Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems

The present paper analyzes the self-generated explanations (from talk-aloud protocols) that “Good” ond “Poor” students produce while studying worked-out exomples of mechanics problems, and their subsequent reliance on examples during problem solving. We find that “Good” students learn with understanding: They generate many explanations which refine and expand the conditions for the action ports of the exomple solutions, ond relate these actions to principles in the text. These self-explanations are guided by accurate monitoring of their own understanding and misunderstanding. Such learning results in example-independent knowledge and in a better understanding of the principles presented in the text. “Poor” students do not generate sufficient self-explonations, monitor their learning inaccurately, and subsequently rely heovily an examples. We then discuss the role of self-explanations in facilitating problem solving, as well OS the adequacy of current Al models of explanation-based learning to account for these psychological findings.

[1]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  David E. Kieras,et al.  The Acquisition of Procedures from Text: A Production-System Analysis of Transfer of Training. Technical Report No. 16. , 1985 .

[3]  G. Kearsley Questions and question asking in verbal discourse: A cross-disciplinary review , 1976 .

[4]  L M Reder,et al.  The role of elaborations in learning a skill from an instructional text , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  Learning to use a text processing system: Evidence from “thinking aloud” protocols , 1982, CHI '82.

[6]  J. S. Dowker,et al.  Fundamentals of Physics , 1970, Nature.

[7]  Anderson,et al.  LEVv The Effects of Category Generalizations and Instance Similarity on Schema Abstraction , 2022 .

[8]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Expertise in Problem Solving. , 1981 .

[9]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  Why and How to Learn Why: Analysis-Based Generalization of Procedures , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  R. Gagne,et al.  A study of the effects of verbalization on problem solving. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  A Comparative Review of Selected Methods for Learning from Examples , 1983 .

[12]  P. Pirolli,et al.  The role of learning from examples in the acquisition of recursive programming skills. , 1985 .

[13]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Usefulness of analogous solutions for solving algebra word problems , 1985 .

[14]  J. Sweller,et al.  The Use of Worked Examples as a Substitute for Problem Solving in Learning Algebra , 1985 .

[15]  Ann L. Brown Learning, remembering, and understanding , 1982 .

[16]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Differences in approaches to learning: An overview. , 1982 .

[17]  J. LeFevre,et al.  Do Written Instructions Need Examples , 1986 .

[18]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[19]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Problem solving and education. , 1980 .

[20]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  John R. Anderson,et al.  A Comparison of Texts and their Summaries: Memorial Consequences. , 1980 .

[22]  Kurt VanLehn Arithmetic Procedures are Induced from Examples. , 1985 .