In situ repurposing of dendritic cells with CRISPR/Cas9-based nanomedicine to induce transplant tolerance.

Organ transplantation is the only effective method to treat end-stage organ failure. However, it is continuously plagued by immune rejection, which is mostly caused by T cell-mediated reactions. Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells, and blocking the costimulatory signaling molecule CD40 in DCs inhibits T cell activation and induces transplant tolerance. In this study, to relieve graft rejection, Cas9 mRNA (mCas9) and a guide RNA targeting the costimulatory molecule CD40 (gCD40) were prepared and encapsulated into poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PEG-b-PLGA)-based cationic lipid-assisted nanoparticles (CLAN), denoted CLANmCas9/gCD40. CLAN effectively delivered mCas9/gCD40 into DCs and disrupted CD40 in DCs at the genomic level both in vitro and in vivo. After intravenous injection into an acute mouse skin transplant model, CLANmCas9/gCD40-mediated CD40 disruption significantly inhibited T cell activation, which reduced graft damage and prolonged graft survival. This work provides a promising strategy for reprogramming DCs with nanoparticles carrying the CRISPR/Cas9 system to abate transplant rejection.

[1]  Z. Milas,et al.  Anti-CD40 Monoclonal Antibody Synergizes with CTLA4-Ig in Promoting Long-Term Graft Survival in Murine Models of Transplantation , 2009, The Journal of Immunology.

[2]  B. van Steensel,et al.  Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  David R. Liu,et al.  Efficient Delivery of Genome-Editing Proteins In Vitro and In Vivo , 2015 .

[4]  A. Chong,et al.  The impact of infection and tissue damage in solid-organ transplantation , 2012, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[5]  R. Pierson,et al.  Update on CD40 and CD154 blockade in transplant models. , 2015, Immunotherapy.

[6]  P. Linsley,et al.  Long-term acceptance of skin and cardiac allografts after blocking CD40 and CD28 pathways , 1996, Nature.

[7]  J. Gooch,et al.  Calcineurin inhibitors and immunosuppression – a tale of two isoforms , 2012, Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine.

[8]  R. Noelle,et al.  Molecular mechanism and function of CD40/CD40L engagement in the immune system , 2009, Immunological reviews.

[9]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Use of genome-editing tools to treat sickle cell disease , 2016, Human Genetics.

[10]  Daniel G. Anderson,et al.  Therapeutic genome editing by combined viral and non-viral delivery of CRISPR system components in vivo , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  Manfred Schmidt,et al.  Mapping the precision of genome editing , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  In-Young Jung,et al.  Unleashing the Therapeutic Potential of CAR-T Cell Therapy Using Gene-Editing Technologies , 2018, Molecules and cells.

[13]  Pavel Sumazin,et al.  Reprogramming metabolic pathways in vivo with CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to treat hereditary tyrosinaemia , 2016, Nature Communications.

[14]  David A. Scott,et al.  Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[15]  E. Geissler The influence of mTOR inhibitors on immunity and the relationship to post-transplant malignancy , 2013, Transplantation research.

[16]  M. Nussenzweig,et al.  Origin and development of dendritic cells , 2010, Immunological reviews.

[17]  K. Wood,et al.  Costimulation blockade: current perspectives and implications for therapy. , 2013, Transplantation.

[18]  George M. Church,et al.  In vivo gene editing in dystrophic mouse muscle and muscle stem cells , 2016, Science.

[19]  C. Law,et al.  Therapeutic interventions targeting CD40L (CD154) and CD40: the opportunities and challenges. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[20]  J. Hoying,et al.  CRISPR correction of a homozygous low‐density lipoprotein receptor mutation in familial hypercholesterolemia induced pluripotent stem cells , 2017, Hepatology communications.

[21]  S. Tullius,et al.  Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury and its Consequences on Immunity and Inflammation , 2014, Current Transplantation Reports.

[22]  P. Fairchild,et al.  Pharmacological manipulation of dendritic cells in the pursuit of transplantation tolerance , 2011, Current opinion in organ transplantation.

[23]  K. Chapman,et al.  The anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids, recent developments and mechanistic insights , 2011, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[24]  A. Thomson,et al.  Immunoregulatory functions of mTOR inhibition , 2009, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[25]  Ying Li,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9 delivery to hard-to-transfect cells via membrane deformation , 2015, Science Advances.

