Identifiability of transient storage model parameters along a mountain stream

[1] Transient storage models are widely used in combination with tracer experiments to characterize stream reaches via calibrated parameter estimates. These parameters quantify the main transport and storage processes. However, it is implicitly assumed that calibrated parameters are uniquely identifiable and hence provide a unique characterization of the stream. We investigate parameter identifiability along with the stream conditions that control identifiability for 10 breakthrough curves (BTC) for 100 m pulse injections along Stringer Creek, Montana, USA. Identifiability is assessed through global, variance-based sensitivity analysis of the one-dimensional transport with inflow and storage model (OTIS). Results indicate that the main channel area parameter A and the dispersion coefficient D were the most sensitive parameters and, therefore, likely to be identifiable across all timescales and reaches. Identifiability of transient storage zone size As fell into two categories along Stringer Creek. As was identifiable for lower elevation regions, corresponding to a constrained valley, higher stream slopes, and in-channel roughness, but not for upper stream regions, corresponding to a wider valley floor, flatter stream slopes, and low roughness. The storage zone exchange parameter α was nonidentifiable across all study reaches. Our results suggest that only some of the processes represented in the model will be relevant and, therefore, identifiable for pulse injection data. As such, calibrated parameter estimates should be accompanied by an assessment of parameter sensitivity or uncertainty. We also show that parameter identifiability varies with stream setting along Stringer Creek, suggesting that physical characteristics directly influence the identification of dominant stream processes.

[1]  R. Hall,et al.  Relating transient storage to channel complexity in streams of varying land use in Jackson Hole, Wyoming , 2007 .

[2]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Parameter and structural identifiability concepts and ambiguities: a critical review and analysis. , 1980, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  P. Reed,et al.  Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions Comparing Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Advance Lumped Watershed Model Identification and Evaluation , 2022 .

[4]  C. Cáceres,et al.  Temporal variation, dormancy, and coexistence: a field test of the storage effect. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Michael N. Gooseff,et al.  Comparing transient storage modeling and residence time distribution (RTD) analysis in geomorphically varied reaches in the Lookout Creek basin, Oregon, USA , 2003 .

[6]  Robert L. Runkel,et al.  One-Dimensional Transport with Inflow and Storage (OTIS): A Solute Transport Model for Streams and Rivers , 1998 .

[7]  M. E. Campana,et al.  ALLUVIAL CHARACTERISTICS, GROUNDWATER–SURFACE WATER EXCHANGE AND HYDROLOGICAL RETENTION IN HEADWATER STREAMS , 1997 .

[8]  Michael N. Gooseff,et al.  Channel water balance and exchange with subsurface flow along a mountain headwater stream in Montana, United States , 2009 .

[9]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Model identification for hydrological forecasting under uncertainty , 2005 .

[10]  L. Lautz,et al.  The effect of transient storage on nitrate uptake lengths in streams: an inter‐site comparison , 2007 .

[11]  V. Zlotnik,et al.  Impact of heterogeneity, bed forms, and stream curvature on subchannel hyporheic exchange , 2004 .

[12]  Nicholas G. Aumen,et al.  Concepts and methods for assessing solute dynamics in stream ecosystems , 1990 .

[13]  L. Barber,et al.  Conservative and reactive solute transport in constructed wetlands , 2004 .

[14]  Michael N. Gooseff,et al.  Exploring changes in the spatial distribution of stream baseflow generation during a seasonal recession , 2012 .

[15]  Robert L. Runkel,et al.  A new metric for determining the importance of transient storage , 2002, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[16]  M. Bayani Cardenas,et al.  A model for lateral hyporheic flow based on valley slope and channel sinuosity , 2009 .

[17]  Jay L. Devore,et al.  Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences , 1982 .

[18]  John R Fieberg,et al.  Assessing uncertainty in ecological systems using global sensitivity analyses: a case example of simulated wolf reintroduction effects on elk , 2005 .

[19]  Roy A. Walters,et al.  Simulation of solute transport in a mountain pool‐and‐riffle stream: A transient storage model , 1983 .

[20]  L. Lautz,et al.  Impact of debris dams on hyporheic interaction along a semi‐arid stream , 2006 .

[21]  B. McGlynn,et al.  Intrastream variability in solute transport: Hydrologic and geomorphic controls on solute retention , 2013 .

[22]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices , 2002 .

[23]  Mary C. Freeman,et al.  Hydrologic Connectivity and the Contribution of Stream Headwaters to Ecological Integrity at Regional Scales 1 , 2007 .

[24]  Jeremy B. Jones,et al.  17 – Surface–Subsurface Interactions: Past, Present, and Future , 2000 .

[25]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Algorithm 573: NL2SOL—An Adaptive Nonlinear Least-Squares Algorithm [E4] , 1981, TOMS.

[26]  I. Sobol On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals , 1967 .

[27]  Karl B. Schnelle,et al.  Closure of "Predicting Effects of Dead Zones on Stream Mixing" , 1970 .

[28]  Steven M. Gorelick,et al.  A Statistical Methodology for Estimating Transport Parameters: Theory and Applications to One‐Dimensional Advectivec‐Dispersive Systems , 1986 .

[29]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  Experimental design for estimating parameters of rate‐limited mass transfer: Analysis of stream tracer studies , 1997 .

[30]  P. R. Johnston,et al.  Parameter optimization for watershed models , 1976 .

[31]  Peter V Tryon,et al.  STARPAC :: the standards time series and regression package , 1987 .

