Selectivity for low-level features of objects in the human ventral stream

Category selective regions in the ventral visual stream are considered to support higher-level representations of objects. The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which category selectivity in face and place regions can be explained by selectivity for low-level features of these complex objects. First, we compared the relative responses to intact and Fourier-scrambled images of faces and places. Next, we compared the magnitude of fMR adaptation to both intact and scrambled faces and places. The results revealed that global differences in the amplitude spectrum of face and place images can explain a small proportion of the category selectivity that is found in regions such as the fusiform face area (FFA) and parahippocampal place area (PPA). However, a whole-brain analysis revealed selectivity to scrambled images in more posterior regions of the ventral stream. Consistent with the pattern evident for intact images, more lateral regions responded selectively to scrambled faces, whereas more medial regions responded more strongly to scrambled places. These findings suggest that selectivity for object categories emerges from the differential processing of low-level features that are typical of different object categories in early visual areas.

[1]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  R. Desimone,et al.  Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[5]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Discrimination Training Alters Object Representations in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[8]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[9]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[10]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Analysis of visual behavior , 1982 .

[11]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[12]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[13]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe , 2004, NeuroImage.

[14]  E K Warrington,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A Face-Specific Disorder , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[16]  G. Boynton,et al.  Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[18]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  fMR-adaptation reveals a distributed representation of inanimate objects and places in human visual cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[19]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Analysis of the Neuronal Selectivity Underlying Low fMRI Signals , 2002, Current Biology.

[20]  R. Watt,et al.  Biological "bar codes" in human faces. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[21]  Leila Reddy,et al.  Coding of visual objects in the ventral stream , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[22]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  An fMRI study of the selective activation of human extrastriate form vision areas by radial and concentric gratings , 2000, Current Biology.

[23]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  An image-dependent representation of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the human ventral stream , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  L. Maloney,et al.  Perceptual organization and neural computation. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[26]  R. Vogels,et al.  Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  I. Biederman,et al.  What makes faces special? , 2006, Vision Research.

[30]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Viewpoint-Specific Scene Representations in Human Parahippocampal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[32]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[33]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Interpreting fMRI data: maps, modules and dimensions , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  Roger B. H. Tootell,et al.  The `Parahippocampal Place Area' Responds Selectively to High Spatial Frequencies , 2010 .

[35]  S. Solomon,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in natural scenes depends on edge as well as spatial frequency structure. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[36]  A. Sirigu,et al.  Pure Topographical Disorientation: A Definition and Anatomical Basis , 1987, Cortex.

[37]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Eccentricity Bias as an Organizing Principle for Human High-Order Object Areas , 2002, Neuron.

[38]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Statistics of natural image categories , 2003, Network.

[39]  T. Hendler,et al.  A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  David Mumford,et al.  Statistics of natural images and models , 1999, Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149).

[41]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Center–periphery organization of human object areas , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  A stable topography of selectivity for unfamiliar shape classes in monkey inferior temporal cortex. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  R. VanRullen,et al.  Faces in the cloud: Fourier power spectrum biases ultrarapid face detection. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[44]  D I Perrett,et al.  Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[45]  Timothy J Andrews,et al.  Visual Cortex: How Are Faces and Objects Represented? , 2005, Current Biology.

[46]  Frank Tong,et al.  The Face of Controversy , 2001, Science.

[47]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  A Cortical Region Consisting Entirely of Face-Selective Cells , 2006, Science.