Habitat and social factors shape individual decisions and emergent group structure during baboon collective movement

For group-living animals traveling through heterogeneous landscapes, collective movement can be influenced by both habitat structure and social interactions. Yet research in collective behavior has largely neglected habitat influences on movement. Here we integrate simultaneous, high-resolution, tracking of wild baboons within a troop with a 3-dimensional reconstruction of their habitat to identify key drivers of baboon movement. A previously unexplored social influence – baboons’ preference for locations that other troop members have recently traversed – is the most important predictor of individual movement decisions. Habitat is shown to influence movement over multiple spatial scales, from long-range attraction and repulsion from the troop’s sleeping site, to relatively local influences including road-following and a short-range avoidance of dense vegetation. Scaling to the collective level reveals a clear association between habitat features and the emergent structure of the group, highlighting the importance of habitat heterogeneity in shaping group coordination. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19505.001

[1]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Regression Analysis by Example , 1979 .

[2]  B. Hirsch COSTS AND BENEFITS OF WITHIN‐GROUP SPATIAL POSITION: A FEEDING COMPETITION MODEL , 2007, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[3]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Fine-scale disturbances shape space-use patterns of a boreal forest herbivore , 2010 .

[4]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[5]  I. Couzin,et al.  Emergent Sensing of Complex Environments by Mobile Animal Groups , 2013, Science.

[6]  Mark S Boyce,et al.  Applications of step-selection functions in ecology and conservation , 2014, Movement Ecology.

[7]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Moving to stay in place: behavioral mechanisms for coexistence of African large carnivores. , 2013, Ecology.

[8]  Mathieu Basille,et al.  Plastic response of fearful prey to the spatiotemporal dynamics of predator distribution. , 2015, Ecology.

[9]  Colin R. Twomey,et al.  Revealing the hidden networks of interaction in mobile animal groups allows prediction of complex behavioral contagion , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks , 2010, Nature.

[11]  M. Lewis,et al.  A unifying framework for quantifying the nature of animal interactions , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[12]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  Vulnerability to predation in baboon populations , 1994 .

[13]  G. Asner,et al.  Movement patterns of three arboreal primates in a Neotropical moist forest explained by LiDAR-estimated canopy structure , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  D. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2010 .

[15]  A Cost of Leadership in Human Groups , 2007 .

[16]  Marc Holderied,et al.  Delayed Response and Biosonar Perception Explain Movement Coordination in Trawling Bats , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Where Next? Group Coordination and Collective Decision Making by Primates , 2011, International Journal of Primatology.

[18]  M. Boyce,et al.  WOLVES INFLUENCE ELK MOVEMENTS: BEHAVIOR SHAPES A TROPHIC CASCADE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 2005 .

[19]  I. Couzin,et al.  Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  D. Biro,et al.  Landscape complexity influences route-memory formation in navigating pigeons , 2014, Biology Letters.

[21]  J. Wall,et al.  Elephants avoid costly mountaineering , 2006, Current Biology.

[22]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[23]  Leo Polansky,et al.  Elucidating the significance of spatial memory on movement decisions by African savannah elephants using state–space models , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Karen Anderson,et al.  Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology , 2013 .

[25]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Dominance and Affiliation Mediate Despotism in a Social Primate , 2008, Current Biology.

[26]  A. Agresti Categorical data analysis , 1993 .

[27]  Joseph T. McGuire,et al.  Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  I. Giardina Collective Animal Behavior David J.T. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  Alan M. Wilson,et al.  Endosymbiosis , 2012, Current Biology.

[30]  L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. , 1999, Science.

[31]  Julie A. Teichroeb,et al.  Vervet (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) Intragroup Spatial Positioning: Dominants Trade-Off Predation Risk for Increased Food Acquisition , 2015, International Journal of Primatology.

[32]  Mathieu Leblond,et al.  What drives fine-scale movements of large herbivores? A case study using moose , 2010 .

[33]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Vehicle traffic shapes grizzly bear behaviour on a multiple‐use landscape , 2012 .

[34]  B. Hirsch Within-group spatial position in ring-tailed coatis: balancing predation, feeding competition, and social competition , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  Christian Rutz,et al.  Reality mining of animal social systems. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[36]  R. Kays,et al.  Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet , 2015, Science.

[37]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Regularisation Paths for Conditional Logistic Regression: the clogitL1 package , 2014, 1405.3344.

[38]  Roland Kays,et al.  Data from: Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons , 2015 .

[39]  D. Sumpter,et al.  From Compromise to Leadership in Pigeon Homing , 2006, Current Biology.

[40]  Lael Parrott,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamics in the response of woodland caribou and moose to the passage of grey wolf. , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[41]  M. Boyce,et al.  Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[42]  L. Edelstein-Keshet Collective Animal Behavior , 2011 .

[43]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  Collective States, Multistability and Transitional Behavior in Schooling Fish , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  A. J. King,et al.  The ecological determinants of baboon troop movements at local and continental scales , 2015, Movement Ecology.

[45]  Daniel W. Franks,et al.  Social networks and models for collective motion in animals , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[46]  Andrew Thomas Hudak,et al.  A Multiscale Curvature Algorithm for Classifying Discrete Return LiDAR in Forested Environments , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[47]  Aurélie Coulon,et al.  Inferring the effects of landscape structure on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) movements using a step selection function , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[48]  I. Couzin,et al.  Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons , 2015, Science.

[49]  S. Pimm,et al.  Data-driven discovery of the spatial scales of habitat choice by elephants , 2014, PeerJ.

[50]  P. Beier,et al.  INFLUENCE OF VEGETATION, TOPOGRAPHY, AND ROADS ON COUGAR MOVEMENT IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA , 2005 .

[51]  Jens Krause DIFFERENTIAL FITNESS RETURNS IN RELATION TO SPATIAL POSITION IN GROUPS , 1994, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[52]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.