Direct field measurement of wind drag on vegetation for application to windbreak design and modelling

A field instrument was designed and field tested for measuring the applied wind load on trees and surface-mounted obstacles in a natural boundary layer. Using this instrument, the effect of vegetation porosity on the drag coefficient of small conifer trees (h=1·4 m) was determined directly in the field. Drag coefficients for two simple solid geometric forms (cone and cylinder) having approximately the same size (height and diameter) as the conifer trees were also measured over a relatively wide range of Reynolds numbers and the results compared to published drag curves for these shapes. The field study found that the porous element had a higher drag coefficient than a solid element, both for the solid element tested and for the drag coefficient suggested for surface-mounted solid obstacles. The drag coefficient changed on a continuum with porosity, rising initially from the value measured for the element as a solid, reaching a peak at an intermediate value and eventually falling to zero when the element was removed. This peak in the drag coefficient versus porosity curve corresponds to reports that shelterbelt efficiency peaks at medium-porosities, and is an important relationship in terms of modelling momentum extraction of vegetation, one which has not been shown previously in the literature. Findings of this study have direct application to the modelling of shelterbelts and windbreaks and the assessment of the amount of vegetation cover required to suppress wind erosion in rangeland vegetation communities. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  C. Neuman,et al.  Development of deflation lag surfaces , 1995 .

[2]  B. Lee,et al.  An Investigation of the Forces on Three Dimensional Bluff Bodies in Rough Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers , 1977 .

[3]  G. J. Mayhead,et al.  Some drag coefficients for British forest trees derived from wind tunnel studies , 1973 .

[4]  L. J. Hagen,et al.  Turbulent Velocity Fluctuations and Vertical Flow as Affected by Windbreak Porosity , 1971 .

[5]  R. H. Grant.  The influence of the physical attributes of a spruce shoot on momentum transfer , 1985 .

[6]  Albert D. Hyers,et al.  Land use and desert dust hazards in central Arizona , 1981 .

[7]  D. Gillette,et al.  Field measurement of the sheltering effect of vegetation on erodible land surfaces , 1990 .

[8]  E. Takle,et al.  A numerical simulation of boundary-layer flows near shelterbelts , 1995 .

[9]  D. Gillette,et al.  The effect of nonerodible particles on wind erosion of erodible surfaces , 1989 .

[10]  W. P. Wang,et al.  Roughness element effect on local and universal saltation transport , 1991 .

[11]  J. Landsberg,et al.  Surface exchange characteristics of leaves subject to mutual interference , 1973 .

[12]  Ram Sagi,et al.  Drag on a windbreak in two-dimensional flow , 1971 .

[13]  Henry M. Morris,et al.  Flow in Rough Conduits , 1955 .

[14]  Ido Seginer,et al.  Windbreak drag calculated from the horizontal velocity field , 1972 .

[15]  Leon Lyles,et al.  Engineering Similitude and Momentum Transfer Principles Applied to Shelterbelt Studies , 1963 .

[16]  William G. Nickling,et al.  SHEAR STRESS PARTITIONING IN SPARSELY VEGETATED DESERT CANOPIES , 1996 .

[17]  M. Raupach,et al.  The effect of roughness elements on wind erosion threshold , 1993 .

[18]  H. Musick,et al.  Field evaluation of relationships between a vegetation structural parameter and sheltering against wind erosion , 1990 .

[19]  D. Brand.  Estimating the surface area of spruce and pine foliage from displaced volume and length , 1987 .

[20]  S. Vogel.  Drag and Reconfiguration of Broad Leaves in High Winds , 1989 .

[21]  M. Raupach.  Drag and drag partition on rough surfaces , 1992 .

[22]  E. Takle,et al.  On three-dimensionality of shelterbelt structure and its influences on shelter effects , 1996 .

[23]  J. K Marshall,et al.  Drag measurements in roughness arrays of varying density and distribution , 1971 .

[24]  P. Taylor.  Turbulent Wakes in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 1988 .

[25]  John D. Wilson,et al.  On the choice of a windbreak porosity profile , 1987 .