The delivery of BCNU to brain tumors.

This paper reports the development of three-dimensional simulations to study the effect of various factors on the delivery of 1-3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) to brain tumors. The study yields information on the efficacy of various delivery methods, and the optimal location of polymer implantation. Two types of drug deliveries, namely, systemic administration and controlled release from polymers, were simulated using fluid dynamics analysis package (FIDAP) to predict the temporal and spatial variation of drug distribution. Polymer-based delivery provides higher mean concentration, longer BCNU exposure time and reduced systemic toxicity than bolus injection. Polymer implanted in the core gives higher concentration of drug in both the core and viable zone than the polymer in the viable zone case. The penetration depth of BCNU is very short. This is because BCNU can get drained out of the system before diffusing to any appreciable distance. Since transvascular permeation is the dominant means of BCNU delivery, the interstitial convection has minor effect because of the extremely small transvascular Peclet number. The reaction of BCNU with brain tissues reduces the drug concentration in all regions and its effect increases with rate constant. The implantation of BCNU/ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVAc) matrix at the lumen of the viable zone immediately following the surgical removal of 80% of the tumor may be an effective treatment for the chemotherapy of brain tumors. The present study provides a quantitative examination on the working principle of Gliadel wafer for the treatment of brain tumors.

[1]  M. Kaviany Principles of heat transfer in porous media , 1991 .

[2]  R K Jain,et al.  Mechanisms of heterogeneous distribution of monoclonal antibodies and other macromolecules in tumors: significance of elevated interstitial pressure. , 1988, Cancer research.

[3]  R. Tamargo,et al.  Brain biocompatibility of a biodegradable, controlled-release polymer in rats. , 1989, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  Jian Li,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of IgG delivery to tumors , 1998 .

[5]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  Placebo-controlled trial of safety and efficacy of intraoperative controlled delivery by biodegradable polymers of chemotherapy for recurrent gliomas , 1995, The Lancet.

[6]  K. Fujimori,et al.  Modeling analysis of the global and microscopic distribution of immunoglobulin G, F(ab')2, and Fab in tumors. , 1989, Cancer research.

[7]  V D Calhoun,et al.  A finite element model for predicting the distribution of drugs delivered intracranially to the brain. , 1997, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[8]  R. Tamargo,et al.  Controlled delivery of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea from ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer. , 1989, Cancer research.

[9]  W. Saltzman,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of interstitial delivery of carmustine, 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel from a biodegradable polymer implant in the monkey brain. , 1998, Cancer research.

[10]  V. Levin,et al.  The effect of phenobarbital pretreatment on the antitumor activity of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU), 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU) and 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-(2,6-dioxo-3-piperidyl-1-nitrosourea (PCNU), and on the plasma pharmacokinetics and biotransformation of BCNU , 1979, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[11]  W. Mark Saltzman,et al.  Drugs released from polymers: diffusion and elimination in brain tissue , 1991 .

[12]  R. Tamargo,et al.  The intracerebral distribution of BCNU delivered by surgically implanted biodegradable polymers. , 1992, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  J. Pappenheimer,et al.  Filtration, diffusion and molecular sieving through peripheral capillary membranes; a contribution to the pore theory of capillary permeability. , 1951, The American journal of physiology.

[14]  E. Gillette,et al.  Morphometric analyses of the microvasculature of tumors during growth and after x‐irradiation , 1974, Cancer.

[15]  R. Jain,et al.  Microvascular permeability of normal and neoplastic tissues. , 1986, Microvascular research.

[16]  H. Reulen,et al.  Formation and resolution of human peritumoral brain edema. , 1994, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum.

[17]  C. Patlak,et al.  Intrathecal chemotherapy: brain tissue profiles after ventriculocisternal perfusion. , 1975, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[18]  W. Stigelman,et al.  Goodman and Gilman's the Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics , 1986 .

[19]  R K Jain,et al.  Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors. II. Role of heterogeneous perfusion and lymphatics. , 1990, Microvascular research.

[20]  R. Tamargo,et al.  Interstitial chemotherapy of the 9L gliosarcoma: controlled release polymers for drug delivery in the brain. , 1993, Cancer research.

[21]  R Langer,et al.  Bioerodible polyanhydrides as drug-carrier matrices. II. Biocompatibility and chemical reactivity. , 1986, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[22]  S Saito,et al.  Increased tumor tissue pressure in association with the growth of rat tumors. , 1986, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.

[23]  R Langer,et al.  Bioerodible polyanhydrides as drug-carrier matrices. I: Characterization, degradation, and release characteristics. , 1985, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[24]  R K Jain,et al.  Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors. I. Role of interstitial pressure and convection. , 1989, Microvascular research.