Big torrent measurement: A country-, network-, and content-centric analysis of video sharing in BitTorrent

BitTorrent (BT) is still widely used for, mostly, illegal file sharing despite the emergence of legal streaming services. Besides piracy BT traffic can be a challenge for networks and their management due to flash crowds. Measurements provide data to understand regional and temporal traffic patterns sup­porting network management. This work presents a large data set comprising three months of BT measurements from 2016, comprising more than 70,000 swarms and 6,600 samples. To identify the regions, Autonomous Systems (AS), and content responsible for the most traffic the raw measurement data is transformed and aggregated into graphs centered around countries, ASes, and videos. By calculating node-centric graph metrics the important actors in those graphs are identified and the changes over time are investigated. The results show that English-speaking countries are most important for the distribution of video files and that most traffic results from Philippine ASes and one Dutch AS belonging to a server hosting company. Furthermore, strong weekly patterns are observed which are effected by the release of popular content causing weekly flash crowds. The measurements presented herein raise doubt that anti-piracy measures are effective, showing that the piracy problem needs to be addressed on a global level since users can easily circumvent local measures taken. For network operators those results mean that traffic can be expected as soon as new popular content is released and that the destinations and source will change in the long term.

[1]  Luciano Paschoal Gaspary,et al.  Characterizing dissemination of illegal copies of content through monitoring of BitTorrent networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium.

[2]  Pablo Rodriguez,et al.  Deep diving into BitTorrent locality , 2011, INFOCOM.

[3]  Burkhard Stiller,et al.  Abstracting .torrent content consumption into two-mode graphs and their projection to content networks (ConNet) , 2017, 2017 IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM).

[4]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[5]  Fabián E. Bustamante,et al.  User Behavior and Change: File-sharers and Copyright Laws , 2014, CoNEXT.

[6]  B. Cohen,et al.  Incentives Build Robustness in Bit-Torrent , 2003 .

[7]  David Choffnes,et al.  On blind mice and the elephant , 2011, SIGCOMM 2011.

[8]  Di Wu,et al.  Unraveling the BitTorrent Ecosystem , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[9]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[10]  Maximilian Michel,et al.  Characterization of BitTorrent swarms and their distribution in the Internet , 2011, Comput. Networks.

[11]  Burkhard Stiller,et al.  Overlay network measurements with distribution evolution and geographical visualization , 2016, NOMS 2016 - 2016 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium.

[12]  Michael Seufert,et al.  Social Network Analysis in the Enterprise: Challenges and Opportunities , 2014, Socioinformatics.

[13]  Burkhard Stiller,et al.  The BitTorrent Peer Collector Problem , 2017, 2017 IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM).

[14]  Yu He,et al.  The YouTube video recommendation system , 2010, RecSys '10.