Gold nanoshell-localized photothermal ablation of prostate tumors in a clinical pilot device study

Significance Prostate cancer is the most common nonskin cancer in the United States, where approximately 1 in 9 men will be diagnosed in their lifetime. The prostate is near several vital structures, such as the urethra and neurovascular bundle, and whole gland treatments for prostate cancer can disrupt normal urinary, bowel, and sexual functioning. Here we report the initial results of a clinical trial for nanoparticle-based photothermal cancer therapy. The trial was designed to perform ultrafocal photothermal ablation of cancerous tumors within the prostate. Gold-silica nanoparticles designed to absorb near-infrared light at wavelengths of high tissue transparency provide a highly localized light-based strategy for the treatment of prostate cancer, with substantially reduced risks for deleterious treatment-related side effects. Biocompatible gold nanoparticles designed to absorb light at wavelengths of high tissue transparency have been of particular interest for biomedical applications. The ability of such nanoparticles to convert absorbed near-infrared light to heat and induce highly localized hyperthermia has been shown to be highly effective for photothermal cancer therapy, resulting in cell death and tumor remission in a multitude of preclinical animal models. Here we report the initial results of a clinical trial in which laser-excited gold-silica nanoshells (GSNs) were used in combination with magnetic resonance–ultrasound fusion imaging to focally ablate low-intermediate-grade tumors within the prostate. The overall goal is to provide highly localized regional control of prostate cancer that also results in greatly reduced patient morbidity and improved functional outcomes. This pilot device study reports feasibility and safety data from 16 cases of patients diagnosed with low- or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer. After GSN infusion and high-precision laser ablation, patients underwent multiparametric MRI of the prostate at 48 to 72 h, followed by postprocedure mpMRI/ultrasound targeted fusion biopsies at 3 and 12 mo, as well as a standard 12-core systematic biopsy at 12 mo. GSN-mediated focal laser ablation was successfully achieved in 94% (15/16) of patients, with no significant difference in International Prostate Symptom Score or Sexual Health Inventory for Men observed after treatment. This treatment protocol appears to be feasible and safe in men with low- or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer without serious complications or deleterious changes in genitourinary function.

[1]  R. Stafford,et al.  Nanoshell-mediated near-infrared thermal therapy of tumors under magnetic resonance guidance , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  G. Mie Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen , 1908 .

[3]  R. Badalament,et al.  Cryosurgery for prostate cancer: improved glandular ablation by use of 6 to 8 cryoprobes. , 1999, Urology.

[4]  Erik C. Dreaden,et al.  The Golden Age: Gold Nanoparticles for Biomedicine , 2012 .

[5]  Jurgen J Fütterer,et al.  Complications, Recovery, and Early Functional Outcomes and Oncologic Control Following In-bore Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer. , 2015, European urology.

[6]  Naomi J. Halas,et al.  Plasmon Resonance Shifts of Au-Coated Au 2 S Nanoshells: Insight into Multicomponent Nanoparticle Growth , 1997 .

[7]  P Abel,et al.  Histological characteristics of the index lesion in whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens: implications for focal therapy , 2011, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[8]  H. Ahmed,et al.  Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy versus Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy in the Detection of Localised Radio-recurrent Prostate Cancer. , 2016, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[9]  Clare Allen,et al.  TOOKAD® Soluble vascular‐targeted photodynamic (VTP) therapy: determination of optimal treatment conditions and assessment of effects in patients with localised prostate cancer , 2013, BJU international.

[10]  P. Stricker,et al.  Focal irreversible electroporation for prostate cancer: functional outcomes and short-term oncological control , 2015, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Disease.

[11]  Mostafa A. El-Sayed,et al.  The golden age: gold nanoparticles for biomedicine. , 2012, Chemical Society reviews.

[12]  Leaf Huang,et al.  Exploring the tumor microenvironment with nanoparticles. , 2015, Cancer treatment and research.

[13]  Glenn P. Goodrich,et al.  Initial Evaluation of the Safety of Nanoshell-Directed Photothermal Therapy in the Treatment of Prostate Disease , 2016, International journal of toxicology.

