Picture archiving and communication systems and vascular surgery: Clinical impressions and suggestions for improvement

The purpose of this study was to determine the acceptance and clinical utility of a large scale picture archiving and communication system (PACS) for vascular surgery. Questionnaires and one-on-one interviews were conducted with physicians and nurses in the department of vascular surgery at the Baltimore VA Medical Center where PACS has been in routine, hospital-wide use for more than 21/2 years. The perceptions of the clinical staff were assessed to determine the efficacy of PACS in comparison to the conventional film based alternative for the practice of vascular surgery and suggestions for improvements were solicited. There was consensus among the vascular surgery staff members that the use of PACS enhanced their clinical practices, both in and out of the operating room (OR). Vascular surgeons heavily rely on image display in the OR as a “road map” to help determine their operative approach and to guide their surgery. PACS offers unique intraoperative imaging capabilities including rapid image retrieval and improved archival, cine review, the ability to modify image contrast, and the ability to obtain direct quantitative measurements of the degree of vascular stenosis. The increased accessibility and availability of images throughout the hospital enables improvements in time management and in patient care.

[1]  J E Gray,et al.  Total digital radiology: is it feasible? Or desirable? , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  Siegel El Hospital takes plunge into full-fledged PACS. , 1993 .

[3]  D. R. Haynor,et al.  Modeling The Economics Of PACS: What Is Important? , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[4]  K S Berbaum,et al.  Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of PACS. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  S C Horii,et al.  Electronic imaging workstations: ergonomic issues and the user interface. , 1992, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  Z. Protopapas,et al.  Impact of filmless radiology on frequency of clinician consultations with radiologists. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Eliot L. Siegel,et al.  Making filmless radiology work , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[8]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  Experience with Image Management Networks at Three Universities: Is the Cup Half-Empty or Half-Full? , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[9]  Eliot L. Siegel,et al.  PACS in the operating room: experience at the Baltimore VA Medical Center , 1995, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Image Management and Communication (IMAC 95).

[10]  D Gur,et al.  The hidden costs of delayed access to diagnostic imaging information: impact on PACS implementation. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.