[26]  Jun Wang,et al.  Systemic delivery of siRNA with cationic lipid assisted PEG-PLA nanoparticles for cancer therapy. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[27]  Silvia Liu,et al.  Targeting genomic rearrangements in tumor cells using Cas9-mediated insertion of a suicide gene , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  R. Saidi,et al.  Challenges of Organ Shortage for Transplantation: Solutions and Opportunities , 2014, International journal of organ transplantation medicine.

[29]  Xianzhu Yang,et al.  Tumor acidity-sensitive linkage-bridged block copolymer for therapeutic siRNA delivery. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[30]  K. Wood,et al.  Regulatory immune cells in transplantation , 2012, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[31]  J. Sáez,et al.  Gap Junctions at the Dendritic Cell-T Cell Interface Are Key Elements for Antigen-Dependent T Cell Activation1 , 2009, The Journal of Immunology.

[32]  S. Quezada,et al.  CD40/CD154 interactions at the interface of tolerance and immunity. , 2004, Annual review of immunology.

[33]  Y. Kan,et al.  Seamless gene correction of β-thalassemia mutations in patient-specific iPSCs using CRISPR/Cas9 and piggyBac , 2014, Genome research.

[34]  E. Wherry,et al.  MyD88 Plays a Critical T Cell-Intrinsic Role in Supporting CD8 T Cell Expansion during Acute Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Infection1 , 2008, The Journal of Immunology.

[35]  R. Słomski,et al.  Improved Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 System Using Magnetic Nanoparticles into Porcine Fibroblast , 2018, Molecular Biotechnology.

[36]  Irene Georgakoudi,et al.  Efficient delivery of genome-editing proteins using bioreducible lipid nanoparticles , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Edward M. Callaway,et al.  In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration , 2016, Nature.

[38]  B. Tombach,et al.  Respiratory infections in immunocompromised patients: Lung findings using chest computed tomography , 2016, Radiology of Infectious Diseases.

[39]  R. Schwartz,et al.  A cell culture model for T lymphocyte clonal anergy. , 1990, Science.

[40]  Ning Wang,et al.  Artificial Virus Delivers CRISPR-Cas9 System for Genome Editing of Cells in Mice. , 2017, ACS nano.

[41]  R. David Hawkins,et al.  Muscle-specific CRISPR/Cas9 dystrophin gene editing ameliorates pathophysiology in a mouse model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy , 2017, Nature Communications.

[42]  Wei Wei,et al.  Molecular Mechanisms of T Cells Activation by Dendritic Cells in Autoimmune Diseases , 2018, Front. Pharmacol..

[43]  J. Boltze,et al.  Immunosuppression for in vivo research: state-of-the-art protocols and experimental approaches , 2016, Cellular & Molecular Immunology.

[44]  Johnny C. Hong,et al.  Ischaemia–reperfusion injury in liver transplantation—from bench to bedside , 2013, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology.

[45]  K. Wood,et al.  Regulatory lymphocytes: Regulatory T cells in transplantation tolerance , 2003, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[46]  C. Larsen,et al.  Translating costimulation blockade to the clinic: lessons learned from three pathways , 2009, Immunological reviews.

[47]  Hans Bitter,et al.  Determinants of response and resistance to CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[48]  A. Nakao,et al.  Graft-infiltrating host dendritic cells play a key role in organ transplant rejection , 2016, Nature Communications.

[49]  M. Ford,et al.  Novel insights into anti-CD40/CD154 immunotherapy in transplant tolerance. , 2015, Immunotherapy.

[50]  Dongsheng Duan,et al.  In vivo genome editing improves muscle function in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy , 2016, Science.

[51]  Gang Bao,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing for Disease Modeling and Therapy: Challenges and Opportunities for Nonviral Delivery. , 2017, Chemical reviews.

[52]  Josep M Grinyó,et al.  Why is organ transplantation clinically important? , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine.

[53]  Hao Zhu,et al.  Non-Viral CRISPR/Cas Gene Editing In Vitro and In Vivo Enabled by Synthetic Nanoparticle Co-Delivery of Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA. , 2017, Angewandte Chemie.

[54]  W. Bennett,et al.  Nephrotoxicity of immunosuppressive drugs: long-term consequences and challenges for the future. , 2000, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[55]  A. Kirk,et al.  Antigen-specific induced Foxp3+ regulatory T cells are generated following CD40/CD154 blockade , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Xiao-Hui Zhang,et al.  Off-target Effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Genome Engineering , 2015, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids.

[57]  Xianzhu Yang,et al.  Simultaneous elimination of cancer stem cells and bulk cancer cells by cationic-lipid-assisted nanoparticles for cancer therapy , 2018, Nano Research.