Wear of Human Enamel: A Quantitative in vitro Assessment

Many factors influence the extent and rate at which enamel wears. Clinical studies in humans are limited by difficulties in the accurate quantification of intra-oral wear and by a lack of control over the oral environment. The purpose of this study was to determine the wear characteristics of human dental enamel under controlled experimental conditions. An electro-mechanical tooth wear machine, in which opposing enamel surfaces of sectioned, extracted teeth were worn under various conditions, was used to simulate tooth grinding or bruxism. Enamel surface wear was quantified by weight to an accuracy of 0.1 mg, with water uptake and loss controlled. The variables considered included the structure and hardness of enamel, facet area, duration of tooth contact, relative speed of opposing surfaces, temperature, load, pH, and the nature of the lubricant. Enamel wear under non-lubricated conditions increased with increasing load over the range of 1.7 to 16.2 kg. The addition of a liquid lubricant (pH = 7) reduced enamel wear up to 6.7 kg, but when the load increased above this threshold, the rate of wear increased dramatically. With the viscosity of the lubricant constant and pH = 3, the rate of wear was further reduced to less than 10% of the non-lubricated rate at 9.95 kg, after which the rate again increased substantially. Under more extreme conditions (pH = 1.2, simulating gastric acids), the wear was excessive under all experimental loads. When saliva was used as a lubricant, the amount of wear was relatively low at 9.95 kg, but rapid wear occurred at 14.2 kg and above. These results indicate that under non-lubricated conditions, enamel wear remains low at high loads due to the dry-lubricating capabilities of fine enamel powder. Under lubricated conditions, low loads with an acidic lubricant lead to little enamel wear, whereas very low pH results in a high rate of wear under all loads.

[1]  B G Smith,et al.  An index for measuring the wear of teeth , 1984, British Dental Journal.

[2]  H. Busscher,et al.  A new profilometric method for determination of enamel and dentinal abrasion in vivo using computer comparisons: a pilot study. , 1991, Quintessence international.

[3]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Quantitative in vivo Wear of Human Enamel , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[4]  J. Halling,et al.  Tribological Properties of Solid Materials , 1978 .

[5]  W. Douglas,et al.  In vitro study of the wear characteristics of natural and artificial teeth. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  W. Douglas,et al.  Frictional effects between natural teeth in an artificial mouth. , 1985, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[7]  C H Gibbs,et al.  Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. , 1981, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  T. Stolarski,et al.  Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop. , 1996, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  M. J. Lalor,et al.  The measurement of wear in dental restorations using laser dual-source contouring , 1982 .

[10]  W. Douglas,et al.  The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. , 1986, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[11]  D F Taylor,et al.  Studies on the wear of porcelain, enamel, and gold. , 1971, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  S Molnar,et al.  Experimental studies in human tooth wear. II. , 1967, American journal of physical anthropology.

[13]  B G Smith,et al.  The prevalence of toothwear in 1007 dental patients. , 1996, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[14]  G C Townsend,et al.  Abrasion: an evolutionary and clinical view. , 1992, Australian prosthodontic journal.

[15]  W. Douglas,et al.  The wear of dental porcelain in an artificial mouth. , 1986, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  R. G. Craig,et al.  Wear of dental enamel , 1973 .

[17]  A. Harrison,et al.  Measurement of changes in surface profile due to wear using a 147Pm β particle backscatter technique II: Application to the simulated wear of dental composite resin and amalgam restorations , 1984 .

[18]  R. Wilding,et al.  Tooth wear measurements using a reflex microscope. , 1988, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[19]  R. A. Aziz,et al.  Effect of impact stress on the wear of some restorative materials and enamel. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[20]  A Harrison,et al.  The development of an abrasion testing machine for dental materials. , 1975, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  E. Lautenschlager,et al.  Non-linear in vitro wear of posterior composites with time. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[22]  F. Knap,et al.  Occlusal Wear in Prosthodontics , 1971 .

[23]  T. Przybeck,et al.  Tooth Wear Rates Among Contemporary Australian Aborigines , 1983, Journal of dental research.

[24]  R. DeLong,et al.  An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  R. G. Craig,et al.  REVIEW PAPER: WEAR OF DENTAL ENAMEL* , 1973 .