AdQSM: A New Method for Estimating Above-Ground Biomass from TLS Point Clouds

Forest above-ground biomass (AGB) can be estimated based on light detection and ranging (LiDAR) point clouds. This paper introduces an accurate and detailed quantitative structure model (AdQSM), which can estimate the AGB of large tropical trees. AdQSM is based on the reconstruction of 3D tree models from terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) point clouds. It represents a tree as a set of closed and complete convex polyhedra. We use AdQSM to model 29 trees of various species (total 18 species) scanned by TLS from three study sites (the dense tropical forests of Peru, Indonesia, and Guyana). The destructively sampled tree geometry measurement data is used as reference values to evaluate the accuracy of diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height, tree volume, branch volume, and AGB estimated from AdQSM. After AdQSM reconstructs the structure and volume of each tree, AGB is derived by combining the wood density of the specific tree species from destructive sampling. The AGB estimation from AdQSM and the post-harvest reference measurement data show a satisfying agreement. The coefficient of variation of root mean square error (CV-RMSE) and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) are 20.37% and 0.97, respectively. AdQSM provides accurate tree volume estimation, regardless of the characteristics of the tree structure, without major systematic deviations. We compared the accuracy of AdQSM and TreeQSM in modeling the volume of 29 trees. The tree volume from AdQSM is compared with the reference value, and the determination coefficient (R2), relative bias (rBias), and CV-RMSE of tree volume are 0.96, 6.98%, and 22.62%, respectively. The tree volume from TreeQSM is compared with the reference value, and the R2, relative Bias (rBias), and CV-RMSE of tree volume are 0.94, −9.69%, and 23.20%, respectively. The CCCs between the volume estimates based on AdQSM, TreeQSM, and the reference values are 0.97 and 0.96. AdQSM also models the branches in detail. The volume of branches from AdQSM is compared with the destructive measurement reference data. The R2, rBias, and CV-RMSE of the branches volume are 0.97, 12.38%, and 36.86%, respectively. The DBH and height of the harvested trees were used as reference values to test the accuracy of AdQSM’s estimation of DBH and tree height. The R2, rBias, and CV-RMSE of DBH are 0.94, −5.01%, and 9.06%, respectively. The R2, rBias, and CV-RMSE of the tree height were 0.95, 1.88%, and 5.79%, respectively. This paper provides not only a new QSM method for estimating AGB based on TLS point clouds but also the potential for further development and testing of allometric equations.

[1]  R. Valentini,et al.  Uncertainty of remotely sensed aboveground biomass over an African tropical forest: Propagating errors from trees to plots to pixels , 2015 .

[2]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Individual tree biomass estimation using terrestrial laser scanning , 2013 .

[3]  Q. Guo,et al.  A bottom-up approach to segment individual deciduous trees using leaf-off lidar point cloud data , 2014 .

[4]  M I Disney,et al.  Weighing trees with lasers: advances, challenges and opportunities , 2018, Interface Focus.

[5]  N. Koutsias,et al.  Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning to Measure Forest Inventory Parameters in a Mediterranean Coniferous Stand of Western Greece , 2017, PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science.

[6]  Lilian Blanc,et al.  Error propagation in biomass estimation in tropical forests , 2013 .

[7]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories , 2016 .

[8]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Feasibility of Terrestrial laser scanning for collecting stem volume information from single trees , 2017 .

[9]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Realistic Forest Stand Reconstruction from Terrestrial LiDAR for Radiative Transfer Modelling , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[10]  H. Spiecker,et al.  Non Destructive Method for Biomass Prediction Combining TLS Derived Tree Volume and Wood Density , 2015 .

[11]  Markku Åkerblom,et al.  Automatic tree species recognition with quantitative structure models , 2017 .

[12]  Vu Thanh Nam,et al.  Biomass dynamics in a logged forest: the role of wood density , 2018, Journal of Plant Research.

[13]  Luke Wallace,et al.  Non‐destructive estimation of above‐ground surface and near‐surface biomass using 3D terrestrial remote sensing techniques , 2017 .

[14]  Christian Jauvin,et al.  PypeTree: A Tool for Reconstructing Tree Perennial Tissues from Point Clouds , 2014, Sensors.

[15]  M. Herold,et al.  Nondestructive estimates of above‐ground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning , 2015 .

[16]  O. Phillips,et al.  The importance of crown dimensions to improve tropical tree biomass estimates. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[17]  M. Segura,et al.  Allometric Models for Tree Volume and Total Aboveground Biomass in a Tropical Humid Forest in Costa Rica 1 , 2005 .

