Diagnosing Diagnoses in Swedish Clinical Records
暂无分享,去创建一个
Electronic clinical record systems are becoming the standard for many hospitals, providing an extensive amount of valuable information which could be used for important research in di erent research areas. In our project, we have access to a large set of de-identi ed clinical records from several departments in one of the largest hospitals in Sweden: Karolinska University Hospital. To our knowledge, this set is unique in at least two ways; it is the rst set of clinical records written in Swedish, and it is the rst set covering several medical departments, thus providing an invaluable data set for many research areas. Clinical records contain both structured and unstructured entries, such as measurement values and sections of free text. However, the free text sections of clinical records have not, until recently, been used for further research. Such sections hold great potential for inventive text mining and computational linguistics research. The language use in clinical records is very speci c and noisy, containing domain-speci c vocabulary, and often ad-hoc abbreviations and misspellings. Moreover, these types of text contain a potentially large amount of speculation, uncertainty and negation together with certainty and con rmation. This property is signi cant for the diagnosis and documentation procedure, and is very important to extract. For many text mining and information extraction tools, such issues are seldom taken into account, which we believe is problematic. These aspects have gained a lot of interest recently, and many methods for handling such parts in text sets have been proposed. However, most experiments have been performed on text sets in English, and mostly on similar contents. We plan to apply and evaluate existing state-of-the-art methods on Swedish clinical records. Moreover, we plan to develop these methods further with the goal of being as language independent as possible and generic for di erent medical specializations.
[1] K. Bretonnel Cohen,et al. A shared task involving multi-label classification of clinical free text , 2007, BioNLP@ACL.
[2] Halil Kilicoglu,et al. Recognizing speculative language in biomedical research articles: a linguistically motivated perspective , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.
[3] János Csirik,et al. The BioScope corpus: annotation for negation, uncertainty and their scope in biomedical texts , 2008, BioNLP.