Three‐dimensional imaging and image analysis of hippocampal neurons: Confocal and digitally enhanced wide field microscopy

The microscopy of biological specimens has traditionally been a two‐dimensional imaging method for analyzing what are in reality three‐dimensional (3‐D) objects. This has been a major limitation of the application of one of science's most widely used tools. Nowhere has this limitation been more acute than in neurobiology, which is dominated by the necessity of understanding both large‐and small‐scale 3‐D anatomy. Fortunately, recent advances in optical instrumentation and computational methods have provided the means for retrieving the third dimension, making full 3‐D microscopic imaging possible. Optical designs have concentrated on the confocal imaging mode while computational methods have made 3‐D imaging possible with wide field microscopes using deconvolution methods. This work presents a brief review of these methods, especially as applied to neurobiology, and data using both approaches. Specimens several hundred micrometers thick can be sampled allowing essentially intact neurons to be imaged. These neurons Image analysis in 3‐D is as important as visualization in 3‐D. Automated methods of cell counting and analysis by nuclear detection as well as tracing of individual neurons are presented. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Karen L. Smith,et al.  Confocal microscopy and three-dimensional reconstruction of electrophysiologically identified neurons in thick brain slices. , 1991, Journal of electron microscopy technique.

[2]  Joseph J. Capowski,et al.  Computer Techniques in Neuroanatomy , 1989, Springer US.

[3]  S. Gibson,et al.  Experimental test of an analytical model of aberration in an oil-immersion objective lens used in three-dimensional light microscopy. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  J N Turner,et al.  Automated three-dimensional image analysis of thick and overlapped clusters in cytologic preparations. Application to cytologic smears. , 1993, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[5]  A. Boyde Stereoscopic images in confocal (tandem scanning) microscopy. , 1985, Science.

[6]  W. W. Stewart,et al.  Functional connections between cells as revealed by dye-coupling with a highly fluorescent naphthalimide tracer , 1978, Cell.

[7]  Karen L. Smith,et al.  Ultrastructural investigation of neurons identified and localized using the confocal scanning laser microscope. , 1991, Journal of electron microscopy technique.

[8]  Edmund M. Glaser,et al.  Analysis of thick brain sections by obverse—Reverse computer microscopy: Application of a new, high clarity Golgi—Nissl stain , 1981, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  J. Kellerth,et al.  Electrophysiological and morphological measurements in cat gastrocnemius and soleus α-motoneurones , 1984, Brain Research.

[10]  Yi-Hwa Liu,et al.  Blind deconvolution of 2-D and 3-D fluorescent micrographs , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Andrew R. Cohen,et al.  Automated tracing and volume measurements of neurons from 3‐D confocal fluorescence microscopy data , 1994, Journal of microscopy.

[12]  W. W. Stewart Lucifer dyes—highly fluorescent dyes for biological tracing , 1981, Nature.

[13]  R. Burke,et al.  Membrane area and dendritic structure in type‐identified triceps surae alpha motoneurons , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  J. Turner,et al.  Algorithms for automated characterization of cell populations in thick specimens from 3‐D confocal fluorescence microscopy data , 1994, Journal of microscopy.

[15]  P. Schwartzkroin,et al.  Characteristics of CA1 neurons recorded intracellularly in the hippocampalin vitro slice preparation , 1975, Brain Research.

[16]  D. Agard,et al.  Determination of three-dimensional imaging properties of a light microscope system. Partial confocal behavior in epifluorescence microscopy. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[17]  G. J. Brakenhoff,et al.  Refractive index and axial distance measurements in 3-D microscopy , 1992 .

[18]  J. Clements,et al.  Cable properties of cat spinal motoneurones measured by combining voltage clamp, current clamp and intracellular staining. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  C. Barillot,et al.  Interactive 3-D Image Display And Analysis , 1988, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[20]  J. Vassy,et al.  High-resolution three-dimensional images from confocal scanning laser microscopy. Quantitative study and mathematical correction of the effects from bleaching and fluorescence attenuation in depth. , 1991, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[21]  Karen L. Smith,et al.  Parameters affecting imaging of the horseradish‐peroxidase‐diaminobenzidine reaction product in the confocal scanning laser microscope , 1990, Journal of microscopy.

[22]  D. Rawlins,et al.  Three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy. , 1991, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[23]  D. Agard,et al.  Fluorescence microscopy in three dimensions. , 1989, Methods in cell biology.

[24]  K. Horikawa,et al.  A versatile means of intracellular labeling: injection of biocytin and its detection with avidin conjugates , 1988, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  Badrinath Roysam,et al.  Unsupervised noise removal algorithms for three-dimensional confocal fluorescence microscopy , 1992 .

[26]  W. A. Carrington Image restoration in 3-D microscopy with limited data , 1990, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[27]  D. M. Shotton,et al.  Confocal scanning optical microscopy and its applications for biological specimens , 1989 .

[28]  Karen L. Smith,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Imaging of Neurophysiologically Characterized Hippocampal Neurons by Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy a , 1991, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[29]  James N. Turner,et al.  Optimized reflection imaging in laser confocal microscopy and its application to neurobiology: Modificationsa to the biorad MRC‐500 , 1992 .

[30]  J. Swann,et al.  Penicillin-induced epileptogenesis in immature rat CA3 hippocampal pyramidal cells. , 1984, Brain research.

[31]  James N. Turner,et al.  Confocal scanning laser microscope images of hippocampal neurons intracellularly labeled with biocytin , 1990, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[33]  S. Cullheim,et al.  A quantitative light microscopic study of the dendrites of cat spinal γ‐motoneurons after intracellular staining with horseradish peroxidase , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  A Liljeborg,et al.  A confocal laser microscope scanner for digital recording of optical serial sections , 1989, Journal of Microscopy.

[35]  P D Coleman,et al.  Automated three-dimensional dendrite tracking system. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  Karen L. Smith,et al.  Three-dimensional confocal light microscopy of neurons: fluorescent and reflection stains. , 1993, Methods in cell biology.

[37]  A. M. Downs,et al.  Three-dimensional DNA image cytometry by confocal scanning laser microscopy in thick tissue blocks. , 1991, Cytometry.

[38]  A Boyde,et al.  Study of Golgi‐impregnated material using the confocal tandem scanning reflected light microscope , 1990, Journal of microscopy.

[39]  C. Sheppard,et al.  Theory and practice of scanning optical microscopy , 1984 .

[40]  R A Robb,et al.  Interactive display and analysis of 3-D medical images. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[41]  D. Rawlins,et al.  The point‐spread function of a confocal microscope: its measurement and use in deconvolution of 3‐D data , 1991 .