Meteorology applied to urban air pollution problems: concepts from COST 715

The outcome of COST 715 is reviewed from the viewpoint of a potential user who is required to consider urban meteorology within an air pollution assessment. It is shown that descriptive concepts are helpful for understanding the complex structure of the urban boundary layer, but that they only apply under a limited number of conditions. However such concepts are necessary to gain insight into both simple and complex air pollution models. It is argued that wider considerations are needed when considering routine air quality assessments involving an air quality model's formulation and pedigree. Moreover there appears to be a reluctance from model developers to move away from familiar concepts of the atmospheric boundary layer even if they are not appropriate to urban areas. An example is given from COST 715 as to how routine urban meteorological measurements of wind speed may be used and adapted for air quality assessments. Reference to the full COST 715 study is made which provides further details.

[1]  Ari Karppinen,et al.  A modelling system for predicting urban air pollution: model description and applications in the Helsinki metropolitan area , 2000 .

[2]  A. Baklanov.  The mixing height in urban areas - a review , 2002 .

[3]  Mathias W. Rotach,et al.  Mean Flow and Turbulence Characteristics in an Urban Roughness Sublayer , 2004 .

[4]  M. Rotach.  Simulation Of Urban-Scale Dispersion Using A Lagrangian Stochastic Dispersion Model , 2001 .

[5]  T. Oke,et al.  Turbulent Heat Fluxes in Urban Areas: Observations and a Local-Scale Urban Meteorological Parameterization Scheme (LUMPS) , 2002 .

[6]  Stylianos Rafailidis,et al.  Influence of Building Areal Density and Roof Shape on the Wind Characteristics Above a Town , 1997 .

[7]  A. Baklanov.  Parameterisation of SBL Height in Atmospheric Pollution Models , 2004 .

[8]  Michael Schatzmann,et al.  Meteorology applied to urban air pollution problems: COST 715 , 2001 .

[9]  Stephen E. Belcher,et al.  Mean Winds Through an Inhomogeneous Urban Canopy , 2005 .

[10]  Chapter 2 A Novel Approach to Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling : The Puff-Particle Model ( PPM ) , 1999 .

[11]  Mathias W. Rotach,et al.  Turbulence close to a rough urban surface part II: Variances and gradients , 1993 .

[12]  Mathias W. Rotach,et al.  A novel approach to atmospheric dispersion modelling: The Puff‐Particle Model , 1998 .

[13]  J. Kukkonen,et al.  Evaluation of two versions of the HIRLAM numerical weather prediction model during an air pollution episode in southern Finland , 2005 .

[14]  Ari Karppinen,et al.  The refinement of a meteorological pre-processor for the urban environment , 2000 .

[15]  P. Suppan,et al.  Harmonisation within atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes , 2004 .

[16]  Timothy R. Oke,et al.  Aerodynamic Properties of Urban Areas Derived from Analysis of Surface Form , 1999 .

[17]  The refinement of a meteorological preprocessor for the urban environment , 2001 .

[18]  Alan G. Davenport,et al.  Estimating the roughness of cities and sheltered country , 2000 .

[19]  A. Clappier,et al.  An Urban Surface Exchange Parameterisation for Mesoscale Models , 2002 .

[20]  J. Kukkonen,et al.  Analysis and evaluation of selected local-scale PM10 air pollution episodes in four European cities: Helsinki, London, Milan and Oslo , 2005 .

[21]  John Kim,et al.  Rough-Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers , 2004 .

[22]  A. Christen,et al.  Energy and radiation balance of a central European city , 2004 .

[23]  V. Masson,et al.  Investigating the Surface Energy Balance in Urban Areas – Recent Advances and Future Needs , 2002 .