Improved resolution in practical light microscopy by means of a glass-fiber 2 π-tilting device

The spatial resolution of a conventional light microscope or a confocal laser scanning microscope can be determined by calculating the point spread function for the objective used. Normally, ideal conditions are assumed for these calculations. Such conditions, however, are often not fulfilled in biological applications especially in those cases where biochemical requirements (e.g. buffer conditions) influence the specimen preparation on the microscope slide (i.e. 'practical' light microscopy). It has been shown that the problem of a reduced z- resolution in 3D-microscopy (optical sectioning) can be overcome by a capillary in a 2(pi) - tilting device that allows object rotation into an optimal perspective. The application of the glass capillary instead of a standard slide has an additional influence on the imaging properties of the microscope. Therefore, another 2(pi) -tilting device was developed, using a glass fiber for object fixation and rotation. Such a fiber could be covered by standard cover glasses. To estimate the resolution of this setup, point spread functions were measured under different conditions using fluorescent microspheres of subwavelength dimensions. Results obtained from standard slide setups were compared to the glass fiber setup. These results showed that in practice rotation leads to an overall 3D-resolution improvement.

[1]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Volume ratios of painted chromosome territories 5, 7 and X in female human cell nuclei studied with confocal laser microscopy and the Cavalieri estimator , 1995 .

[2]  Michael Hausmann,et al.  Optical sectioning and 3d-image reconstruction to determine the volume of specific chromosome regions in human interphase cell nuclei , 1991 .

[3]  J Bille,et al.  Reconstructing 3-D light-microscopic images by digital image processing. , 1985, Applied optics.

[4]  G. J. Brakenhoff,et al.  Three-dimensional chromatin distribution in neuroblastoma nuclei shown by confocal scanning laser microscopy , 1985, Nature.

[5]  C Cremer,et al.  Differences of size and shape of active and inactive X‐chromosome domains in human amniotic fluid cell nuclei , 1993, Microscopy research and technique.

[6]  E. Wolf,et al.  Electromagnetic diffraction in optical systems - I. An integral representation of the image field , 1959, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[7]  Ernst H. K. Stelzer,et al.  A setup for a confocal scanning laser interference microscope , 1986 .

[8]  C Cremer,et al.  Considerations on a laser-scanning-microscope with high resolution and depth of field. , 1978, Microscopica acta.

[9]  E. Wolf,et al.  Electromagnetic diffraction in optical systems, II. Structure of the image field in an aplanatic system , 1959, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[10]  G. A. Laub,et al.  Three-Dimensional Object Representation In Microscopic Imaging Systems , 1986, Other Conferences.