Etoposide (VP-16) uptake by tumour spheroids and activity in the presence of Brij 30, formulation additives and sodium salicylate.

A number of additives typically used in the formulation of poorly soluble drugs can be shown to influence drug transport across various physiological barriers. Multicellular spheroids from a human neuroblastoma cell line (NB1-G) were used to investigate the effect of etoposide in solution, as its commercial formulation, Vepesid, in the presence of a nonionic surfactant, Brij 30, and a hydrotropic agent, sodium salicylate. Enhanced growth delay, apparently related to increased drug uptake, was observed both with the Vepesid and the sodium salicylate formulations. Brij 30, however, showed no enhancement of growth delay or drug uptake at a concentration at which it was not in itself cytotoxic. Significant morphological changes in the spheroid were observed at higher concentrations of additives, particularly with Brij 30, emphasizing the fact that many formulation additives cannot be used with impunity in tissue culture systems. The enhanced uptake of drug into tumour cells and potential synergy between additive and drug is worthy of further investigation.

[1]  T. Higuchi,et al.  Enhanced rectal absorption of insulin and heparin in rats in the presence of non‐surfactant adjuvants , 1981, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[2]  A. Florence Surfactant interactions with biomembranes and drug absorption , 1981 .

[3]  D. V. Von Hoff,et al.  VM 26 and VP 16–213: A comparative analysis , 1977, Cancer.

[4]  A. Gregor,et al.  Radiation studies on multicellular tumour spheroids derived from human neuroblastoma: absence of sparing effect of dose fractionation. , 1986, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[5]  P. Twentyman,et al.  Spheroids for studies of drug effects. , 1984, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.

[6]  R. Sutherland Importance of critical metabolites and cellular interactions in the biology of microregions of tumors , 1986, Cancer.

[7]  R. Weichselbaum,et al.  Limited penetration of methotrexate into human osteosarcoma spheroids as a proposed model for solid tumor resistance to adjuvant chemotherapy. , 1980, Cancer research.

[8]  T. Kwok,et al.  The relationship between tumour geometry and the response of tumour cells to cytotoxic drugs — An in vitro study using EMT6 multicellular spheroids , 1985, International journal of cancer.

[9]  G W Halbert,et al.  The effect of the non-ionic surfactant Brij 30 on the cytotoxicity of adriamycin in monolayer, spheroid and clonogenic culture systems. , 1987, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[10]  R. Durand Chemosensitivity testing in V79 spheroids: drug delivery and cellular microenvironment. , 1986, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  Y. Takatsuka,et al.  Effect of surfactants on the nasal absorption of insulin in rats , 1981 .

[12]  R K Jain,et al.  Transport of molecules in the tumor interstitium: a review. , 1987, Cancer research.

[13]  A. Florence,et al.  Non‐ionic surfactants and gastric mucosal transport of paraquat 1 , 1981, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[14]  M. Slevin,et al.  The Clinical Pharmacology of Etoposide and Teniposide , 1987, Clinical pharmacokinetics.