[18]  Abderrahim Nemmaoui,et al.  Developing Allometric Equations for Teak Plantations Located in the Coastal Region of Ecuador from Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data , 2019, Forests.

[19]  Richard Condit,et al.  Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  M. Herold,et al.  Tree Biomass Equations from Terrestrial LiDAR: A Case Study in Guyana , 2019, Forests.

[21]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Estimating canopy structure and biomass in bamboo forests using airborne LiDAR data , 2019, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[22]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Plot-Scale Forest Measurement , 2015, Current Forestry Reports.

[23]  Sruthi M. Krishna Moorthy,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning for non-destructive estimates of liana stem biomass , 2020 .

[24]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Fast Automatic Precision Tree Models from Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[25]  N. Barbier,et al.  Using terrestrial laser scanning data to estimate large tropical trees biomass and calibrate allometric models: A comparison with traditional destructive approach , 2017 .

[26]  M. Herold,et al.  Estimation of above‐ground biomass of large tropical trees with terrestrial LiDAR , 2017 .

[27]  On the relationship of fractal geometry and tree–stand metrics on point clouds derived from terrestrial laser scanning , 2020, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[28]  Anthony G. Vorster,et al.  Non-destructive aboveground biomass estimation of coniferous trees using terrestrial LiDAR , 2017 .

[29]  M. Herold,et al.  Data acquisition considerations for Terrestrial Laser Scanning of forest plots , 2017 .

[30]  D. Clark,et al.  Tropical forest biomass estimation and the fallacy of misplaced concreteness , 2012 .

[31]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  A New Method for Segmenting Individual Trees from the Lidar Point Cloud , 2012 .

[32]  Heinrich Spiecker,et al.  SimpleTree —An Efficient Open Source Tool to Build Tree Models from TLS Clouds , 2015 .

[33]  W. Zeng,et al.  A New General Allometric Biomass Model , 2011 .

[34]  Markku Åkerblom,et al.  Analysis of Geometric Primitives in Quantitative Structure Models of Tree Stems , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[35]  Hao Li,et al.  A New Quantitative Approach to Tree Attributes Estimation Based on LiDAR Point Clouds , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[36]  J. Chave,et al.  Towards a Worldwide Wood Economics Spectrum 2 . L E a D I N G D I M E N S I O N S I N W O O D F U N C T I O N , 2022 .

[37]  Ronald E. McRoberts,et al.  Effects of Measurement Errors on Individual Tree Stem Volume Estimates for the Austrian National Forest Inventory , 2014 .

[38]  F. Rocca,et al.  The BIOMASS mission: Mapping global forest biomass to better understand the terrestrial carbon cycle , 2011 .

[39]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  Global Allocation Rules for Patterns of Biomass Partitioning in Seed Plants , 2002, Science.

[40]  Fengli Zhang,et al.  Cost, energy use and GHG emissions for forest biomass harvesting operations , 2016 .

[41]  Lammert Kooistra,et al.  Non-destructive tree volume estimation through quantitative structure modelling: Comparing UAV laser scanning with terrestrial LIDAR , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[42]  Harri Kaartinen,et al.  APPROXIMATION OF VOLUME AND BRANCH SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF TREES FROM LASER SCANNER DATA , 2012 .

[43]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Wood density in dense forest in central Amazonia, Brazil , 2005 .

[44]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Retrieval of Forest Aboveground Biomass and Stem Volume with Airborne Scanning LiDAR , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[45]  Di Wang,et al.  Unsupervised semantic and instance segmentation of forest point clouds , 2020 .

[46]  K. Zhao,et al.  Retrieving the gap fraction, element clumping index, and leaf area index of individual trees using single-scan data from a terrestrial laser scanner , 2017 .

[47]  M. Herold,et al.  Quantifying branch architecture of tropical trees using terrestrial LiDAR and 3D modelling , 2018, Trees.

[48]  B. Nelson,et al.  Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees , 2014, Global change biology.

[49]  Richard A. Fournier,et al.  The structural and radiative consistency of three-dimensional tree reconstructions from terrestrial lidar , 2009 .

[50]  P. Raumonen,et al.  Massive-Scale Tree Modelling from Tls Data , 2015 .

[51]  Bogdan M. Strimbu,et al.  Comparison of Mature Douglas-Firs' Crown Structures Developed with Two Quantitative Structural Models Using TLS Point Clouds for Neighboring Trees in a Natural Regime Stand , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[52]  Ning Ye,et al.  Analysing the potential of UAV point cloud as input in quantitative structure modelling for assessment of woody biomass of single trees , 2019, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.