Computations of Viking Lander Capsule Hypersonic Aerodynamics with Comparisons to Ground and Flight Data

Comparisons are made between the LAURA Navier-Stokes code and Viking Lander Capsule hypersonic aerodynamics data from ground and flight measurements. Wind tunnel data are available for a 3.48 percent scale model at Mach 6 and a 2.75 percent scale model at Mach 10.35, both under perfect gas air conditions. Viking Lander 1 aerodynamics flight data also exist from on-board instrumentation for velocities between 2900 and 4400 m/sec (Mach 14 to 23.3). LAURA flowfield solutions are obtained for the geometry as tested or flown, including sting effects at tunnel conditions and finite-rate chemistry effects in flight. Using the flight vehicle center-of-gravity location (trim angle approx. equals -11.1 deg), the computed trim angle at tunnel conditions is within 0.31 degrees of the angle derived from Mach 6 data and 0.13 degrees from the Mach 10.35 trim angle. LAURA Mach 6 trim lift and drag force coefficients are within 2 percent of measured data, and computed trim lift-to-drag ratio is within 4 percent of the data. Computed trim lift and drag force coefficients at Mach 10.35 are within 5 percent and 3 percent, respectively, of wind tunnel data. Computed trim lift-to-drag ratio is within 2 percent of the Mach 10.35 data. Using the nominal density profile and center-of-gravity location, LAURA trim angle at flight conditions is within 0.5 degrees of the total angle measured from on-board instrumentation. LAURA trim lift and drag force coefficients at flight conditions are within 7 and 5 percent, respectively, of the flight data. Computed trim lift-to-drag ratio is within 4 percent of the data. Computed aerodynamics sensitivities to center-of-gravity location, atmospheric density, and grid refinement are generally small. The results will enable a better estimate of aerodynamics uncertainties for future Mars entry vehicles where non-zero angle-of-attack is required.

[1]  Alvin Seiff,et al.  Atmospheres of earth, Mars, and Venus, as defined by entry probe experiments , 1991 .

[2]  F. M. Cheatwood,et al.  Mars Exploration Rover Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Entry Trajectory Analysis , 2006 .

[3]  James L. Hunt,et al.  Simulation of Real-Gas Effects for Mars Entry , 1974 .

[4]  Thomas J. Horvath,et al.  Supersonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of Proposed Mars '07 Smart Lander Configurations , 2002 .

[5]  P. M. Siemers,et al.  Transonic aerodynamic characteristics of the Viking entry and Lander configurations , 1971 .

[6]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .

[7]  G. D. Walberg,et al.  Determination of the hypersonic-continuum/rarefied-flow drag coefficient of the Viking lander capsule 1 aeroshell from flight data , 1980 .

[8]  Graham V. Candler,et al.  Review of Chemical-Kinetic Problems of Future NASA Missions, II: Mars Entries , 1993 .

[9]  Karl T. Edquist,et al.  Afterbody Heating Predictions for a Mars Science Laboratory Entry Vehicle , 2005 .

[10]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Influence of sonic-line location on Mars Pathfinder Probe aerothermodynamics , 1996 .

[11]  Prasun N. Desai,et al.  Static Aerodynamics of the Mars Exploration Rover Entry Capsule , 2005 .

[12]  Ramadas K. Prabhu,et al.  Aerodynamic Database Development for Mars Smart Lander Vehicle Configurations , 2002 .

[13]  William M. Congdon,et al.  Mars Pathfinder entry temperature data, aerothermal heating, and heatshield material response , 1998 .

[14]  Richard W. Powell,et al.  Mars Polar Lander Aerothermodynamic and Entry Dispersion Analysis , 1999 .

[15]  Thomas J. Horvath,et al.  Supersonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of Proposed Mars '07 Smart Lander Configurations , 2006 .

[16]  C Engelund Walter,et al.  Prediction and Validation of Mars Pathfinder Hypersonic Aerodynamic Data Base , 1998 .

[17]  Wayne Hathaway,et al.  Ballistic Range Testing of the Mars Exploration Rover Entry Capsule , 2005 .

[18]  C Engelund Walter,et al.  Prediction and Validation of Mars Pathfinder Hypersonic Aerodynamic Data Base , 1998 .

[19]  Richard W. Powell,et al.  Entry System Design Considerations for Mars Landers , 2001 .

[20]  Karl T. Edquist,et al.  Viking Afterbody Heating Computations and Comparisons to Flight Data , 2006 .

[21]  Cheatwood F. McNeil,et al.  User''s Manual for the Langley Aerothermodynamic Upwind Relaxation Algorithm (LAURA) , 1996 .