[14]  P. Nordlander,et al.  A Hybridization Model for the Plasmon Response of Complex Nanostructures , 2003, Science.

[15]  Kelly L. Gill-Sharp,et al.  Selective nanoparticle‐directed ablation of the canine prostate , 2011, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[16]  Aytekin Oto,et al.  MR imaging-guided focal laser ablation for prostate cancer: phase I trial. , 2013, Radiology.

[17]  D. P. O'Neal,et al.  Photo-thermal tumor ablation in mice using near infrared-absorbing nanoparticles. , 2004, Cancer letters.

[18]  A. Sieroń,et al.  Treatment of localized prostate cancer using WST-09 and WST-11 mediated vascular targeted photodynamic therapy-A review. , 2015, Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy.

[19]  T. Tammela,et al.  Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up , 2014, The Lancet.

[20]  R. Weissleder A clearer vision for in vivo imaging , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[22]  Zhou,et al.  Controlled synthesis and quantum-size effect in gold-coated nanoparticles. , 1994, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[23]  T. Park,et al.  Diverse Applications of Nanomedicine , 2017, ACS nano.

[24]  H. Azzazy,et al.  Gold Nanoparticles in Biomedicine , 2011 .

[25]  J. Bender,et al.  Phase I Trial , 1983 .

[26]  Dan Peer,et al.  Mechanisms and Barriers in Cancer Nanomedicine: Addressing Challenges, Looking for Solutions. , 2017, ACS nano.

[27]  Naomi J. Halas,et al.  Nanoengineering of optical resonances , 1998 .

[28]  Nathan Lawrentschuk,et al.  The Role of Focal Therapy in the Management of Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review , 2014, European urology.

[29]  Peter P. Edwards,et al.  A new hydrosol of gold clusters. 1. Formation and particle size variation , 1993 .

[30]  C. Murphy,et al.  Recent Progress in Cancer Thermal Therapy Using Gold Nanoparticles , 2016 .

[31]  Meyer H. Birnboim,et al.  Composite structures for the enhancement of nonlinear-optical susceptibility , 1989 .

[32]  D. Margolis,et al.  Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer: Phase I Clinical Trial. , 2016, The Journal of urology.

[33]  J. Kench,et al.  Surveillance after prostate focal therapy , 2018, World Journal of Urology.

[34]  S Marsoni,et al.  The phase II trial. , 1985, Cancer treatment reports.

[35]  Glenn P. Goodrich,et al.  Evaluation of the Toxicity of Intravenous Delivery of Auroshell Particles (Gold–Silica Nanoshells) , 2012, International journal of toxicology.

[36]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Systematic Review of the Literature , 2021, Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy among Perinatal Women in Guyana.

[37]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2019 , 2019, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[38]  H. Ahmed,et al.  Template Mapping Biopsies: An Overview of Technique and Results , 2021, Interventional Urology.

[39]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  Focal laser ablation for prostate cancer followed by radical prostatectomy: validation of focal therapy and imaging accuracy. , 2010, European urology.

[40]  H. Ahmed,et al.  Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a phase I/II trial. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[41]  A. Oto,et al.  Phase II Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer. , 2016, The Journal of urology.

[42]  Milton Kerker,et al.  Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves from Two Concentric Spheres , 1951 .

[43]  Leon Hirsch,et al.  Nanoshell-Enabled Photonics-Based Imaging and Therapy of Cancer , 2004, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[44]  R Jason Stafford,et al.  Feasibility study of particle-assisted laser ablation of brain tumors in orthotopic canine model. , 2009, Cancer research.

[45]  P. Scardino,et al.  Focal therapy in prostate cancer: international multidisciplinary consensus on trial design. , 2014, European urology.

[46]  H. Ahmed,et al.  Focal cryotherapy of localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature , 2014, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[47]  Naomi J Halas,et al.  Nanoshell-enabled photothermal cancer therapy: impending clinical impact. , 2008, Accounts of chemical research.

[48]  Stefan Carlsson,et al.  Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial. , 2015, European urology.

[49]  J. Stanford,et al.  Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[50]  Xiaohua Huang,et al.  Cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy in the near-infrared region by using gold nanorods. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.