  Marion R Poole,et al.  BENEFITS MATRIX MODEL FOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECT EVALUATION , 1983 .

[4]  W G Waters.  TRANSPORTATION AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE PERSISTENT MYTH , 1979 .

[5]  R. Ellson,et al.  PUBLIC CAPITAL, REGIONAL OUTPUT, AND DEVELOPMENT: SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE , 1987 .

[6]  Benjamin Chinitz.  The Regional Problem in the U.S.A. , 1969 .

[7]  Randall W. Eberts,et al.  Estimating the contribution of urban public infrastructure to regional growth , 1986 .

[8]  Leo H. Klaassen,et al.  A. Growth poles in economic theory and policy , 1972 .

[9]  A J Siccardi.  ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF TRANSIT AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION , 1986 .

[10]  D. Tong,et al.  Regional Development , 2019, Dictionary of Geotourism.

[11]  E. A. G. Robinson.  Backward Areas in Advanced Countries , 1969 .

[12]  F. Snickars.  EFFECTS OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROVISION ON URBAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT , 1989 .

[13]  G. A. McBride.  Policy matters in investment decision-making , 1970 .

[14]  Alicia Haydock Munnell,et al.  How Does Public Infrastructure Affect Regional Economic Performance , 1990 .

[15]  Randolph C. Martin.  FEDERAL REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS AND U.S. PROBLEM AREAS , 1979 .

[16]  David J. Forkenbrock,et al.  Road Investment to Foster Local Economic Development , 1990 .

[17]  Robert E. Looney,et al.  The regional impact of infrastructure investment in Mexico , 1981 .

[18]  R. Briggs,et al.  THE IMPACT OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM ON NON METROPOLITAN GROWTH , 1980 .

[19]  Carl W. Hale,et al.  Appalachian Regional Development and the Distribution of Highway Benefits. , 1974 .

[20]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Infrastructure and regional development: A multidimensional policy analysis , 1986 .

[21]  John M. Clapp,et al.  Effects of Federal Economic Development Programs , 1986 .

[22]  Kevin Allan,et al.  Regional Problems and Policies in Italy and France , 1971 .

[23]  Mahlon R. Straszheim.  Researching the Role of Transportation in Regional Development , 1972 .

[24]  K. M. Gwilliam,et al.  The indirect effects of highway investment , 1970 .

[25]  F. Thomas Ayers,et al.  Alternative Transportation Expenditures in Development Strategy: Arterial Highways Versus Local Roads , 1976 .

[26]  Melvin G. Blase,et al.  A Depressed Region and Three Myths , 1971 .

[27]  John M. Munro.  PLANNING THE APPALACHIAN DEVELOPMENT HIGHWAY SYSTEM: SOME CRITICAL QUESTIONS , 1969 .

[28]  Dieter Biehl,et al.  Determinants of Regional Disparities and the Role of Public Finance , 1980 .

[29]  Daniel T. Lichter,et al.  Demographic Response to Transportation Innovation: The Case of the Interstate Highway , 1980 .

[30]  Kevin T. Deno.  The Effect of Public Capital on U. S. Manufacturing Activity: 1970 to 1978 , 1988 .

[31]  Michael Chernoff.  DENSITY AS A DETERMINANT OF HIGHWAY IMPACTS , 1978 .

[32]  Leonard F Wheat.  THE EFFECT OF MODERN HIGHWAYS ON URBAN MANUFACTURING GROWTH , 1969 .