The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: choosing between creativity and impact.

It is commonly assumed that successful innovation depends on creative idea generation: the more ideas are generated, the higher the probability of selecting a very good idea should be. However, research has shown that people do not perform optimally at idea selection and that ideational output may not contribute much to creative idea selection. The present studies aim to explain this phenomenon. We identified the strong tendency of our participants to select feasible and desirable ideas, at the cost of originality, as the main reason for their poor selection performance. Two manipulations of participants' processing of the available ideas (exclusion instructions and quality ratings) had no effect on selection effectiveness. In contrast, explicitly instructing participants to select creative or original ideas did improve selection effectiveness with regard to idea originality, but at the same time decreased participants' satisfaction and the rated effectiveness of chosen ideas. Results are discussed in relation to an effectiveness-originality trade off.

[1]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Selection of strategies for narrowing choice options: Antecedents and consequences , 2002 .

[2]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. , 1998 .

[3]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity , 1993 .

[4]  Yaacov Schul,et al.  Elimination and inclusion procedures in judgment. , 1997 .

[5]  L. Beach.  Broadening the Definition of Decision Making: The Role of Prechoice Screening of Options , 1993 .

[6]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity , 1996 .

[7]  M. West.  Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups , 2002 .

[8]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Creativity and group innovation , 2002 .

[9]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Ian Begg,et al.  On believing what we remember. , 1985 .

[11]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  The Feeling of Familiarity as a Regulator of Persuasive Processing , 2001 .

[12]  William K. Graham,et al.  Tasks and Task Consequences as Factors in Individual and Group brainstorming , 1975 .

[13]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[14]  R. Sternberg.  Implicit theories of intelligence. creativity, and wisdom , 1985 .

[15]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. , 1997 .

[17]  I. Begg,et al.  Repetition and the ring of truth: Biasing comments. , 1991 .

[18]  Eric F. Rietzschel,et al.  Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. , 2006 .

[19]  C. Parks,et al.  Group Discussion as Affected by Number of Alternatives and by a Time Limit , 1995 .

[20]  Richard Jackson Harris,et al.  Effects of anticipated evaluation on individual brainstorming performance. , 1980 .

[21]  D. Cicchetti,et al.  Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. , 1981, American journal of mental deficiency.

[22]  Roni Reiter-Palmon,et al.  The Effects of Type and Level of Personal Involvement on Information Search and Problem Solving , 2004 .

[23]  Heather M. Claypool,et al.  Positivity Can Cue Familiarity , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[24]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[25]  Vicky L. Putman,et al.  Brainstorming, Brainstorming Rules and Decision Making , 2009 .

[26]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[27]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[28]  E. Salas,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. , 1991 .

[29]  Vincent R. Brown,et al.  Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. , 2003 .

[30]  G. A. Davis,et al.  Effects of simple instructional biases upon performance in the Unusual Uses Test. , 1968, The Journal of general psychology.

[31]  Corinne Faure,et al.  Beyond Brainstorming: Effects of Different Group Procedures on Selection of Ideas and Satisfaction with the Process , 2004 .