Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments.

This study investigated age-related differences in sensitivity to temporal cues in modified natural speech sounds. Listeners included young noise-masked subjects, elderly normal-hearing subjects, and elderly hearing-impaired subjects. Four speech continua were presented to listeners, with stimuli from each continuum varying in a single temporal dimension. The acoustic cues varied in separate continua were voice-onset time, vowel duration, silence duration, and transition duration. In separate conditions, the listeners identified the word stimuli, discriminated two stimuli in a same-different paradigm, and discriminated two stimuli in a 3-interval, 2-alternative forced-choice procedure. Results showed age-related differences in the identification function crossover points for the continua that varied in silence duration and transition duration. All listeners demonstrated shorter difference limens (DLs) for the three-interval paradigm than the two-interval paradigm, with older hearing-impaired listeners showing larger DLs than the other listener groups for the silence duration cue. The findings support the general hypothesis that aging can influence the processing of specific temporal cues that are related to consonant manner distinctions.

[1]  P. Denes.  Effect of Duration on the Perception of Voicing , 1955 .

[2]  A. Liberman,et al.  Tempo of frequency change as a cue for distinguishing classes of speech sounds. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English , 1960 .

[4]  A. Small,et al.  Temporal differential sensitivity for auditory stimuli. , 1962, American Journal of Psychology.

[5]  L. Lisker,et al.  A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .

[6]  R. Plomp.  Rate of Decay of Auditory Sensation , 1964 .

[7]  L. Lisker,et al.  Some Effects of Context On Voice Onset Time in English Stops , 1967, Language and speech.

[8]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  S M Abel,et al.  Duration discrimination of noise and tone bursts. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  E D Schubert,et al.  Consonant phonemic errors associated with pure-tone configurations and certain kinds of hearing impairment. , 1972, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  L. Raphael.  Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Categorical and noncategorical modes of speech perception along the voicing continuum. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  D. Klatt.  Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. , 1975, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  E. Pfeiffer.  A Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire for the Assessment of Organic Brain Deficit in Elderly Patients † , 1975, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[15]  Randy L. Diehl,et al.  Feature analyzers for the phonetic dimensionstop vs. continuant , 1976 .

[16]  R R Munro,et al.  In Search of the Acoustic Correlates of Stress: Fundamental Frequency, Amplitude, and Duration in the Connected Utterance of Some Native and Non-Native Speakers of English , 1978, Phonetica.

[17]  A. Liberman,et al.  Some experiments on the sound of silence in phonetic perception. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Robert C. Bilger,et al.  Standardization of a Test of Speech Perception in Noise , 1984 .

[19]  H J Simon,et al.  Perception of temporal differences in speech by "normal-hearing" adults: effects of age and intensity. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  W. M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Speed of processing in normal aging: effects of speech rate, linguistic structure, and processing time. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[22]  P. Luce,et al.  Contextual effects on vowel duration, closure duration, and the consonant/vowel ratio in speech production. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  M F Dorman,et al.  Phonetic identification by elderly normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  J E Flege,et al.  Imitation of a VOT continuum by native speakers of English and Spanish: evidence for phonetic category formation. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  S. Gelfand,et al.  Acoustic reflex thresholds in normal and cochlear-impaired ears: effects of no-response rates on 90th percentiles in a large sample. , 1990, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[26]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[27]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Age effects on measures of auditory duration discrimination. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[28]  B A Schneider,et al.  Gap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Age effects on duration discrimination with simple and complex stimuli. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  J E Flege,et al.  The perception of English and Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: a multidimensional scaling analysis. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[32]  K. Snell,et al.  Age-related changes in temporal gap detection. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  T Letowski,et al.  Effects of age, speech rate, and type of test on temporal auditory processing. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[34]  Sentence duration as an index of overall proficiency in an L2 , 1997 .

[35]  D. Grantham,et al.  Temporal processing in the aging auditory system. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Auditory temporal order perception in younger and older adults. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[37]  K. Snell,et al.  The effect of temporal placement on gap detectability. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  A R Horwitz,et al.  Psychometric functions for gap detection in noise measured from young and aged subjects. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  I. R. MacKay,et al.  Persistent errors in the perception and production of word‐initial English stop consonants by native speakers of Italian , 2000 .

[40]  Joan Besing,et al.  Effects of age and frequency disparity on gap discrimination. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  Harold T. Edwards,et al.  Age and Understanding Speakers with Spanish or Taiwanese Accents , 2003, Perceptual and motor skills.

[42]  Jennifer J. Lister,et al.  Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.