A novel prediction method for lymph node involvement in endometrial cancer: machine learning

Objective The necessity of lymphadenectomy and the prediction of lymph node involvement (LNI) in endometrial cancer (EC) have been hotly-debated questions in recent years. Machine learning is a broad field that can produce results and estimations. In this study we constructed prediction models for EC patients using the Naïve Bayes machine learning algorithm for LNI prediction. Methods The study assessed 762 patients with EC. Algorithm models were based on the following histopathological factors: V1: final histology; V2: presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI); V3: grade; V4: tumor diameter; V5: depth of myometrial invasion (MI); V6: cervical glandular stromal invasion (CGSI); V7: tubal or ovarian involvement; and V8: pelvic LNI. Logistic regression analysis was also used to evaluate the independent factors affecting LNI. Results The mean age of patients was 59.1 years. LNI was detected in 102 (13.4%) patients. Para-aortic LNI (PaLNI) was detected in 54 (7.1%) patients, of which four patients had isolated PaLNI. The accuracy rate of the algorithm models was found to be between 84.2% and 88.9% and 85.0% and 97.6% for LNI and PaLNI, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the histologic type, LVSI, depth of MI, and CGSI were independently and significantly associated with LNI (p<0.001 for all). Conclusions Machine learning may have a place in the decision tree for the management of EC. This is a preliminary report about the use of a new statistical technique. Larger studies with the addition of sentinel lymph node status, laboratory findings, or imaging results with machine learning algorithms may herald a new era in the management of EC.

[1]  R. Barakat,et al.  The incidence of symptomatic lower-extremity lymphedema following treatment of uterine corpus malignancies: a 12-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. , 2006, Gynecologic oncology.

[2]  A. Mariani,et al.  A prospective assessment of the reliability of frozen section to direct intraoperative decision making in endometrial cancer. , 2012, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  T. Gungor,et al.  Risk factors for paraaortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer , 2017, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  S. Pecorelli Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium , 2009 .

[5]  P. Kjølhede,et al.  Risk factors for lymph node metastases in women with endometrial cancer: A population‐based, nation‐wide register study—On behalf of the Swedish Gynecological Cancer Group , 2017, International journal of cancer.

[6]  S. Vitale,et al.  Preoperative work-up for definition of lymph node risk involvement in early stage endometrial cancer: 5-year follow-up , 2017, Updates in Surgery.

[7]  J. Lancaster,et al.  Molecular determinants for lymph node metastasis in clinically early-stage endometrial cancer. , 2016, Oncology letters.

[8]  Soo Beom Choi,et al.  Intraoperative Diagnosis Support Tool for Serous Ovarian Tumors Based on Microarray Data Using Multicategory Machine Learning , 2015, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[9]  N. Sakuragi,et al.  Systematic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer , 2013, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[10]  B. Bundy,et al.  Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study , 1987, Cancer.

[11]  Brendan J. Frey,et al.  Machine Learning in Genomic Medicine: A Review of Computational Problems and Data Sets , 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  J. Shepherd Revised FIGO staging for gynaecological cancer , 1989, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[13]  E. Fulcheri,et al.  Intraoperative Frozen Section Risk Assessment Accurately Tailors the Surgical Staging in Patients Affected by Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: The Application of 2 Different Risk Algorithms , 2014, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[14]  Yingmei Wang,et al.  Predictive value of serum HE4 and CA125 concentrations for lymphatic metastasis of endometrial cancer , 2017, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[15]  Brett Lantz,et al.  Machine learning with R : learn how to use R to apply powerful machine learning methods and gain an insight into real-world applications , 2013 .

[16]  John D. Kelleher,et al.  Fundamentals of Machine Learning for Predictive Data Analytics: Algorithms, Worked Examples, and Case Studies , 2015 .

[17]  Richard G. Moore,et al.  Predictors for lymph nodes involvement in low risk endometrial cancer , 2017, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[18]  C. Coutant,et al.  A Predictive Model Using Histopathologic Characteristics of Early-Stage Type 1 Endometrial Cancer to Identify Patients at High Risk for Lymph Node Metastasis , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[19]  Canada.,et al.  Data Mining and Machine Learning in Astronomy , 2009, 0906.2173.

[20]  K. Hatch,et al.  Assessment of the Role of Intraoperative Frozen Section in Guiding Surgical Staging for Endometrial Cancer , 2016, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[21]  Matthias Rupp,et al.  Big Data Meets Quantum Chemistry Approximations: The Δ-Machine Learning Approach. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[22]  Søren Brunak,et al.  Finding Cervical Cancer Symptoms in Swedish Clinical Text using a Machine Learning Approach and NegEx , 2015, AMIA.

[23]  T. Herzog,et al.  A preoperative and intraoperative scoring system to predict nodal metastasis in endometrial cancer , 2017, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[24]  B. Bundy,et al.  Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study , 1987, Cancer.

[25]  A. Fader,et al.  Sentinel lymph node assessment in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  M. J. Webb,et al.  Potential therapeutic role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in node-positive endometrial cancer. , 2000, Gynecologic oncology.

[27]  R. Von Eyben,et al.  Nomogram to Predict Risk of Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer , 2016, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[28]  C. Mathers,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[29]  Y. Xiong,et al.  Overexpression of microRNA-205 predicts lymph node metastasis and indicates an unfavorable prognosis in endometrial cancer , 2016, Oncology letters.

[30]  Yoram Reich,et al.  Machine Learning Techniques for Civil Engineering Problems , 1997 .

[31]  M. Parmar,et al.  Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study , 2009, The Lancet.

[32]  Igor Kononenko,et al.  Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective , 2001, Artif. Intell. Medicine.