[32]  B. Vaughn,et al.  Determining long time‐scale hyporheic zone flow paths in Antarctic streams , 2003 .

[33]  Michael N. Gooseff,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of conservative and reactive stream transient storage models applied to field data from multiple-reach experiments , 2005 .

[34]  S. Findlay Importance of surface‐subsurface exchange in stream ecosystems: The hyporheic zone , 1995 .

[35]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity analysis practices: Strategies for model-based inference , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[36]  Michael N. Gooseff,et al.  Hydrologic connectivity between landscapes and streams: Transferring reach‐ and plot‐scale understanding to the catchment scale , 2009 .

[37]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2004 .

[38]  K. Beven Environmental Modelling , 2007 .

[39]  S. Wondzell Effect of morphology and discharge on hyporheic exchange flows in two small streams in the Cascade Mountains of Oregon, USA , 2006 .

[40]  C. Tiedeman,et al.  Effective Groundwater Model Calibration , 2007 .

[41]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[42]  K. Bencala,et al.  The Effect of streambed topography on surface‐subsurface water exchange in mountain catchments , 1993 .

[43]  K. Bencala,et al.  Variations in surface water‐ground water interactions along a headwater mountain stream: Comparisons between transient storage and water balance analyses , 2013 .

[44]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[45]  Paul Bratley,et al.  Algorithm 659: Implementing Sobol's quasirandom sequence generator , 1988, TOMS.

[46]  K. Bevenb,et al.  Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data , 1998 .

[47]  R. Ibbitt,et al.  Designing conceptual catchment models for automatic fitting methods , 2022 .

[48]  Neil McIntyre,et al.  Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall‐runoff modelling: dynamic identifiability analysis , 2003 .

[49]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  1 – Quantifying Hydrologic Interactions between Streams and Their Subsurface Hyporheic Zones , 2000 .

[50]  P. Mulholland,et al.  Evidence that hyporheic zones increase heterotrophic metabolism and phosphorus uptake in forest streams , 1997 .

[51]  Clifford N. Dahm,et al.  Wholeߚstream metabolism in two montane streams: Contribution of the hyporheic zone , 2001 .

[52]  Keith Beven,et al.  Functional classification and evaluation of hydrographs based on Multicomponent Mapping (Mx) , 2004 .

[53]  M. Doyle,et al.  In‐channel transient storage and associated nutrient retention: Evidence from experimental manipulations , 2005 .

[54]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[55]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[56]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: The question of parameter observability and uniqueness , 1983 .

[57]  Emily H. Stanley,et al.  THE FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE HYPORHEIC ZONE IN STREAMS AND RIVERS , 1998 .

[58]  Michael N. Gooseff,et al.  A modelling study of hyporheic exchange pattern and the sequence, size, and spacing of stream bedforms in mountain stream networks, Oregon, USA , 2006 .

[59]  Brian L. McGlynn,et al.  Landscape structure and climate influences on hydrologic response , 2011 .

[60]  J. Bahr,et al.  Direct comparison of kinetic and local equilibrium formulations for solute transport affected by surface reactions , 1987 .

[61]  R. Runkel,et al.  Analysis of Transient Storage Subject to Unsteady Flow: Diel Flow Variation in an Antarctic Stream , 1998, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[62]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  Evaluating the Reliability of the Stream Tracer Approach to Characterize Stream‐Subsurface Water Exchange , 1996 .

[63]  C. Tate,et al.  Phosphate dynamics in an acidic mountain stream: interactions involving algal uptake , 1995 .

[64]  C. Tiedeman,et al.  Effective Groundwater Model Calibration: With Analysis of Data, Sensitivities, Predictions, and Uncertainty , 2007 .

[65]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  Dynamic identifiability analysis of the transient storage model for solute transport in rivers , 2002, Journal of Hydroinformatics.

[66]  D. J. D'Angelo,et al.  Transient Storage in Appalachian and Cascade Mountain Streams as Related to Hydraulic Characteristics , 1993, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[67]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Multi‐method global sensitivity analysis (MMGSA) for modelling floodplain hydrological processes , 2008 .

[68]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  Influence of constant rate versus slug injection experiment type on parameter identifiability in a 1‐D transient storage model for stream solute transport , 2013 .

[69]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[70]  J. Morrice,et al.  The hydraulic characteristics and geochemistry of hyporheic and parafluvial zones in Arctic tundra streams, north slope, Alaska , 2003 .

[71]  Phillip E. Farnes,et al.  Comparisons of hydrology, geology, and physical characteristics between Tenderfoot Creek Experimental Forest (east side) Montana, and Coram Experimental Forest (west side) Montana , 1995 .

[72]  I. Sobol Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[73]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  A Primer for the Monte Carlo Method , 1994 .

[74]  G. Pickup TESTING THE EFFICIENCY OF ALGORITHMS AND STRATEGIES FOR AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION OF RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS , 1977 .

[75]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. , 2009, Genome research.

[76]  K. Bencala,et al.  Automated calibration of a stream solute transport model: implications for interpretation of biogeochemical parameters , 2003, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[77]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty , 1987 .

[78]  F. Bormann,et al.  Concepts and Methods for Assessing Solute Dynamics in Stream Ecosystems , 2007 .

[79]  William R. Wise,et al.  Analysis of constructed treatment wetland hydraulics with the transient storage model OTIS , 2003 .

[80]  C. Welty,et al.  Estimation of solute transport and storage parameters in a stream with anthropogenically produced unsteady flow and industrial bromide input , 2004 .