Functional assessments for decision-making regarding return to sports following ACL reconstruction. Part I: development of a new test battery

AbstractPurposeReturn to activity remains the most common concern following an injury. To facilitate the decision regarding a patient’s return to sport, we developed a standardized and easy-to-use test battery to enable an objective evaluation of knee function.MethodsThe test battery consisted of seven functional tests: the two-leg stability test, one-leg stability test (OL-ST), two-leg countermovement jump (CMJ), one-leg CMJ (OL-CMJ), plyometric jumps, speedy test and quick feet test. For each test, the reliability was determined based on the intraclass correlation coefficient. For all one-leg tests, the limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated. ResultsAll tests showed a moderate-to-high reliability. Normative data from 434 participants were included in the analysis. The subjects were categorized according to age as follows: children (10–14 years), youth (15–19 years), young adults (20–29 years) and adults (30–50 years). The establishment of the functional test values allowed the classification into five normative categories. The LSI for the OL-ST (98 %) indicated a better performance of the non-dominant leg. In contrast, high LSI values were found for the OL-CMJ (124 %), indicating a better performance of the dominant leg.ConclusionEach test was found to be reliable and simple to perform. The better performance of the non-dominant leg in stability tasks must be considered when interpreting side-to-side differences. The established norm data from healthy individuals of each test battery represents an important basis for a clinical setting. Test results from an ACL-reconstructed patient should be at least classified as a functionally average outcome to support a safe return to sports.Level of evidenceIV.

[1]  Gregory D. Myer,et al.  Prevention of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer players. Part 2: A review of prevention programs aimed to modify risk factors and to reduce injury rates , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[2]  Marcie Harris-Hayes,et al.  Variables associated with return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[3]  S. Demura,et al.  Specific Factors That Influence Deciding the Takeoff Leg during Jumping Movements , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[4]  N. Dalén,et al.  Validity and responsiveness of the test of athletes with knee injuries: the new criterion based functional performance test instrument , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[5]  F. Noyes,et al.  Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2011, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[6]  R. Thomeé,et al.  Return to sport , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[7]  L. Engebretsen,et al.  Clinical, Functional, and Radiologic Outcome in Team Handball Players 6 to 11 Years after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  F R Noyes,et al.  Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  T. Hewett,et al.  Biomechanical Measures of Neuromuscular Control and Valgus Loading of the Knee Predict Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk in Female Athletes: A Prospective Study , 2005, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  J. Nyhof-Young,et al.  A Qualitative Investigation of the Decision to Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2014, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  B. Mandelbaum,et al.  Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injury in the female athlete , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[12]  Kevin R Ford,et al.  Utilization of modified NFL combine testing to identify functional deficits in athletes following ACL reconstruction. , 2011, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[13]  Jesper Augustsson,et al.  Ability of a new hop test to determine functional deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2004, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[14]  U. Dalgas,et al.  Muscle strength and functional performance is markedly impaired at the recommended time point for sport return after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in recreational athletes. , 2015, Human movement science.

[15]  E. Roos,et al.  Muscle strength and functional performance in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury treated with training and surgical reconstruction or training only: a two to five-year followup. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  N. Dalén,et al.  Reliability of a criterion-based test of athletes with knee injuries; where the physiotherapist and the patient independently and simultaneously assess the patient’s performance , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[17]  Megan Donaldson,et al.  The clinical utility of functional performance tests within one-year post-acl reconstruction: a systematic review. , 2011, International journal of sports physical therapy.

[18]  E. Witvrouw,et al.  Return to Sport after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Literature Review , 2014 .

[19]  Jesper Augustsson,et al.  A test battery for evaluating hop performance in patients with an ACL injury and patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[20]  Jesper Augustsson,et al.  Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[21]  Kristian Samuelsson,et al.  Prevention of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in sports. Part II: systematic review of the effectiveness of prevention programmes in male athletes , 2013, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[22]  F R Noyes,et al.  Rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction: function testing. , 1992, Orthopedics.

[23]  K. Kimura,et al.  On the Morphological and Functional Laterality in Human Extremities, Especially in the Lower Limb. , 1974 .

[24]  S. Coren,et al.  A behaviorally validated self-report inventory to assess four types of lateral preference , 1979 .

[25]  Brian J. Cole,et al.  Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2014, Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.

[26]  M. Paterno,et al.  The test-retest reliability of a one legged hop for distance in young adults with and without ACL reconstruction , 1996 .

[27]  D. Hopper,et al.  Test–retest reliability of knee rating scales and functional hop tests one year following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2002 .

[28]  Kate E Webster,et al.  Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play , 2011, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[29]  P. Stratford,et al.  Hop Testing Provides a Reliable and Valid Outcome Measure During Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[30]  Lynn Snyder-Mackler,et al.  Time line for noncopers to pass return-to-sports criteria after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2010, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.