Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex

Parietal brain regions have been implicated in reorienting of visuospatial attention in location-cueing paradigms when misleading advance information is provided in form of a spatially invalid cue. The difference in reaction times to invalidly and validly cued targets is termed the "validity effect" and used as a behavioral measure for attentional reorienting. Behavioral studies suggest that the magnitude of the validity effect depends on the ratio of validly to invalidly cued targets (termed cue validity), i.e., on the amount of top-down information provided. Using fMRI, we investigated the effects of a cue validity manipulation upon the neural mechanisms underlying attentional reorienting using valid and invalid spatial cues in the context of 90% and 60% cue validity, respectively. We hypothesized that increased parietal activation would be elicited when subjects need to reorient their attention in a context of high cue validity. Behaviorally, subjects showed significantly higher validity effects in the high as compared to the low cue validity condition, indicating slower reorienting. The neuroimaging data revealed higher activation of right inferior parietal and right frontal cortex in the 90% than in the 60% cue validity condition. We conclude that the amount of top-down information provided by predictive cues influences the neural correlates of reorienting of visuospatial attention by modulating activation of a right fronto-parietal attentional network.

[1]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Monetary incentives enhance processing in brain regions mediating top-down control of attention. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  C. Kennard,et al.  The anatomy of visual neglect. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  Andrew R. Mayer,et al.  Neural networks underlying endogenous and exogenous visual–spatial orienting , 2004, NeuroImage.

[4]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Neural sources involved in auditory target detection and novelty processing: an event-related fMRI study. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[5]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Cerebral correlates of alerting, orienting and reorienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[6]  J. Jonides.  Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement. , 1980, Canadian journal of psychology.

[7]  O Josephs,et al.  Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging: modelling, inference and optimization. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  Thomas R. Knösche,et al.  Who Comes First? The Role of the Prefrontal and Parietal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  R. Goebel,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: an fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  A. Nobre,et al.  The Large-Scale Neural Network for Spatial Attention Displays Multifunctional Overlap But Differential Asymmetry , 1999, NeuroImage.

[13]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[15]  E. Miller,et al.  The prefontral cortex and cognitive control , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  L. R. Gottlob,et al.  Location cuing and response time distributions in visual attention , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Inferential Impact of Global Signal Covariates in Functional Neuroimaging Analyses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[18]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Corbetta,et al.  An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  G. R. Fink,et al.  The modulatory effects of nicotine on parietal cortex activity in a cued target detection task depend on cue reliability , 2006, Neuroscience.

[21]  G. Vallar.  Extrapersonal Visual Unilateral Spatial Neglect and Its Neuroanatomy , 2001, NeuroImage.

[22]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention: Object-Based Selection of a Region in Space , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Darren R Gitelman,et al.  ILAB: A program for postexperimental eye movement analysis , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[24]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  J. Downar,et al.  A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Analysis of Response Time Distributions: An Example Using the Stroop Task , 1991 .

[27]  L. Riggio,et al.  The relationship between central cues and peripheral cues in covert visual orientation , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural Systems for Visual Orienting and Their Relationships to Spatial Working Memory , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[30]  Angela J. Yu,et al.  Uncertainty, Neuromodulation, and Attention , 2005, Neuron.

[31]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[32]  K. Zilles,et al.  Nicotine Modulates Reorienting of Visuospatial Attention and Neural Activity in Human Parietal Cortex , 2005, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[33]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  D. Perani,et al.  The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[36]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Searching for “the Top” in Top-Down Control , 2005, Neuron.

[37]  E. Miller,et al.  THE PREFRONTAL CORTEX AND COGNITIVE CONTROL , 2000 .

[38]  D. Spalding.  The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[39]  G. Fink,et al.  Rumlicher Neglect@@@Spatial neglect , 2004 .

[40]  J. Jonides.  Further toward a model of the Mind’s eye’s movement , 1983 .

[41]  D. Madden,et al.  Selective attention and visual search: revision of an allocation model and application to age differences. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Joel R. Meyer,et al.  A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[43]  J. Marshall,et al.  Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  QMPE: Estimating Lognormal, Wald, and Weibull RT distributions with a parameter-dependent lower bound , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[45]  Hermann von Helmholtz,et al.  Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1962 .

[46]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Spatial attention deficits in humans: a comparison of superior parietal and temporal-parietal junction lesions. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[47]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Coordination of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Control in Human Cortex , 2005, Psychological science.