Reading about energy: The effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change

The present study investigated the effects of text structure in the acquisition of the concept of energy and the overcoming of specific preconceptions associated with it. Cypriot sixth-grade students read either a simple expository text that presented factual information or a refutation text that also explicitly addressed two common preconceptions and proceeded to refute them. Both texts were used as adjuncts to the standard science instruction that is typically provided in the Cypriot elementary school. Students who read the refutation text outperformed students who read the expository text and students who received standard instruction only. In contrast, the influence of the expository text was negligible and generally comparable to that of standard instruction. The implications of these results for the instructional use of refutational text structures were discussed.

[1]  L. M. Van Dusen,et al.  The role of prior knowledge and elaboration in text comprehension and memory: a comparison of self-generated elaboration and text-provided elaboration. , 1998, The American journal of psychology.

[2]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. , 1996 .

[3]  Thomas Andre,et al.  Conceptual change text versus traditional text and application questions versus no questions in learning about electricity , 1991 .

[4]  Barbara J. Guzzetti,et al.  Influence of text structure on learning counterintuitive physics concepts , 1997 .

[5]  Barbara J. Guzzetti,et al.  Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education , 1993 .

[6]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Use of elaborative interrogation to help students acquire information consistent with prior knowledge and information inconsistent with prior knowledge , 1994 .

[7]  P. Scott,et al.  Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom , 1994 .

[8]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processes in Reading Comprehension. Technical Report No. 306. , 1988 .

[9]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[10]  Carol K. K. Chan,et al.  Constructive Activity in Learning From Text , 1992 .

[11]  James F. Voss,et al.  Text Processing of Domain-Related Information for Individuals with High and Low Domain Knowledge: Methodological Considerations. , 1979 .

[12]  Carl W. Roberts,et al.  Linguistic Content Analysis: A Method to Measure Science as Inquiry in Textbooks. , 1993 .

[13]  Katherine Maria,et al.  Learning from texts that refute the reader's prior knowledge , 1987 .

[14]  Cynthia R. Hynd,et al.  Preservice elementary school teachers' conceptual change about projectile motion: Refutation text, demonstration, affective factors, and relevance , 1997 .

[15]  M. Chi,et al.  Naive Physics Reasoning: A Commitment to Substance-Based Conceptions , 2000 .

[16]  J. Clement Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .

[17]  W. Kintsch Learning From Text , 1986, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[18]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Teaching for Understanding: A Study of Students' Preinstruction Theories of Matter and a Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Approaches to Teaching About Matter and Density , 1997 .

[19]  Irene-Anna N. Diakidoy,et al.  Facilitating conceptual change in astronomy: a comparison of the effectiveness of two instructional approaches , 2001 .

[20]  P. David Pearson Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[21]  Mike Summers,et al.  Surveys of english primary teachers' conceptions of force, energy, and materials , 1992 .

[22]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[23]  Michelle Gaddy Everson,et al.  Effects of Causal Text Revisions on More- and Less-Skilled Readers' Comprehension of Easy and Difficult Texts , 2000 .

[24]  Thomas Andre,et al.  Are Conceptual Change Approaches to Learning Science Effective for Everyone? Gender, Prior Subject Matter Interest, and Learning about Electricity. , 1995 .

[25]  Reinders Duit,et al.  Learning the Energy Concept in School--Empirical Results from the Philippines and West Germany. , 1984 .

[26]  Donna E. Alvermann,et al.  Comprehension of Counterintuitive Science Text: Effects of Prior Knowledge and Text Structure , 1989 .

[27]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  Understanding Reading Comprehension: Current and Future Contributions of Cognitive Science , 1997 .

[28]  W. Brewer,et al.  Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  M. Chi,et al.  From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts , 1994 .

[30]  Hamilton Effects of Three Types of Elaboration on Learning Concepts from Text , 1997, Contemporary educational psychology.

[31]  J. Warren The nature of energy , 1982 .

[32]  Irene-Anna Diakidoy Comprehension and learning from scientific text. , 1999 .

[33]  W. Kintsch The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[34]  S. Carey Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[35]  Donna E. Alvermann,et al.  Effects of interactive discussion and text type on learning counterintuitive science concepts , 1995 .

[36]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[37]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  Theoretical issues in reading comprehension : perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education , 1980 .

[38]  Jim Garrison,et al.  Realism, Deweyan Pragmatism, and Educational Research , 1994 .

[39]  Donna E. Alvermann,et al.  Prior Knowledge Activation and the Comprehension of Compatible and Incompatible Text. , 1985 .

[40]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Teaching Readers about the Structure of Scientific Text. , 1988 .