Pressor with promise: using vasopressin in cardiopulmonary arrest.

Despite their widespread use, current methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and advanced cardiac life support continue to yield poor results. In the United States, the national average for long-term survival after cardiac arrest in patients with an out-of-hospital arrest remains <5%. Surprisingly, the use of epinephrine, the mainstay of pharmacological therapy in cardiac arrest, is supported only by animal studies and anecdotal case reports. We would like to present evidence that vasopressin, alone or in combination with epinephrine, is more effective than epinephrine in the treatment of cardiopulmonary arrest. Its use during advanced cardiac life support may improve the chances of survival after cardiopulmonary arrest. All forms of stress elicit an endocrine response. Cardiopulmonary arrest, the ultimate stress,1 results in the release of endogenous epinephrine and norepinephrine in animals and humans. Systemic vascular resistance increases, with preferential redistribution of blood flow to myocardial and cerebral vessels.2 The discovery of this pressor response prompted trials of catecholamines in animal models of cardiac arrest, ultimately leading to the use of epinephrine in human subjects. For more than three decades, epinephrine has been the drug of choice and the major pharmacological intervention in cardiac arrest. A recent randomized, controlled trial comparing epinephrine with placebo showed that neither high-dose nor standard-dose epinephrine altered survival in cardiac …

[1]  K. Lindner,et al.  Randomised comparison of epinephrine and vasopressin in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation , 1997, The Lancet.

[2]  K. Lindner,et al.  Vasopressin Administration in Refractory Cardiac Arrest , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  K. Lindner,et al.  Release of endogenous vasopressors during and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. , 1996, Heart.

[4]  C. Case,et al.  High dose and standard dose adrenaline do not alter survival, compared with placebo, in cardiac arrest. , 1995, Resuscitation.

[5]  K. Lurie,et al.  Regulated to Death: The Matter of Informed Consent for Human Experimentation in Emergency Resuscitation Research , 1995, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  K. Lindner,et al.  Effect of vasopressin on hemodynamic variables, organ blood flow, and acid-base status in a pig model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. , 1993, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[7]  H. Schaff,et al.  Arginine vasopressin induces endothelium-dependent vasodilatation of the pulmonary artery. V1-receptor-mediated production of nitric oxide. , 1993, Chest.

[8]  P. Pepe,et al.  A comparison of standard-dose and high-dose epinephrine in cardiac arrest outside the hospital. The Multicenter High-Dose Epinephrine Study Group. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  M. Georgieff,et al.  Stress hormone response during and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. , 1992, Anesthesiology.

[10]  B. Walker,et al.  Role of nitric oxide in vasopressinergic pulmonary vasodilatation. , 1992, American Journal of Physiology.

[11]  P. Cryer,et al.  Adrenomedullary response to maximal stress in humans. , 1984, The American journal of medicine.

[12]  M. Georgieff,et al.  Vasopressin Improves Vital Organ Blood Flow During Closed-Chest Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Pigs , 1995 .