Using creative problem solving to promote students’ performance of concept mapping

The purpose of the study was to explore that using creative problem solving can promote students’ performance of concept mapping (CMPING). Students were encouraged to use creative problem solving (CPS) in constructing nanometer knowledge structure, and then to promote the performance of CMPING. The knowledge structure was visualized through CMPING which helps students to improve their performance. The participants were 42 college juniors who selected the course “Nano-environmental Engineering Technology”. Four instruments were used to classify student learning performance (meaningful learning, rote learning and non-learning). This study included three main issues: (1) Student learning quality was determined by the change in concept map construction. (2) In-depth interviews were applied to understand student’s CPS process. (3) Student interaction quality in a discussion board on a web-platform was evaluated. The results showed that meaningful high-level learners successfully applied CPS in constructing concept maps and they presented better performance of CMPING. Rote learners’ results were in the second place, and non-learners achieved the worse outcomes. It is suggested that a future teaching study can use creative problem solving to promote students’ performance of CMPING in other courses.

[1]  Magdalena Mo Ching Mok,et al.  Self‐assessment in higher education: experience in using a metacognitive approach in five case studies , 2006 .

[2]  E. Torrance.  Understanding Creativity: Where to Start? , 1993 .

[3]  S. Isaksen,et al.  Celebrating 50 years of Reflective Practice: Versions of Creative Problem Solving , 2004 .

[4]  Simon Lygo-Baker,et al.  Measuring the quality of e-learning , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[5]  Nicolas Michinov,et al.  Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Ted Selker.  Fostering motivation and creativity for computer users , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Wing-Sum Cheung,et al.  Online discussion and critical thinking skills: A case study in a Singapore secondary school , 2008 .

[8]  C. MacKnight.  Teaching Critical Thinking through Online Discussions. , 2000 .

[9]  G. Tindal,et al.  Determining the Exchangeability of Concept Map and Problem-Solving Essay Scores , 2006 .

[10]  Nikolaos M. Avouris,et al.  Computer-Supported Collaborative Concept Mapping: Study of Synchronous Peer Interaction , 2002, Education and Information Technologies.

[11]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups. , 1982 .

[12]  Katherine M. Edmondson,et al.  Chapter 2 – Assessing science understanding through concept maps , 2005 .

[13]  Eugenia Etkina,et al.  College Physics Students' Epistemological Self-Reflection and Its Relationship to Conceptual Learning. , 2002 .

[14]  B. Jong,et al.  Students' learning status evolved from dynamic grouping learning , 2005, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference.

[15]  David H. Cropley,et al.  Fostering Creativity in Engineering Undergraduates , 2000 .

[16]  J. Novak.  Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education , 1990 .

[17]  Winslow Burleson,et al.  Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  Edwin C. Selby,et al.  Understanding Individual Problem-Solving Style: A Key to Learning and Applying Creative Problem Solving. , 2008 .

[19]  Siu Cheung Kong,et al.  A web enabled video system for self reflection by student teachers using a guiding framework , 2009 .

[20]  V. Helgeson,et al.  Motives for Social Comparison , 1995 .

[21]  Yiping Lou,et al.  Web-Based Learning , 2004 .

[22]  Hsen-Hsing Ma.  A Synthetic Analysis of the Effectiveness of Single Components and Packages in Creativity Training Programs , 2006 .

[23]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Creativity support tools , 2002, CACM.

[24]  Meg McGinity Shannon.  Shaking hands, kissing babies, and…blogging? , 2007, CACM.

[25]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Learning processes and collaborative concept mapping , 1997 .

[26]  J. Novak,et al.  Concept mapping brings long‐term movement toward meaningful learning , 1990 .

[27]  Erman Yükseltürk,et al.  Investigation of Interaction, Online Support, Course Structure and Flexibility as the Contributing Factors to Students' Satisfaction in an Online Certificate Program , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[28]  Alberto J. Cañas,et al.  Building on New Constructivist Ideas and CmapTools to Create a New Model for Education 1 , 2004 .

[29]  J. Crocker,et al.  The Self-Protective Properties of Stigma: Evolution of a Modern Classic , 2003 .

[30]  Nada Dabbagh,et al.  Concept Mapping as a Mindtool for Critical Thinking , 2001 .

[31]  J. V. Wood,et al.  Theory and Research Concerning Social Comparisons of Personal Attributes , 1989 .

[32]  D. Treffinger.  Creative Problem Solving: Overview and educational implications , 1995 .

[33]  D. Hay.  Using concept maps to measure deep, surface and non‐learning outcomes , 2007 .

[34]  O. Holsti.  Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities , 1969 .

[35]  Qiyun Wang,et al.  Investigating critical thinking and knowledge construction in an interactive learning environment , 2009, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[36]  Alberto J. Cañas,et al.  A TEORIA SUBJACENTE AOS MAPAS CONCEITUAIS E COMO ELABORÁ-LOS E USÁ-LOS * THE THEORY UNDERLYING CONCEPT MAPS AND HOW TO CONSTRUCT AND USE THEM , 2010 .

[37]  Katia Passerini,et al.  A developmental model for distance learning using the Internet , 2000 .

[38]  A. Hron,et al.  A review of web-based collaborative learning: factors beyond technology , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[39]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Buy Low and Sell High: An Investment Approach to Creativity , 1992 .

[40]  Chuen-Tsai Sun,et al.  Breaking concept boundaries to enhance creative potential: Using integrated concept maps for conceptual self-awareness , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[41]  Dennis R. Brophy.  Understanding, Measuring, and Enhancing Individual Creative Problem-Solving Efforts , 1998 .

[42]  Tanya McGill,et al.  The effect of assessment on the outcomes of asynchronous online discussion as perceived by instructors , 2009 .

[43]  Ian M. Kinchin,et al.  Using concept mapping to measure learning quality , 2008 .

[44]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Creativity support tools: accelerating discovery and innovation , 2007, CACM.

[45]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Assessing science understanding , 2005 .

[46]  Piet Kommers,et al.  Concept mapping instrumental support for problem solving. , 2008 .

[47]  Ya-Ling Wu,et al.  An investigation of coopetitive pedagogic design for knowledge creation in Web-based learning , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[48]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[49]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[50]  N. Webb.  Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[51]  M. Mumford,et al.  The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review , 2004 .

[52]  Mary Thorpe,et al.  Effective online interaction: Mapping course design to bridge from research to practice , 2008 .

[53]  Azilawati Jamaludin,et al.  Using asynchronous online discussions in primary school project work , 2006 .

[54]  R. Stephen Russell,et al.  Creativity Training--A Practical Teaching Strategy. , 1994 .

[55]  Petrus A.M. Kommers,et al.  Concept Mapping as a Medium of Shared Cognition in Computer-Supported Collaborative Problem Solving , 2002 .