Use of Next Generation Weather Radar Data and Basin Disaggregation to Improve Continuous Hydrograph Simulations

Currently, the river forecasting system deployed in each of 13 River Forecast Centers of the National Weather Service primarily uses lumped parameter models to generate hydrologic simulations. With the deployment of the weather surveillance radar 1988 Doppler radars, more and more precipitation data with high spatial and temporal resolution have become available for hydrologic modeling. Hydrologists inside and outside the National Weather Service are now investigating how to effectively use these data to enhance river-forecasting capabilities. In this paper, six years of continuously simulated hydrographs from an eight-subbasin model are compared to those from a single-basin ~or lumped! model, both applied to the Blue River basin ~1,232 km 2 ! in Oklahoma. The Sacramento soil moisture accounting model is used to generate runoff in all cases. Synthetic unit hydrographs for each subbasin convey the water to the outlet of the basin without explicit flow routing. Subdividing the basin into eight subbasins captures spatially variable rainfall reflected in the next generation weather radar products and produces improved results without greatly increasing the computational and data requirements. Strategies for calibrating the hydrologic model parameters for multiple subbasins are explored.

[1]  Maria Mimikou,et al.  Flood Forecasting Based on Radar Rainfall Measurements , 1996 .

[2]  V. Koren,et al.  STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF MEAN AREAL PRECIPITATION ESTIMATES FROM WSR-88D, OPERATIONAL AND HISTORICAL GAGE NETWORKS , 2000 .

[3]  J. C. Peters,et al.  Runoff simulation using radar rainfall data , 1996 .

[4]  Philip B. Bedient,et al.  NEXRAD RADAR FOR FLOOD PREDICTION IN HOUSTON , 2000 .

[5]  Rafael L. Bras,et al.  Use of Weather Radar for Flood Forecasting in the Sieve River Basin: A Sensitivity Analysis , 1993 .

[6]  Victor Koren,et al.  Use of Soil Property Data in the Derivation of Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Model Parameters , 2000 .

[7]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Space-time scale sensitivity of the Sacramento model to radar-gage precipitation inputs , 1997 .

[8]  Victor Koren,et al.  Comparing Mean Areal Precipitation Estimates from NEXRAD and Rain Gauge Networks , 1999 .

[9]  Philip B. Bedient,et al.  Estimation of Rainfall for Flood Prediction from WSR-88D Reflectivity: A Case Study, 17–18 October 1994* , 1998 .

[10]  Victor Koren,et al.  Distributed modeling phase 1 results , 1999 .

[11]  R. Rosso Nash Model Relation to Horton Order Ratios , 1984 .

[12]  V. Koren,et al.  Lumped and Semi-distributed Modeling using NEXRAD Stage-III Data: Results from Continuous Multi-year Simulations , 1999 .

[13]  Douglas A. Miller,et al.  A Conterminous United States Multilayer Soil Characteristics Dataset for Regional Climate and Hydrology Modeling , 1998 .

[14]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  DISTRIBUTED MODELING FOR IMPROVED NWS RIVER FORECASTS , 2002 .

[15]  William H. Heiss,et al.  Nexrad - Next generation weather radar (WSR-88D) , 1990 .

[16]  C. O. Clark Storage and the Unit Hydrograph , 1945 .

[17]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  On the simulation of infiltration‐ and saturation‐excess runoff using radar‐based rainfall estimates: Effects of algorithm uncertainty and pixel aggregation , 1998 .

[18]  Richard K. Farnsworth,et al.  Mean monthly, seasonal, and annual pan evaporation for the United States , 1983 .

[19]  George H. Leavesley,et al.  Prediction of a Flash Flood in Complex Terrain. Part II: A Comparison of Flood Discharge Simulations Using Rainfall Input from Radar, a Dynamic Model, and an Automated Algorithmic System , 2000 .

[20]  E. L. Peck,et al.  Catchment modeling and initial parameter estimation for the National Weather Service River Forecast System , 1976 .

[21]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Scale dependencies of hydrologic models to spatial variability of precipitation , 1999 .

[22]  Arlen Feldman,et al.  Closure of "Evolution of Clark’s Unit Graph Method to Spatially Distributed Runoff" , 1999 .