. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii 1. Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 Challenges Attracting and Retaining Girls STEM . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Challenges Attracting and Retaining Underrepresented Ethnic Groups in STEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.3 Diversification of STEM Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.4 Introduction to 3Helix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.5 Inception of Social GIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2. Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1 Students as Active Agents of Social Justice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.1 Awareness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.2 Skills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.3 Ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2 Software Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2.1 Low Barrier to Entry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2.2 Import a Variety of Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.2.3 Tagging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.2.4 Open-Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3. Social GIS Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.1 Trial and Error . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.2 Software Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.2.1 Client–Server Separation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.2.2 Designing and Developing a Flexible Database . . . . . . . . . 11 3.2.2.1 Dataset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.2.2.2 MapElement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.2.2.3 Tag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 3.2.2.4 TagIndiv . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
[1]
J. Blickenstaff.
Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter?
,
2005
.
[2]
Sr. Clarence L. Terry,et al.
Mathematical Counterstory and African American Male Students: Urban Mathematics Education from a Critical Race Theory Perspective
,
2011
.
[3]
Victor Lavy,et al.
On the Origins of Gender Human Capital Gaps: Short and Long Term Consequences of Teachers’ Stereotypical Biases
,
2015
.
[4]
Susan Staffin Metz,et al.
Attracting the Engineers of 2020 Today
,
2007
.
[5]
O. Malanchuk,et al.
Who's computing? Gender and race differences in young adults' decisions to pursue an information technology career.
,
2005,
New directions for child and adolescent development.
[6]
Erica S. Weisgram,et al.
Girls and science careers: The role of altruistic values and attitudes about scientific tasks
,
2006
.
[7]
E. Gutstein.
Teaching and Learning Mathematics for Social Justice in an Urban, Latino School
,
2003
.
[8]
Preferences of Male and Female Students for TSA Competitive Events
,
2010
.
[9]
Audrey Bennett,et al.
Teaching with Hidden Capital: Agency in Children's Computational Explorations of Cornrow Hairstyles
,
2023,
Children, Youth and Environments.