SEAI: Social Emotional Artificial Intelligence Based on Damasio’s Theory of Mind

A socially intelligent robot must be capable to extract meaningful information in real time from the social environment and react accordingly with coherent human-like behavior. Moreover, it should be able to internalize this information, to reason on it at a higher level, build its own opinions independently, and then automatically bias the decision-making according to its unique experience. In the last decades, neuroscience research highlighted the link between the evolution of such complex behavior and the evolution of a certain level of consciousness, which cannot leave out of a body that feels emotions as discriminants and prompters. In order to develop cognitive systems for social robotics with greater human-likeliness, we used an “understanding by building” approach to model and implement a well-known theory of mind in the form of an artificial intelligence, and we tested it on a sophisticated robotic platform. The name of the presented system is SEAI (Social Emotional Artificial Intelligence), a cognitive system specifically conceived for social and emotional robots. It is designed as a bio-inspired, highly modular, hybrid system with emotion modeling and high-level reasoning capabilities. It follows the deliberative/reactive paradigm where a knowledge-based expert system is aimed at dealing with the high-level symbolic reasoning, while a more conventional reactive paradigm is deputed to the low-level processing and control. The SEAI system is also enriched by a model that simulates the Damasio’s theory of consciousness and the theory of Somatic Markers. After a review of similar bio-inspired cognitive systems, we present the scientific foundations and their computational formalization at the basis of the SEAI framework. Then, a deeper technical description of the architecture is disclosed underlining the numerous parallelisms with the human cognitive system. Finally, the influence of artificial emotions and feelings, and their link with the robot’s beliefs and decisions have been tested in a physical humanoid involved in Human–Robot Interaction (HRI).

[1]  Robots in use , 1983 .

[2]  I-Ming Chen,et al.  Design of Robots Used as Education Companion and Tutor , 2016 .

[3]  Woojin Chung,et al.  Development of the multi-functional indoor service robot PSR systems , 2007, Auton. Robots.

[4]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor , 2010, CHI.

[5]  Giorgio Metta,et al.  YARP: Yet Another Robot Platform , 2006 .

[6]  S. Brison The Intentional Stance , 1989 .

[7]  A. Damasio,et al.  Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  A. Damasio,et al.  Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy , 1997, Science.

[9]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Psychological and Social Effects of One Year Robot Assisted Activity on Elderly People at a Health Service Facility for the Aged , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Tibor Bosse,et al.  LEADSTO: A Language and Environment for Analysis of Dynamics by SimulaTiOn , 2005, IEA/AIE.

[11]  G. Sandini,et al.  The iCub cognitive architecture: Interactive development in a humanoid robot , 2007, 2007 IEEE 6th International Conference on Development and Learning.

[12]  R. Brooks,et al.  The cog project: building a humanoid robot , 1999 .

[13]  Riccardo Manzotti,et al.  Riccardo Manzotti An Alternative View of Conscious Perception , 2006 .

[14]  Barbara Webb Robots can be (good) models , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  Lorenzo Cominelli,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Unique Social Perception System for Human–Robot Interaction , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.

[16]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[17]  Danilo De Rossi,et al.  Damasio's Somatic Marker for Social Robotics: Preliminary Implementation and Test , 2015, Living Machines.

[18]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Can Social Interaction Skills Be Taught by a Social Agent? The Role of a Robotic Mediator in Autism Therapy , 2001, Cognitive Technology.

[19]  R. Manzotti,et al.  Artificial Consciousness , 2007 .

[20]  Danilo De Rossi,et al.  I-CLIPS Brain: A Hybrid Cognitive System for Social Robots , 2014, Living Machines.

[21]  V. Siersma,et al.  The astonishing hypothesis. , 2012, Primary care diabetes.

[22]  J. Russell A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[23]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[24]  Henrik Schiøler,et al.  Sociable Robots Through Self-Maintained Energy , 2006 .

[25]  Cory D. Kidd,et al.  A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[26]  Danilo De Rossi,et al.  Designing and Evaluating a Social Gaze-Control System for a Humanoid Robot , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[27]  John Durkin,et al.  Expert Systems , 1994 .

[28]  N. Sharkey,et al.  Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[29]  S. Dehaene,et al.  What is consciousness, and could machines have it? , 2017, Science.

[30]  J. Broekens,et al.  Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review , 2009 .

[31]  B. Scassellati,et al.  Robots for use in autism research. , 2012, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[32]  J. Russell,et al.  The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology , 2005, Development and Psychopathology.

[33]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  A temporal modelling environment for internally grounded beliefs, desires and intentions , 2003, Cognitive Systems Research.

[34]  Riccardo Manzotti Outline of a Process View of Conscious Perception , 2006 .

[35]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  Distributed Adaptive Control: A theory of the Mind, Brain, Body Nexus , 2012, BICA 2012.

[36]  Roger K. Moore,et al.  Towards a Synthetic Tutor Assistant: The EASEL Project and its Architecture , 2016, Living Machines.

[37]  Daniela E. Damian,et al.  Specification of Bahavioural Requirements within Compositional Multi-agent System Design , 1999, MAAMAW.

[38]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[39]  Alessandro Tognetti,et al.  A Multimodal Perception Framework for Users Emotional State Assessment in Social Robotics , 2017, Future Internet.

[40]  C. Bartneck,et al.  A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[41]  B. Libet,et al.  Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[42]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  The iCub humanoid robot: An open-systems platform for research in cognitive development , 2010, Neural Networks.

[43]  Andrea Lockerd Thomaz,et al.  Perspective Taking: An Organizing Principle for Learning in Human-Robot Interaction , 2006, AAAI.

[44]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  Causal networks in simulated neural systems , 2008, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[45]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  How to build robots that make friends and influence people , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No.99CH36289).

[46]  Sean A. Spence,et al.  Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[47]  Aude Billard,et al.  Bringing up robots or—the psychology of socially intelligent robots: from theory to implementation , 1999, AGENTS '99.

[48]  A. Damasio The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness , 1999 .

[49]  Emily C. Collins,et al.  Optimising Robot Personalities for Symbiotic Interaction , 2014, Living Machines.

[50]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Emotion and sociable humanoid robots , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[51]  R. Igliozzi,et al.  An android for enhancing social skills and emotion recognition in people with autism , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[52]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  The Cognitive Controller: A Hybrid, Deliberative/Reactive Control Architecture for Autonomous Robots , 2004, IEA/AIE.

[53]  Leila Jafari Moghadam,et al.  Effect of utilizing a humanoid robot as a therapy-assistant in reducing anger, anxiety, and depression , 2014, 2014 Second RSI/ISM International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM).

[54]  Danilo De Rossi,et al.  HEFES: An Hybrid Engine for Facial Expressions Synthesis to control human-like androids and avatars , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[55]  B. Webb,et al.  Can robots make good models of biological behaviour? , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[56]  Tibor Bosse,et al.  Formalisation of Damasio’s theory of emotion, feeling and core consciousness , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.