What do newspapers , watches , credit cards , and liquors bottles have in common ? A computational exploration of question behavior

What makes a question useful? What makes an answer appropriate? In this paper, we show that a recently proposed probabilistic model of question-answer behavior provides a unifying account of four separate effects from the psycholinguistics and pragmatics literature. For three of these effects, we formulate a pragmatic answerer who is informative with respect to the questioner’s underlying goals (or QUD), which are inferred given the context. These simple applications illustrate the role of the QUD in guiding answerer inference. In the final effect we model, the questioner’s QUD affects the question they choose to ask; thus, our pragmatic answerer may use the question utterance itself as a signal to help infer the questioner’s goals.

[1]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[2]  Steven E. Boër,et al.  Knowing Who , 1985 .

[3]  H. H. Clark Responding to indirect speech acts , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  On the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers , 1984 .

[5]  Jonathan Ginzburg,et al.  Resolving questions, I , 1995 .

[6]  Craige Roberts Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated for-mal theory of pragmatics , 1996 .

[7]  Jean-Baptiste Van der Henst,et al.  Truthfulness and Relevance in Telling The Time , 2002 .

[8]  R. Rooij Questioning to resolve decision problems , 2003 .

[9]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  P. Todd,et al.  Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study , 2005 .

[11]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Striving for optimal relevance when answering questions , 2008, Cognition.

[12]  N. Arnett Goal-driven Answers in the Cards Dialogue Corpus , 2012 .

[13]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Predicting Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Games , 2012, Science.

[14]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Knowledge and implicature: Modeling language understanding as social cognition , 2012, CogSci.

[15]  Christopher Potts,et al.  Emergence of Gricean Maxims from Multi-Agent Decision Theory , 2013, NAACL.

[16]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Nonliteral understanding of number words , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.